|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 30-31 | 99-111 | 713-692 | 30-31 | 103-107 | 706-704 | 32-30 | 107-107 | 831-606 | | as an underdog | 13-16 | 48-56 | 263-286 | 18-11 | 55-50 | 286-264 | 9-21 | 35-73 | 194-366 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-3 | 9-7 | 44-61 | 3-1 | 11-5 | 55-52 | 1-3 | 6-10 | 26-82 | | in road games | 12-19 | 46-59 | 342-363 | 17-14 | 57-49 | 372-333 | 10-22 | 39-69 | 317-402 | | in a road game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 5-3 | 17-13 | 75-64 | 3-5 | 18-12 | 83-56 | 5-4 | 16-15 | 74-66 | | second half of the season | 8-8 | 43-51 | 336-310 | 8-8 | 46-48 | 316-330 | 7-9 | 41-56 | 397-267 | | in March games | 3-1 | 18-18 | 131-118 | 2-2 | 21-15 | 119-131 | 1-3 | 16-21 | 159-98 | | on Saturday games | 5-9 | 17-24 | 128-127 | 8-6 | 24-17 | 138-118 | 5-9 | 19-22 | 150-113 | | when playing on back-to-back days | 6-8 | 26-29 | 160-161 | 8-6 | 31-24 | 166-156 | 6-8 | 24-31 | 170-158 | | against Atlantic division opponents | 3-2 | 10-12 | 101-75 | 4-1 | 15-7 | 90-90 | 3-3 | 11-12 | 121-62 | | after a non-conference game | 11-12 | 28-43 | 232-231 | 11-12 | 36-35 | 238-226 | 10-14 | 27-45 | 268-212 | | in non-conference games | 14-10 | 41-31 | 245-220 | 13-11 | 44-27 | 252-219 | 14-11 | 43-30 | 293-188 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 6-1 | 11-12 | 91-87 | 3-4 | 16-7 | 93-82 | 5-2 | 11-12 | 108-73 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 3-1 | 11-12 | 55-52 | 0-4 | 6-17 | 46-60 | 4-0 | 11-12 | 55-53 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 13-15 | 48-58 | 369-362 | 14-14 | 56-51 | 365-369 | 10-19 | 41-69 | 367-388 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 7-5 | 24-27 | 210-195 | 6-6 | 28-24 | 189-218 | 5-7 | 19-34 | 204-211 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 10-10 | 34-40 | 228-215 | 10-10 | 30-44 | 210-232 | 9-11 | 34-42 | 237-220 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-3 | 15-21 | 133-124 | 3-2 | 14-23 | 111-146 | 2-3 | 12-26 | 136-130 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 30-28 | 114-97 | 685-668 | 27-30 | 99-114 | 686-675 | 37-22 | 116-100 | 647-737 | | as a favorite | 22-24 | 60-63 | 283-312 | 21-24 | 57-66 | 279-315 | 31-16 | 78-47 | 388-220 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 4-5 | 10-17 | 54-62 | 3-6 | 13-15 | 49-69 | 6-3 | 17-11 | 85-35 | | in home games | 16-15 | 57-50 | 343-337 | 14-17 | 54-55 | 341-343 | 21-10 | 67-42 | 399-294 | | in a home game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 4-6 | 7-9 | 44-38 | 6-4 | 10-6 | 40-44 | 6-4 | 9-7 | 50-34 | | second half of the season | 7-8 | 55-45 | 316-308 | 5-11 | 48-54 | 321-306 | 9-7 | 54-48 | 293-356 | | in March games | 4-1 | 21-19 | 126-125 | 0-5 | 21-19 | 128-127 | 3-2 | 19-21 | 115-144 | | on Saturday games | 2-3 | 12-10 | 89-90 | 2-3 | 8-16 | 92-92 | 3-2 | 13-11 | 84-103 | | against Northwest division opponents | 2-2 | 13-5 | 48-30 | 2-3 | 10-10 | 42-38 | 3-2 | 11-9 | 34-46 | | after a non-conference game | 10-11 | 35-33 | 231-212 | 10-9 | 33-34 | 225-218 | 13-8 | 35-34 | 206-249 | | in non-conference games | 10-11 | 35-32 | 224-222 | 11-11 | 34-36 | 231-219 | 13-9 | 35-35 | 195-261 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 3-4 | 13-14 | 83-85 | 3-4 | 15-12 | 82-88 | 3-4 | 13-14 | 83-89 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 10-14 | 54-45 | 366-317 | 10-14 | 47-54 | 357-332 | 12-12 | 45-57 | 297-409 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 2-4 | 25-21 | 201-170 | 2-4 | 22-25 | 192-183 | 2-4 | 21-26 | 163-222 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 32-30 | -0.8 | 30-31 | 30-31 | 98.5 | 48.6 | 45.1% | 51.3 | 98.6 | 48.5 | 45.6% | 49.5 | | Road Games | 10-22 | -10.6 | 12-19 | 17-14 | 96.6 | 45.6 | 44.0% | 49.6 | 101.6 | 49.4 | 47.6% | 50.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 97.2 | 48.0 | 44.4% | 59.6 | 94.4 | 45.8 | 41.9% | 48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 98.5 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 18-24 | 76.6% | 51 | 13 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 98.5 | 49.5 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 96.6 | 45.6 | 37-83 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 17-23 | 76.3% | 50 | 13 | 22 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 98.6 | 48.5 | 37-81 | 45.6% | 7-18 | 37.0% | 18-24 | 74.8% | 50 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.5 | 49.5 | 37-82 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 101.6 | 49.4 | 39-81 | 47.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 17-23 | 74.1% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 37-22 | 0 | 30-28 | 27-30 | 99.8 | 50.8 | 44.1% | 49.3 | 96.0 | 49.6 | 45.8% | 49.1 | | Home Games | 21-10 | -3 | 16-15 | 14-17 | 101.5 | 51.3 | 44.8% | 48.9 | 95.1 | 47.8 | 45.9% | 48.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 0-5 | 94.4 | 52.4 | 42.9% | 48.4 | 91.2 | 50.2 | 45.3% | 46.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 99.8 | 50.8 | 36-82 | 44.1% | 11-29 | 36.9% | 16-22 | 76.3% | 49 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.6 | 49 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 101.5 | 51.3 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 11-30 | 38.0% | 17-23 | 74.9% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.0 | 49.6 | 36-78 | 45.8% | 8-21 | 36.4% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 49 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.1 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 16-22 | 74.9% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 95.1 | 47.8 | 36-78 | 45.9% | 8-22 | 35.9% | 16-20 | 77.6% | 49 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UTAH 95.9, NEW YORK 95.5 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/28/2013 | HOUSTON | 80-125 | L | -3.5 | L | 208 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 50 | 15 | 47-89 | 52.8% | 52 | 5 | | 1/30/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 104-99 | W | -8.5 | L | 188.5 | O | 34-68 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 12 | | 2/1/2013 | PORTLAND | 86-77 | W | -5 | W | 195 | U | 35-81 | 43.2% | 59 | 13 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 46 | 15 | | 2/2/2013 | @ PORTLAND | 99-105 | L | 4.5 | L | 191.5 | O | 39-90 | 43.3% | 39 | 4 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 61 | 16 | | 2/4/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 98-91 | W | -8.5 | L | 198.5 | U | 38-72 | 52.8% | 50 | 20 | 35-87 | 40.2% | 46 | 13 | | 2/6/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 100-86 | W | -5.5 | W | 200 | U | 39-81 | 48.1% | 62 | 19 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 49 | 16 | | 2/8/2013 | CHICAGO | 89-93 | L | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 37-78 | 47.4% | 44 | 12 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 48 | 9 | | 2/9/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | 109-120 | L | 1.5 | L | 197 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 42 | 18 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 53 | 16 | | 2/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 109-94 | W | 6 | W | 200.5 | O | 42-87 | 48.3% | 50 | 17 | 38-68 | 55.9% | 39 | 20 | | 2/13/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 97-93 | W | 2 | W | 193 | U | 38-87 | 43.7% | 61 | 14 | 29-85 | 34.1% | 58 | 10 | | 2/19/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 115-101 | W | -3.5 | W | 203 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 11 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 49 | 13 | | 2/23/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 94-107 | L | 10 | L | 197.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 43 | 16 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 54 | 20 | | 2/25/2013 | BOSTON | 107-110 | L | -8 | L | 189 | O | 39-88 | 44.3% | 53 | 13 | 41-86 | 47.7% | 46 | 12 | | 2/27/2013 | ATLANTA | 91-102 | L | -3.5 | L | 196.5 | U | 37-83 | 44.6% | 55 | 13 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 9 | | 3/1/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 98-68 | W | -9 | W | 194.5 | U | 38-78 | 48.7% | 71 | 22 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 33 | 12 | | 3/4/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 108-109 | L | 4.5 | W | 200 | O | 40-99 | 40.4% | 70 | 21 | 45-95 | 47.4% | 50 | 17 | | 3/6/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 101-104 | L | 1.5 | L | 201.5 | O | 38-87 | 43.7% | 51 | 15 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 60 | 11 | | 3/8/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 88-89 | L | 4.5 | W | 185.5 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 51 | 14 | 30-81 | 37.0% | 55 | 11 | | 3/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/16/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/18/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/20/2013 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/22/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/24/2013 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/25/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/30/2013 | ORLANDO | 113-97 | W | -8.5 | W | 196.5 | O | 47-82 | 57.3% | 42 | 9 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 37 | 10 | | 2/1/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-86 | W | -4.5 | W | 206 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 56 | 15 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 50 | 13 | | 2/2/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 120-81 | W | -10.5 | W | 204 | U | 47-86 | 54.7% | 58 | 17 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 35 | 18 | | 2/4/2013 | DETROIT | 99-85 | W | -10 | W | 200.5 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 52 | 15 | 38-90 | 42.2% | 52 | 12 | | 2/6/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-106 | L | -4.5 | L | 190 | O | 34-84 | 40.5% | 50 | 9 | 42-79 | 53.2% | 44 | 10 | | 2/8/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 100-94 | W | -6 | T | 196 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 49 | 8 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 49 | 9 | | 2/10/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 88-102 | L | -3.5 | L | 192 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 38 | 16 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 51 | 14 | | 2/13/2013 | TORONTO | 88-92 | L | -8 | L | 198 | U | 28-79 | 35.4% | 63 | 11 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 42 | 10 | | 2/20/2013 | @ INDIANA | 91-125 | L | 4 | L | 185 | O | 29-86 | 33.7% | 48 | 15 | 42-79 | 53.2% | 63 | 21 | | 2/22/2013 | @ TORONTO | 98-100 | L | -1.5 | L | 193 | O | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 16 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 44 | 9 | | 2/24/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 99-93 | W | -11 | L | 189.5 | O | 32-75 | 42.7% | 54 | 12 | 36-85 | 42.4% | 49 | 12 | | 2/27/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 109-105 | W | -7.5 | L | 205 | O | 36-87 | 41.4% | 53 | 10 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 17 | | 3/1/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-88 | W | -3 | W | 193 | U | 35-81 | 43.2% | 50 | 12 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 52 | 13 | | 3/3/2013 | MIAMI | 93-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 196 | U | 32-74 | 43.2% | 46 | 17 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 52 | 14 | | 3/4/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 102-97 | W | -3.5 | W | 204 | U | 36-78 | 46.2% | 51 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | | 3/6/2013 | @ DETROIT | 87-77 | W | -5.5 | W | 195 | U | 31-75 | 41.3% | 51 | 20 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 42 | 20 | | 3/7/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 94-95 | L | 8 | W | 204 | U | 35-86 | 40.7% | 44 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 50 | 16 | | 3/9/2013 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/11/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/14/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/17/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/18/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/20/2013 | ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/22/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/23/2013 | TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 17-11 against the spread versus UTAH since 1996 | | UTAH is 17-12 straight up against NEW YORK since 1996 | | 16 of 29 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-0 against the spread versus UTAH over the last 3 seasons | | NEW YORK is 2-1 straight up against UTAH over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 8-6 against the spread versus UTAH since 1996 | | NEW YORK is 8-7 straight up against UTAH since 1996 | | 9 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 2-0 against the spread versus UTAH over the last 3 seasons | | NEW YORK is 2-0 straight up against UTAH over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/06/2012 | UTAH | 88 | 195 | Under | 38 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 48 | 10 | 20 | | | NEW YORK | 99 | -3 | SU ATS | 51 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 9-28 | 32.1% | 20-31 | 64.5% | 50 | 7 | 17 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.2% of the time since 1996. (573-547) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (86-81) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 50.8% of the time since 1996. (556-539) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 48% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (83-90) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 51.1% of the time since 1996. (632-606) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 56% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (102-80) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 51% of the time since 1996. (612-588) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 50.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (99-98) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Raja Bell out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 12/27/2012 - Rasheed Wallace out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [F] 03/08/2013 - Carmelo Anthony "?" Saturday vs. Utah ( Knee ) |
|
|