|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| ST JOHNS | | | | CINCINNATI | -18 |  |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 3-5 | 30-36 | 209-205 | 4-1 | 34-29 | 139-162 | 8-5 | 42-36 | 260-225 | | in all lined games | 3-5 | 30-36 | 209-205 | 4-1 | 34-29 | 139-162 | 4-4 | 33-35 | 202-220 | | when the total is 130 to 139.5 | 1-1 | 17-22 | 66-68 | 2-0 | 19-20 | 65-69 | 1-1 | 18-22 | 59-78 | | as an underdog | 1-4 | 19-21 | 123-105 | 2-1 | 22-17 | 94-99 | 1-4 | 14-28 | 67-163 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 to 15 points | 0-0 | 1-1 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-20 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 3-1 | 23-15 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 17-17 | 0-0 | 0-5 | 0-39 | | in road games | 1-2 | 12-14 | 92-73 | 1-1 | 15-10 | 61-56 | 1-2 | 8-19 | 58-113 | | in road lined games | 1-2 | 12-14 | 92-73 | 1-1 | 15-10 | 61-56 | 1-2 | 8-19 | 54-113 | | in a road game where the total is 135 to 139.5 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 9-13 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 14-7 | 0-1 | 1-6 | 2-21 | | against conference opponents | 0-1 | 19-19 | 139-132 | 1-0 | 21-18 | 95-105 | 0-1 | 19-21 | 126-150 | | in January games | 0-1 | 7-10 | 63-58 | 1-0 | 8-9 | 33-47 | 0-1 | 6-12 | 54-71 | | on Saturday games | 0-1 | 9-8 | 73-62 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 44-44 | 4-0 | 13-10 | 83-75 | | after a conference game | 1-0 | 18-19 | 129-134 | 1-0 | 20-18 | 93-106 | 1-0 | 16-23 | 122-153 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-0 | 8-10 | 70-71 | 0-0 | 8-11 | 55-60 | 0-0 | 6-13 | 52-91 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 0-1 | 5-8 | 31-30 | 0-0 | 3-9 | 14-26 | 2-0 | 6-8 | 34-36 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 0-0 | 4-5 | 29-33 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 18-16 | 1-0 | 8-4 | 54-26 | | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 0-0 | 4-0 | 24-10 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 18-18 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-4 | 24-25 | 159-164 | 3-1 | 25-22 | 117-130 | 5-4 | 28-27 | 154-193 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-1 | 11-11 | 63-63 | 0-0 | 9-12 | 42-58 | 2-1 | 12-14 | 59-85 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 0-1 | 9-4 | 63-44 | 1-0 | 8-4 | 39-42 | 0-1 | 7-6 | 43-69 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 6-4 | 39-31 | 211-235 | 2-5 | 26-40 | 152-172 | 13-1 | 65-21 | 353-160 | | in all lined games | 6-4 | 39-31 | 211-235 | 2-5 | 26-40 | 152-172 | 9-1 | 50-20 | 297-159 | | when the total is 130 to 139.5 | 1-2 | 17-13 | 67-76 | 0-3 | 8-22 | 66-81 | 2-1 | 20-10 | 86-62 | | as a favorite | 5-4 | 25-20 | 144-168 | 1-5 | 15-27 | 93-108 | 8-1 | 38-7 | 252-68 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 to 15 points | 0-0 | 0-3 | 9-22 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 27-4 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 1-2 | 2-7 | 38-50 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 17-17 | 3-0 | 9-0 | 86-4 | | in all home games | 1-4 | 12-19 | 92-121 | 0-2 | 8-20 | 67-76 | 8-1 | 39-8 | 220-49 | | in home lined games | 1-4 | 12-19 | 92-121 | 0-2 | 8-20 | 67-76 | 4-1 | 24-7 | 170-48 | | in a home game where the total is 135 to 139.5 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 16-17 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 26-8 | | against conference opponents | 1-0 | 23-20 | 126-149 | 1-0 | 17-26 | 97-111 | 1-0 | 27-16 | 174-107 | | in January games | 0-0 | 8-9 | 59-63 | 0-0 | 6-11 | 36-48 | 0-0 | 9-8 | 85-42 | | on Saturday games | 2-2 | 10-14 | 68-88 | 0-3 | 8-15 | 55-56 | 5-0 | 18-11 | 118-57 | | after a conference game | 0-0 | 24-17 | 125-146 | 0-0 | 16-24 | 104-112 | 0-0 | 28-14 | 171-109 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-0 | 16-10 | 79-90 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 56-67 | 0-0 | 16-10 | 113-60 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-3 | 30-21 | 165-172 | 2-5 | 15-33 | 116-142 | 8-1 | 33-19 | 216-139 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-5 | -0.3 | 3-5 | 4-1 | 71.3 | 34.5 | 44.9% | 36.0 | 68.4 | 33.5 | 39.5% | 40.7 | | Road Games | 2-4 | -2.3 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 72.8 | 38.8 | 44.5% | 35.2 | 76.8 | 36.5 | 42.5% | 40.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 0-3 | 1-0 | 70.2 | 36.8 | 41.6% | 37.6 | 71.6 | 34.6 | 39.0% | 44.4 | | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 86.0 | 40.0 | 47.1% | 34.0 | 98.0 | 43.0 | 42.9% | 47.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.3 | 34.5 | 28-61 | 44.9% | 4-13 | 34.8% | 12-19 | 63.1% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 9 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.9 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 67.5% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 38.8 | 28-63 | 44.5% | 5-14 | 36.0% | 11-16 | 70.8% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.4 | 33.5 | 24-61 | 39.5% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 13-18 | 71.6% | 41 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.4 | 33.1 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.8 | 36.5 | 25-60 | 42.5% | 9-22 | 40.0% | 17-23 | 74.1% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-1 | +4.5 | 6-4 | 2-5 | 77.3 | 36.4 | 43.6% | 45.3 | 57.7 | 25.1 | 35.5% | 34.9 | | Home Games | 8-1 | -1.5 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 80.6 | 39.6 | 45.7% | 47.7 | 56.7 | 22.3 | 33.9% | 33.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.5 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 64.8 | 25.0 | 37.6% | 42.6 | 55.0 | 26.6 | 38.3% | 34.6 | | Conference Games | 1-0 | +2 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 70.0 | 26.0 | 41.2% | 37.0 | 61.0 | 34.0 | 44.2% | 32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 36.4 | 28-64 | 43.6% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 14-22 | 62.7% | 45 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 31 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 32.1% | 13-20 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.6 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 45.7% | 8-22 | 37.1% | 12-21 | 56.1% | 48 | 14 | 17 | 16 | 10 | 14 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.7 | 25.1 | 21-58 | 35.5% | 5-17 | 29.6% | 11-19 | 59.4% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.7 | 31.4 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 14-21 | 67.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.7 | 22.3 | 21-61 | 33.9% | 5-18 | 29.9% | 10-17 | 60.7% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ST JOHNS 71.6, CINCINNATI 71 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CINCINNATI is 5-5 against the spread versus ST JOHNS since 1997 | | CINCINNATI is 5-5 straight up against ST JOHNS since 1997 | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CINCINNATI is 2-2 against the spread versus ST JOHNS over the last 3 seasons | | CINCINNATI is 2-2 straight up against ST JOHNS over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| ST JOHNS is 3-2 against the spread versus CINCINNATI since 1997 | | ST JOHNS is 3-2 straight up against CINCINNATI since 1997 | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ST JOHNS is 2-0 against the spread versus CINCINNATI over the last 3 seasons | | ST JOHNS is 2-0 straight up against CINCINNATI over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/8/2012 | CINCINNATI | 76 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 49 | 15 | 16 | | | ST JOHNS | 54 | 134 | Under | 19 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 29 | 6 | 11 | 1/7/2012 | ST JOHNS | 57 | 133.5 | SU ATS | 22 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 43 | 7 | 19 | | | CINCINNATI | 55 | -11.5 | Under | 25 | 20-76 | 26.3% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 42 | 20 | 6 | 2/13/2011 | ST JOHNS | 59 | 128 | SU ATS | 35 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 28 | 6 | 15 | | | CINCINNATI | 57 | -5.5 | Under | 30 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 11-30 | 36.7% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 32 | 15 | 14 | 1/22/2011 | CINCINNATI | 53 | 129 | SU ATS | 28 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 39 | 9 | 17 | | | ST JOHNS | 51 | -2 | Under | 22 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 12-26 | 46.2% | 25 | 6 | 9 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ST JOHNS games 51.8% of the time since 1997. (174-162) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ST JOHNS games 52.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (29-26) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CINCINNATI games 48.5% of the time since 1997. (173-184) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CINCINNATI games 64.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (38-21) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in ST JOHNS games 46.9% of the time since 1997. (120-136) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in ST JOHNS games 61.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-21) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CINCINNATI games 53.2% of the time since 1997. (149-131) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CINCINNATI games 39.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (23-35) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 11/15/2012 - God'sgift Achiuwa expected to redshirt ( None ) | | [F] 11/15/2012 - Orlando Sanchez out indefinitely ( Eligibility ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|