|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO | -2 |  | | CHICAGO | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 29-21 | 125-88 | 778-674 | 24-28 | 120-100 | 693-753 | 40-12 | 163-57 | 998-489 | | as an underdog | 2-3 | 21-20 | 150-150 | 4-1 | 30-11 | 149-142 | 1-4 | 14-27 | 112-194 | | as a road underdog of 3 points or less | 2-2 | 14-10 | 60-54 | 3-1 | 17-7 | 55-60 | 2-2 | 13-11 | 58-58 | | in road games | 16-12 | 64-46 | 380-350 | 16-12 | 70-42 | 364-360 | 18-10 | 69-43 | 426-319 | | in a road game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 3-1 | 19-4 | 67-54 | 2-2 | 11-12 | 55-63 | 3-1 | 18-5 | 68-54 | | in February games | 2-2 | 17-11 | 99-84 | 2-2 | 17-12 | 103-72 | 3-1 | 23-6 | 125-65 | | second half of the season | 2-2 | 53-34 | 348-288 | 2-2 | 60-30 | 328-295 | 3-1 | 64-26 | 450-212 | | when playing on back-to-back days | 6-3 | 30-18 | 146-143 | 6-5 | 32-19 | 143-147 | 7-4 | 34-17 | 183-119 | | against Central division opponents | 4-1 | 12-8 | 101-99 | 4-1 | 15-6 | 105-91 | 4-1 | 17-4 | 134-74 | | after a non-conference game | 11-10 | 38-29 | 264-202 | 11-10 | 35-34 | 228-236 | 16-5 | 53-16 | 335-151 | | in non-conference games | 16-6 | 44-22 | 253-213 | 12-10 | 41-29 | 225-241 | 18-4 | 56-14 | 336-152 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 13-8 | 56-32 | 302-259 | 9-12 | 43-47 | 256-303 | 15-6 | 68-22 | 405-173 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 16-6 | 62-34 | 204-163 | 10-13 | 54-46 | 180-187 | 17-6 | 72-28 | 257-118 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 5-2 | 15-10 | 87-74 | 3-4 | 16-10 | 73-82 | 5-2 | 19-7 | 118-52 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 10-10 | 65-49 | 421-382 | 8-12 | 62-54 | 367-434 | 12-8 | 71-45 | 485-347 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 1-0 | 27-27 | 267-225 | 1-0 | 31-24 | 237-250 | 1-0 | 31-24 | 298-209 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 21-28 | 119-99 | 701-684 | 21-29 | 97-123 | 689-699 | 30-20 | 153-67 | 697-709 | | as a favorite | 9-18 | 87-80 | 315-318 | 12-16 | 80-89 | 307-333 | 19-9 | 127-42 | 472-172 | | as a home favorite of 3 points or less | 3-1 | 8-4 | 38-32 | 3-1 | 7-6 | 32-40 | 3-1 | 10-3 | 43-29 | | in home games | 7-19 | 55-56 | 342-355 | 7-19 | 43-69 | 321-377 | 15-11 | 85-27 | 426-281 | | in a home game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 1-4 | 9-12 | 57-64 | 1-4 | 6-15 | 56-65 | 2-3 | 14-7 | 71-50 | | in February games | 3-2 | 19-11 | 109-96 | 3-2 | 17-13 | 110-93 | 2-3 | 21-9 | 104-105 | | second half of the season | 3-2 | 53-36 | 338-294 | 3-2 | 44-45 | 345-289 | 2-3 | 68-21 | 331-315 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 3-9 | 18-24 | 123-139 | 5-7 | 23-19 | 132-131 | 6-6 | 28-14 | 125-142 | | against Southwest division opponents | 1-5 | 11-12 | 43-39 | 1-5 | 8-15 | 41-41 | 1-5 | 15-8 | 40-43 | | after a non-conference game | 7-10 | 40-25 | 242-209 | 6-11 | 25-40 | 227-224 | 12-5 | 49-16 | 224-235 | | in non-conference games | 5-13 | 34-32 | 215-237 | 5-13 | 28-38 | 220-234 | 7-11 | 42-24 | 201-259 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 2-7 | 11-10 | 97-112 | 3-6 | 6-15 | 100-109 | 2-7 | 10-11 | 77-136 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 2-4 | 19-10 | 91-79 | 2-4 | 11-18 | 85-85 | 2-4 | 22-7 | 81-92 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 15-14 | 61-45 | 350-341 | 14-15 | 43-64 | 340-351 | 18-11 | 65-42 | 302-400 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 4-2 | 32-22 | 192-178 | 4-2 | 23-31 | 190-182 | 3-3 | 33-21 | 171-206 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 8-7 | 39-30 | 188-185 | 6-9 | 28-42 | 165-206 | 8-7 | 46-24 | 183-196 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 14-18 | 107-96 | 1-0 | 15-17 | 104-98 | 0-1 | 20-12 | 110-96 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 40-12 | +14 | 29-21 | 24-28 | 104.4 | 51.5 | 48.8% | 48.4 | 95.9 | 47.7 | 44.2% | 49.7 | | Road Games | 18-10 | +1.3 | 16-12 | 16-12 | 103.7 | 49.5 | 47.6% | 48.5 | 99.5 | 48.4 | 44.9% | 51.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.9 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 104.4 | 50.0 | 50.5% | 42.0 | 92.6 | 45.2 | 44.4% | 48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 104.4 | 51.5 | 40-81 | 48.8% | 9-22 | 38.4% | 16-21 | 79.0% | 48 | 8 | 25 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 103.7 | 49.5 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 9-23 | 38.1% | 17-21 | 78.4% | 48 | 8 | 24 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 95.9 | 47.7 | 37-85 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 15-20 | 76.0% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.7 | 49 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.5 | 48.4 | 39-86 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 16-20 | 78.1% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 30-20 | -2.7 | 21-28 | 21-29 | 93.7 | 47.3 | 43.9% | 52.2 | 91.7 | 45.1 | 43.3% | 49.8 | | Home Games | 15-11 | -14.1 | 7-19 | 7-19 | 91.9 | 46.0 | 42.6% | 53.8 | 88.3 | 44.2 | 41.7% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.9 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 94.4 | 51.0 | 43.1% | 47.2 | 99.4 | 51.6 | 50.0% | 50.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 93.7 | 47.3 | 36-81 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 35.1% | 17-22 | 78.3% | 52 | 13 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.6 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 91.9 | 46.0 | 35-82 | 42.6% | 5-13 | 38.8% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 54 | 13 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.7 | 45.1 | 35-81 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 16-22 | 74.5% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.1 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 16-22 | 74.8% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.3 | 44.2 | 34-80 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 16-22 | 76.2% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 95.4, CHICAGO 94.9 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 117-110 | W | -5.5 | W | 204 | O | 46-89 | 51.7% | 47 | 8 | 43-88 | 48.9% | 53 | 16 | | 1/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 83-100 | L | -1 | L | 209 | U | 28-77 | 36.4% | 44 | 13 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 57 | 12 | | 1/5/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 109-86 | W | -13.5 | W | 198 | U | 41-85 | 48.2% | 54 | 15 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 50 | 14 | | 1/7/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 88-95 | L | -8 | L | 193.5 | U | 33-73 | 45.2% | 44 | 19 | 40-83 | 48.2% | 45 | 14 | | 1/9/2013 | LA LAKERS | 108-105 | W | -13.5 | L | 214 | U | 41-84 | 48.8% | 51 | 18 | 44-95 | 46.3% | 51 | 9 | | 1/11/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | 98-101 | L | 2 | L | 187 | O | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 18 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 49 | 14 | | 1/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | 106-88 | W | -12.5 | W | 199 | U | 45-80 | 56.2% | 52 | 17 | 33-89 | 37.1% | 47 | 13 | | 1/16/2013 | MEMPHIS | 103-82 | W | -5.5 | W | 187 | U | 44-76 | 57.9% | 40 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 41 | 13 | | 1/18/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 95-88 | W | -11.5 | L | 201.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 50 | 10 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 46 | 9 | | 1/19/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 98-93 | W | -3.5 | W | 194 | U | 41-86 | 47.7% | 46 | 8 | 35-85 | 41.2% | 59 | 15 | | 1/21/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 90-85 | W | -6 | L | 195 | U | 34-81 | 42.0% | 56 | 14 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 49 | 16 | | 1/23/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 106-102 | W | -8.5 | L | 195 | O | 43-80 | 53.7% | 44 | 8 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 54 | 13 | | 1/25/2013 | @ DALLAS | 113-107 | W | 2 | W | 204.5 | O | 43-89 | 48.3% | 52 | 15 | 42-91 | 46.2% | 50 | 14 | | 1/26/2013 | PHOENIX | 108-99 | W | -9 | T | 200.5 | O | 41-83 | 49.4% | 41 | 9 | 41-81 | 50.6% | 48 | 15 | | 1/30/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 102-78 | W | -14.5 | W | 204.5 | U | 38-69 | 55.1% | 43 | 23 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 23 | | 2/2/2013 | WASHINGTON | 96-86 | W | -12.5 | L | 194 | U | 38-78 | 48.7% | 50 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 52 | 16 | | 2/6/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 104-94 | W | -4.5 | W | 199 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 45 | 13 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 51 | 15 | | 2/8/2013 | @ DETROIT | 109-119 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-81 | 45.7% | 37 | 7 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 58 | 12 | | 2/10/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 111-86 | W | -2.5 | W | 195 | O | 43-73 | 58.9% | 35 | 5 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 45 | 16 | | 2/11/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 186 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-104 | L | -6 | L | 190 | O | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 15 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 55 | 16 | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 108-101 | W | 4.5 | W | 193.5 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 49 | 18 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 49 | 12 | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | 81-97 | L | -8.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 32-88 | 36.4% | 48 | 10 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 57 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 97-58 | W | -4.5 | W | 183.5 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 67 | 13 | 24-82 | 29.3% | 47 | 14 | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | 107-105 | W | -4.5 | L | 183 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 60 | 14 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 53 | 12 | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | 100-99 | W | 2.5 | W | 181.5 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 54 | 21 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 55 | 11 | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | 82-85 | L | 2 | L | 175 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 58 | 15 | 34-84 | 40.5% | 61 | 12 | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | 95-83 | W | 0 | W | 194.5 | U | 39-93 | 41.9% | 52 | 8 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 62 | 15 | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | 85-82 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 43 | 12 | | 1/25/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 103-87 | W | -2.5 | W | 189 | O | 41-88 | 46.6% | 64 | 15 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 44 | 11 | | 1/26/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-86 | L | -1 | L | 184 | U | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 16 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 48 | 9 | | 1/28/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 93-85 | W | -13 | L | 185 | U | 35-78 | 44.9% | 56 | 11 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 51 | 10 | | 1/30/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 104-88 | W | 1 | W | 190.5 | O | 45-91 | 49.5% | 51 | 11 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 51 | 18 | | 2/1/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 89-93 | L | 5 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 13 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 51 | 14 | | 2/2/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 93-76 | W | 7 | W | 182 | U | 38-93 | 40.9% | 62 | 7 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 52 | 14 | | 2/4/2013 | @ INDIANA | 101-111 | L | 5.5 | L | 176 | O | 39-88 | 44.3% | 41 | 10 | 39-74 | 52.7% | 53 | 16 | | 2/7/2013 | @ DENVER | 96-128 | L | 6 | L | 196.5 | O | 38-91 | 41.8% | 44 | 14 | 50-86 | 58.1% | 53 | 10 | | 2/8/2013 | @ UTAH | 93-89 | W | 4.5 | W | 184 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 48 | 9 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 44 | 12 | | 2/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO is 17-13 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | SAN ANTONIO is 19-11 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 19 of 30 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-1 against the spread versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 2-1 straight up against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| SAN ANTONIO is 10-5 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | SAN ANTONIO is 9-6 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 10 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 1-0 against the spread versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 1-0 straight up against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/29/2012 | CHICAGO | 96 | 192 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-88 | 42.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 62 | 13 | 15 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 89 | -2 | Under | 42 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 49 | 10 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN ANTONIO games 51.3% of the time since 1996. (587-558) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN ANTONIO games 51.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (83-78) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.4% of the time since 1996. (508-564) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (82-92) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in SAN ANTONIO games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (647-625) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SAN ANTONIO games 49.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (99-101) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 49.8% of the time since 1996. (613-617) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 51.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (100-93) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 02/11/2013 - Tim Duncan is downgraded to doubtful Monday vs. Chicago ( Knee ) | | [G] 02/11/2013 - Manu Ginobili is downgraded to doubtful Monday vs. Chicago ( Hamstring ) | |
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 02/10/2013 - Joakim Noah probable Monday vs. San Antonio ( Plantar Fasciitis ) | | [G] 02/03/2013 - Kirk Hinrich out indefinitely ( Arm ) | | [G] 02/11/2013 - Marco Belinelli "?" Monday vs. San Antonio ( Foot ) |
|
|