|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-15 | 107-86 | 689-671 | 8-16 | 84-110 | 676-686 | 14-10 | 137-57 | 681-699 | | as an underdog | 3-6 | 20-15 | 367-359 | 2-7 | 9-26 | 369-353 | 3-6 | 15-20 | 207-529 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 6-4 | 52-56 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 47-59 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 36-73 | | in road games | 6-4 | 56-38 | 351-324 | 5-5 | 45-49 | 359-317 | 6-4 | 59-35 | 262-423 | | in a road game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points | 0-0 | 10-4 | 70-64 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 72-64 | 0-0 | 11-3 | 56-81 | | in December games | 5-5 | 15-15 | 106-119 | 3-7 | 10-20 | 107-117 | 7-3 | 22-8 | 113-114 | | first half of the season | 9-15 | 29-30 | 204-235 | 8-16 | 20-39 | 196-241 | 14-10 | 38-21 | 196-249 | | on Friday nights | 2-0 | 19-9 | 113-119 | 2-0 | 13-15 | 113-121 | 2-0 | 21-7 | 115-123 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 1-7 | 16-22 | 121-137 | 1-7 | 19-19 | 128-131 | 4-4 | 26-12 | 123-140 | | against Atlantic division opponents | 3-3 | 23-24 | 182-189 | 3-3 | 25-22 | 190-178 | 5-1 | 30-17 | 194-182 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 1-2 | 35-36 | 157-150 | 1-2 | 39-33 | 170-139 | 2-1 | 50-22 | 192-119 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 5-8 | 51-39 | 340-335 | 4-9 | 33-58 | 330-345 | 9-4 | 56-35 | 293-393 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 3-5 | 34-28 | 183-183 | 1-7 | 23-40 | 160-204 | 3-5 | 41-22 | 178-194 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 15-10 | 99-79 | 670-650 | 13-10 | 85-94 | 672-655 | 19-6 | 98-84 | 629-721 | | as a favorite | 11-9 | 49-48 | 272-297 | 9-9 | 45-51 | 267-300 | 15-5 | 62-36 | 372-209 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 4-0 | 16-3 | 77-72 | 2-2 | 12-7 | 77-71 | 4-0 | 17-2 | 106-45 | | in home games | 9-3 | 50-38 | 336-325 | 6-6 | 46-44 | 333-332 | 11-1 | 57-33 | 389-285 | | in a home game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points | 2-0 | 8-4 | 49-49 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 40-60 | 2-0 | 8-4 | 58-42 | | in December games | 4-6 | 14-13 | 102-106 | 6-3 | 14-11 | 107-107 | 8-2 | 18-9 | 109-108 | | first half of the season | 15-10 | 37-23 | 223-217 | 13-10 | 31-27 | 221-222 | 19-6 | 39-22 | 219-232 | | on Friday nights | 3-2 | 16-19 | 129-130 | 3-2 | 13-23 | 135-130 | 3-2 | 13-23 | 109-161 | | against Central division opponents | 3-2 | 21-20 | 207-191 | 2-3 | 21-20 | 211-191 | 4-1 | 22-19 | 204-210 | | after a division game | 4-0 | 23-12 | 169-166 | 2-2 | 12-25 | 165-173 | 4-0 | 20-17 | 170-179 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 6-7 | 48-47 | 355-342 | 7-6 | 52-43 | 371-332 | 9-4 | 47-49 | 316-400 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 7-4 | 27-21 | 115-126 | 5-5 | 21-26 | 121-120 | 8-3 | 28-20 | 114-133 | | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 1-0 | 7-5 | 57-61 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 66-52 | 1-0 | 7-5 | 52-69 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-4 | 50-35 | 362-307 | 4-6 | 41-46 | 351-324 | 7-3 | 40-48 | 292-400 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=91 points/game | 1-0 | 12-6 | 135-113 | 0-1 | 9-8 | 136-116 | 1-0 | 7-11 | 120-138 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 14-10 | -1.8 | 9-15 | 8-16 | 92.8 | 46.0 | 44.1% | 52.2 | 90.3 | 44.7 | 42.4% | 48.8 | | Road Games | 6-4 | +2.2 | 6-4 | 5-5 | 95.3 | 46.8 | 45.2% | 51.9 | 93.2 | 45.7 | 43.3% | 50.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 87.8 | 43.2 | 42.9% | 48.0 | 86.8 | 43.8 | 42.3% | 52.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 92.8 | 46.0 | 35-80 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 34.1% | 18-23 | 80.4% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 96.9 | 48.2 | 36-81 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 17-23 | 75.9% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 95.3 | 46.8 | 36-80 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 27.4% | 19-23 | 80.3% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 90.3 | 44.7 | 35-82 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 16-21 | 75.8% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.8 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 93.2 | 45.7 | 36-83 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 16-22 | 71.0% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 19-6 | +13.2 | 15-10 | 13-10 | 102.8 | 53.2 | 45.0% | 48.0 | 96.2 | 49.6 | 45.7% | 50.6 | | Home Games | 11-1 | +8.7 | 9-3 | 6-6 | 104.8 | 54.9 | 45.3% | 48.8 | 94.5 | 46.9 | 46.0% | 50.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.7 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 103.0 | 51.8 | 46.3% | 47.2 | 100.2 | 50.2 | 47.7% | 49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 102.8 | 53.2 | 37-83 | 45.0% | 12-29 | 40.4% | 16-21 | 75.0% | 48 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 9 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.6 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 104.8 | 54.9 | 38-84 | 45.3% | 12-29 | 40.7% | 17-23 | 72.8% | 49 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 10 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.2 | 49.6 | 36-79 | 45.7% | 8-21 | 37.1% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 51 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.2 | 49 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 94.5 | 46.9 | 36-78 | 46.0% | 8-23 | 35.6% | 15-19 | 75.6% | 50 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 5 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 95, NEW YORK 95.3 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 11/12/2012 | BOSTON | 95-101 | L | -3 | L | 185 | O | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 41-81 | 50.6% | 37 | 8 | | 11/14/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 112-106 | W | -3 | W | 191.5 | O | 44-88 | 50.0% | 57 | 15 | 42-105 | 40.0% | 58 | 12 | | 11/17/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 80-101 | L | 6.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-89 | 33.7% | 58 | 15 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 51 | 12 | | 11/18/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 94-102 | L | 2 | L | 191 | O | 37-75 | 49.3% | 43 | 19 | 39-79 | 49.4% | 42 | 16 | | 11/21/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 89-93 | L | 1 | L | 192 | U | 38-95 | 40.0% | 62 | 14 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 54 | 23 | | 11/24/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 93-86 | W | 2.5 | W | 192 | U | 32-82 | 39.0% | 57 | 16 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 47 | 9 | | 11/26/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 92-93 | L | -4 | L | 192 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 49 | 15 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 12 | | 11/28/2012 | DALLAS | 101-78 | W | -6 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 40 | 14 | | 12/1/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 93-88 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 59 | 13 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 43 | 11 | | 12/4/2012 | INDIANA | 76-80 | L | -4 | L | 180.5 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 95-85 | W | -3 | W | 183 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | 108-104 | W | -2 | W | 181 | O | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | 93-85 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 89-94 | L | 4 | L | 189 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 54 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 51 | 15 | | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/26/2012 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/13/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 99-89 | W | -7 | W | 188 | P | 41-84 | 48.8% | 41 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 50 | 20 | | 11/15/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 104-100 | W | 5.5 | W | 196 | O | 39-85 | 45.9% | 48 | 7 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 60 | 10 | | 11/16/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 95-105 | L | 6.5 | L | 191 | O | 37-72 | 51.4% | 39 | 13 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 46 | 14 | | 11/18/2012 | INDIANA | 88-76 | W | -7 | W | 185.5 | U | 33-90 | 36.7% | 56 | 8 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 54 | 19 | | 11/20/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 102-80 | W | -7.5 | W | 185.5 | U | 37-83 | 44.6% | 59 | 10 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 13 | | 11/21/2012 | @ DALLAS | 111-114 | L | -3.5 | L | 194 | O | 39-77 | 50.6% | 40 | 14 | 42-85 | 49.4% | 49 | 13 | | 11/23/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 103-131 | L | -4.5 | L | 198.5 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 40 | 15 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 57 | 14 | | 11/25/2012 | DETROIT | 121-100 | W | -11 | W | 190 | O | 38-79 | 48.1% | 43 | 11 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 19 | | 11/26/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 89-96 | L | -1 | L | 192.5 | U | 33-85 | 38.8% | 60 | 14 | 37-91 | 40.7% | 59 | 12 | | 11/28/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 102-88 | W | -2.5 | W | 202.5 | U | 35-73 | 47.9% | 43 | 14 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 42 | 17 | | 11/30/2012 | WASHINGTON | 108-87 | W | -12.5 | W | 190 | O | 43-81 | 53.1% | 43 | 8 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 52 | 17 | | 12/2/2012 | PHOENIX | 106-99 | W | -11.5 | L | 200 | O | 40-90 | 44.4% | 48 | 7 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 52 | 17 | | 12/5/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 100-98 | W | -7.5 | L | 198 | P | 39-92 | 42.4% | 48 | 8 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 55 | 12 | | 12/6/2012 | @ MIAMI | 112-92 | W | 9.5 | W | 199 | O | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 7 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 14 | | 12/8/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 85-93 | L | -2 | L | 188.5 | U | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | | 12/9/2012 | DENVER | 112-106 | W | -4 | W | 203.5 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 53 | 9 | 40-72 | 55.6% | 47 | 16 | | 12/11/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-97 | W | -4 | L | 195.5 | O | 36-78 | 46.2% | 40 | 10 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 45 | 11 | | 12/13/2012 | LA LAKERS | 116-107 | W | -5.5 | W | 205.5 | O | 42-79 | 53.2% | 45 | 6 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 55 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | CLEVELAND | 103-102 | W | -10 | L | 193.5 | O | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 52 | 12 | | 12/17/2012 | HOUSTON | 96-109 | L | -7.5 | L | 209.5 | U | 39-90 | 43.3% | 51 | 17 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 50 | 17 | | 12/19/2012 | BROOKLYN | 100-86 | W | -5.5 | W | 192.5 | U | 38-83 | 45.8% | 51 | 7 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 44 | 12 | | 12/21/2012 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2012 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/25/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/26/2012 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2012 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/1/2013 | PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 31-28 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | CHICAGO is 36-23 straight up against NEW YORK since 1996 | | 29 of 57 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 5-3 against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 5-3 straight up against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 16-13 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | NEW YORK is 16-13 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 15 of 29 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-1 against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | NEW YORK is 2-2 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2012 | NEW YORK | 85 | -2 | Under | 41 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 52 | 14 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 93 | 188.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 18-18 | 100.0% | 54 | 10 | 19 | 04/10/2012 | NEW YORK | 86 | 186.5 | Under | 35 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 43 | 5 | 16 | | | CHICAGO | 98 | -7 | SU ATS | 47 | 39-90 | 43.3% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 59 | 18 | 12 | 04/08/2012 | CHICAGO | 99 | -3 | Over | 45 | 35-89 | 39.3% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 74 | 18 | 19 | | | NEW YORK | 100 | 185.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 39-102 | 38.2% | 8-34 | 23.5% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 58 | 16 | 9 | 03/12/2012 | NEW YORK | 99 | 198.5 | ATS | 50 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 49 | 9 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 104 | -8 | SU Over | 48 | 40-93 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 65 | 22 | 12 | 02/02/2012 | CHICAGO | 105 | -3.5 | SU Over | 55 | 39-74 | 52.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 47 | 9 | 14 | | | NEW YORK | 102 | 189 | ATS | 44 | 44-90 | 48.9% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 46 | 13 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.6% of the time since 1996. (501-551) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 48.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (75-79) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 50.8% of the time since 1996. (541-523) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 47.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (68-74) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 49.8% of the time since 1996. (602-606) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 52% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (89-82) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 51.2% of the time since 1996. (598-569) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 51.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (85-79) | |
|
|
|
|
| [PG] 10/19/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 12/03/2012 - Richard Hamilton out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [F] 12/20/2012 - Taj Gibson injured last game, probable Friday vs. New York ( Ankle ) | |
| [F/C] 10/31/2012 - Amar'e Stoudemire out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 10/31/2012 - Iman Shumpert out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 12/19/2012 - Marcus Camby doubtful Friday vs Chicago ( Foot ) | | [F/C] 12/20/2012 - Rasheed Wallace doubtful Friday vs Chicago ( Foot ) | | [F] 12/19/2012 - Steve Novak probable Friday vs Chicago ( Flu ) | | [F] 12/20/2012 - Carmelo Anthony probable Friday vs Chicago ( Ankle ) |
|
|