|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| FLORIDA A&M | | | | N CAROLINA A&T | -7 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-1 | 3-5 | 9-10 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 4-11 | 8-22 | 30-65 | 188-301 | | in all lined games | 1-1 | 3-5 | 9-10 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 4-11 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 6-13 | | as an underdog | 1-0 | 3-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 3-10 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 6-10 | | in all neutral court games | 1-1 | 3-5 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 22-31 | | as a neutral court underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | | against conference opponents | 0-0 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-6 | 5-11 | 20-32 | 146-165 | | in March games | 0-0 | 2-2 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 2-7 | 32-29 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 10-27 | | after a conference game | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-9 | 5-11 | 21-31 | 144-166 | | when playing on a neutral court | 1-1 | 3-5 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 22-31 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 0-0 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 8-14 | 53-68 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-1 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 4-15 | 21-43 | 157-187 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 1-1 | 2-4 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 3-9 | 8-21 | 42-70 | | in all tournament games | 1-1 | 3-5 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 4-10 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 20-19 | | in first round tournament games | 0-0 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-5 | | in conference tournament games | 0-0 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 17-10 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-1 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 7-11 | 18-34 | 136-150 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 3-6 | 11-18 | 88-79 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-6 | 3-9 | 17-23 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-9 | 4-20 | 24-58 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 8-11 | 62-47 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-1 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 5-9 | 11-21 | 94-78 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 3-0 | 6-3 | 8-6 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 7-4 | 15-16 | 42-53 | 173-301 | | in all lined games | 3-0 | 6-3 | 8-6 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 5-4 | 6-8 | | as a favorite | 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | | in all neutral court games | 2-0 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 7-24 | | as a neutral court favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | | against conference opponents | 1-0 | 4-3 | 5-5 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 5-4 | 8-8 | 24-26 | 126-174 | | in March games | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 2-5 | 11-34 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 10-22 | | after a conference game | 1-0 | 4-3 | 5-5 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 5-4 | 10-6 | 24-26 | 122-176 | | when playing on a neutral court | 2-0 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 7-24 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 8-8 | 14-12 | 44-55 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 2-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 8-6 | 11-18 | 41-91 | | in all tournament games | 2-0 | 2-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 6-17 | | in first round tournament games | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-5 | | in conference tournament games | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 4-12 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-0 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 11-6 | 29-15 | 127-147 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 7-4 | 18-12 | 79-87 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-22 | -2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 65.4 | 30.1 | 39.5% | 35.4 | 72.3 | 35.0 | 44.7% | 40.4 | | Road Games | 2-18 | -2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 64.9 | 30.3 | 38.5% | 34.8 | 76.3 | 37.5 | 45.5% | 41.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 62.8 | 26.4 | 35.2% | 35.4 | 68.2 | 31.8 | 45.1% | 39.2 | | Conference Games | 5-11 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 60.4 | 27.1 | 38.3% | 33.7 | 65.9 | 30.2 | 43.5% | 39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.4 | 30.1 | 24-60 | 39.5% | 6-18 | 30.5% | 12-20 | 62.6% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.3 | 31.7 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 67.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.9 | 30.3 | 23-61 | 38.5% | 6-19 | 30.4% | 13-19 | 64.4% | 35 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.3 | 35.0 | 26-57 | 44.7% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 15-23 | 66.7% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 64.1 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 13-19 | 66.2% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.3 | 37.5 | 27-59 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 37.0% | 17-24 | 70.3% | 41 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 15-16 | +3.5 | 3-0 | 1-0 | 61.8 | 29.3 | 39.2% | 35.8 | 61.7 | 28.6 | 38.4% | 37.2 | | Road Games | 6-13 | +2.5 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 59.8 | 27.9 | 37.6% | 34.9 | 64.7 | 29.8 | 39.3% | 38.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 52.2 | 26.4 | 32.7% | 33.8 | 50.8 | 24.4 | 35.8% | 37.4 | | Conference Games | 8-8 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 57.2 | 28.2 | 37.6% | 36.1 | 54.1 | 25.2 | 36.1% | 36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 61.8 | 29.3 | 21-53 | 39.2% | 6-20 | 29.2% | 14-22 | 65.3% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 31 | 23-54 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 32.2% | 14-21 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.8 | 27.9 | 20-53 | 37.6% | 6-20 | 29.5% | 14-22 | 64.1% | 35 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.7 | 28.6 | 20-53 | 38.4% | 7-20 | 31.9% | 15-22 | 66.3% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 64.9 | 30.2 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 13-20 | 66.5% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.7 | 29.8 | 21-53 | 39.3% | 7-21 | 31.9% | 16-24 | 66.1% | 38 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: FLORIDA A&M 63.5, N CAROLINA A&T 64.4 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| N CAROLINA A&T is 17-12 straight up against FLORIDA A&M since 1997 |
| |
| N CAROLINA A&T is 4-1 straight up against FLORIDA A&M over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/11/2013 | FLORIDA A&M | 56 | | | 26 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 30 | 6 | 16 | | | N CAROLINA A&T | 64 | | SU | 30 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 15-25 | 60.0% | 42 | 15 | 10 | 1/14/2013 | N CAROLINA A&T | 68 | | SU | 23 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 46 | 9 | 18 | | | FLORIDA A&M | 40 | | | 13 | 13-57 | 22.8% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 34 | 13 | 13 | 2/6/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 77 | | | 31 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 29 | 10 | 22 | | | FLORIDA A&M | 87 | | SU | 39 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 11-22 | 50.0% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 45 | 15 | 18 | 1/9/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 82 | | | 32 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 41 | 7 | 19 | | | N CAROLINA A&T | 85 | | SU | 38 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 11-34 | 32.4% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 40 | 6 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FLORIDA A&M games 40% of the time since 1997. (6-9) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FLORIDA A&M games 75% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (3-1) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in N CAROLINA A&T games 50% of the time since 1997. (6-6) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in N CAROLINA A&T games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (4-4) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 03/12/2013 - Reggie Lewis expected to miss Tuesday vs. N. Carolina A&T ( Ankle ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|