|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 20-16 | 60-50 | 230-227 | 15-21 | 45-68 | 223-239 | 17-19 | 74-40 | 251-220 | | as an underdog | 8-12 | 19-23 | 92-116 | 8-12 | 16-26 | 105-103 | 5-15 | 13-29 | 64-150 | | as a road underdog of 9.5 to 12 points | 2-2 | 2-2 | 6-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 3-9 | | in road games | 8-10 | 26-28 | 101-125 | 7-11 | 23-33 | 107-120 | 6-12 | 26-30 | 87-146 | | on Tuesday | 2-3 | 10-13 | 46-43 | 2-3 | 9-16 | 41-50 | 2-3 | 16-9 | 49-43 | | vs. division opponents | 14-10 | 45-27 | 160-142 | 12-12 | 28-46 | 141-158 | 12-12 | 52-23 | 163-145 | | after a division game | 13-10 | 36-35 | 140-154 | 9-14 | 28-44 | 144-152 | 10-13 | 49-24 | 157-145 | | in the first round of the playoffs | 2-0 | 5-2 | 12-13 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 10-15 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 10-15 | | when tied in a playoff series | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-5 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 3-1 | 5-6 | 21-40 | 2-2 | 5-6 | 29-31 | 3-1 | 8-3 | 27-35 | | after allowing 75 points or more | 8-6 | 24-19 | 81-78 | 6-8 | 18-24 | 74-88 | 7-7 | 30-13 | 93-71 | | after scoring 75 points or more | 7-5 | 32-27 | 91-94 | 2-10 | 23-37 | 87-98 | 6-6 | 44-17 | 110-79 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-11 | 22-27 | 110-110 | 7-11 | 17-32 | 106-116 | 4-14 | 22-27 | 97-127 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games | 4-7 | 13-15 | 68-70 | 5-6 | 11-17 | 69-71 | 2-9 | 13-15 | 58-83 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 8-8 | 26-28 | 45-44 | 8-8 | 20-35 | 40-50 | 6-10 | 33-22 | 51-39 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 12-10 | 40-34 | 69-59 | 10-12 | 25-50 | 53-75 | 9-13 | 47-29 | 73-58 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 19-17 | 64-47 | 235-239 | 22-14 | 56-56 | 237-241 | 28-8 | 75-37 | 229-254 | | as a favorite | 17-16 | 39-35 | 107-111 | 21-12 | 41-34 | 116-101 | 26-7 | 56-19 | 138-83 | | as a home favorite of 9.5 to 12 points | 3-3 | 3-4 | 4-10 | 4-2 | 4-3 | 7-6 | 6-0 | 7-0 | 11-3 | | in home games | 9-9 | 33-23 | 119-119 | 13-5 | 28-29 | 122-117 | 17-1 | 43-14 | 139-103 | | on Tuesday | 5-1 | 14-6 | 40-37 | 3-3 | 6-14 | 38-39 | 5-1 | 15-5 | 38-39 | | vs. division opponents | 12-12 | 40-33 | 145-162 | 15-9 | 38-35 | 159-148 | 18-6 | 48-25 | 142-169 | | after a division game | 11-12 | 37-35 | 140-161 | 13-10 | 37-35 | 155-147 | 16-7 | 46-26 | 139-167 | | in the first round of the playoffs | 0-2 | 1-4 | 2-8 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 4-6 | | when tied in a playoff series | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | | revenging a loss versus opponent | 4-0 | 26-15 | 124-116 | 2-2 | 21-20 | 127-113 | 4-0 | 23-18 | 102-141 | | off a upset loss as a favorite | 3-3 | 11-7 | 46-35 | 4-2 | 11-7 | 45-37 | 4-2 | 10-8 | 37-45 | | after allowing 75 points or more | 9-8 | 33-19 | 104-93 | 8-9 | 22-30 | 99-101 | 13-4 | 33-19 | 94-108 | | after scoring 75 points or more | 15-17 | 49-35 | 109-102 | 19-13 | 39-46 | 103-111 | 24-8 | 59-26 | 111-105 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 11-7 | 29-22 | 88-109 | 9-9 | 24-27 | 101-93 | 15-3 | 36-15 | 99-99 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games | 5-5 | 15-14 | 52-68 | 5-5 | 14-15 | 65-53 | 8-2 | 21-8 | 59-62 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-19 | +3.2 | 20-16 | 15-21 | 71.6 | 35.6 | 43.2% | 40.4 | 72.0 | 34.0 | 39.0% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 6-12 | -2 | 8-10 | 7-11 | 68.7 | 32.8 | 41.4% | 40.4 | 74.9 | 36.1 | 40.6% | 42.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 77.2 | 37.8 | 43.2% | 47.2 | 69.8 | 31.0 | 34.6% | 45.0 | | Division Games | 12-12 | +3.8 | 14-10 | 12-12 | 73.7 | 37.1 | 42.8% | 41.3 | 73.3 | 35.3 | 39.4% | 42.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 35.6 | 26-60 | 43.2% | 7-20 | 35.1% | 13-18 | 74.3% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.1 | 39.5 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.7 | 32.8 | 25-59 | 41.4% | 7-21 | 32.6% | 13-17 | 72.3% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.0 | 34.0 | 26-66 | 39.0% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-19 | 76.7% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.4 | 39.3 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 15-19 | 76.5% | 43 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.9 | 36.1 | 27-66 | 40.6% | 6-17 | 37.3% | 15-19 | 77.2% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 28-8 | -3.4 | 19-17 | 22-14 | 85.6 | 43.3 | 46.8% | 46.4 | 76.3 | 39.2 | 40.7% | 40.0 | | Home Games | 17-1 | +5.5 | 9-9 | 13-5 | 89.3 | 43.9 | 47.1% | 48.6 | 75.7 | 38.7 | 40.2% | 40.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.8 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 81.2 | 40.8 | 39.9% | 47.2 | 82.6 | 40.2 | 43.4% | 42.8 | | Division Games | 18-6 | -3.8 | 12-12 | 15-9 | 86.4 | 44.1 | 46.6% | 46.9 | 77.1 | 39.6 | 41.3% | 39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.6 | 43.3 | 32-68 | 46.8% | 6-16 | 39.5% | 15-20 | 75.9% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.3 | 38.6 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 14-19 | 76.8% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 89.3 | 43.9 | 33-71 | 47.1% | 6-16 | 40.5% | 16-22 | 75.6% | 49 | 12 | 22 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.3 | 39.2 | 28-69 | 40.7% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 14-19 | 74.9% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-19 | 76.1% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.7 | 38.7 | 28-70 | 40.2% | 7-21 | 31.5% | 13-18 | 72.6% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.6, MINNESOTA 69.1 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 8/23/2012 | INDIANA | 66-68 | L | -1.5 | L | 145 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 15 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 42 | 13 | | 8/26/2012 | NEW YORK | 84-66 | W | -7.5 | W | 143 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 42 | 15 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 14 | | 8/30/2012 | PHOENIX | 68-75 | L | -14.5 | L | 153 | U | 23-67 | 34.3% | 48 | 14 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 50 | 11 | | 9/6/2012 | TULSA | 101-74 | W | -10 | W | 148 | O | 37-62 | 59.7% | 40 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 37 | 14 | | 9/8/2012 | @ TULSA | 89-66 | W | -7.5 | W | 153.5 | O | 32-55 | 58.2% | 43 | 15 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 34 | 10 | | 9/11/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 61-77 | L | 6 | L | 151 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 21 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 47 | 16 | | 9/12/2012 | @ INDIANA | 48-72 | L | 5.5 | L | 146 | U | 19-48 | 39.6% | 38 | 28 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | | 9/14/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 66-90 | L | 9 | L | 146 | O | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 20 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 10 | | 9/16/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 58-60 | L | 8 | W | 147.5 | U | 24-55 | 43.6% | 42 | 23 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | | 9/18/2012 | CHICAGO | 75-60 | W | 1 | W | 143.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 50 | 16 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 34 | 6 | | 9/21/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-75 | W | -3 | W | 148 | O | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 11 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 45 | 10 | | 9/23/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 71-57 | W | -7.5 | W | 155 | U | 25-60 | 41.7% | 50 | 18 | 22-77 | 28.6% | 47 | 13 | | 9/28/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-78 | L | 10.5 | W | 148.5 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 12 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | | 9/30/2012 | MINNESOTA | 86-79 | W | 5.5 | W | 146 | O | 31-77 | 40.3% | 55 | 16 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 55 | 15 | | 10/2/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/25/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 84-74 | W | -6.5 | W | 162 | U | 31-70 | 44.3% | 56 | 13 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 41 | 12 | | 8/28/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 96-84 | W | -7.5 | W | 163.5 | O | 40-92 | 43.5% | 64 | 12 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 8 | | 8/31/2012 | TULSA | 92-83 | W | -18 | L | 164 | O | 34-77 | 44.2% | 48 | 9 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 34 | 9 | | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 88-77 | W | -9 | W | 170.5 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 39 | 14 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 19 | | 9/7/2012 | ATLANTA | 97-93 | W | -9.5 | L | 166 | O | 33-77 | 42.9% | 59 | 19 | 37-93 | 39.8% | 51 | 13 | | 9/9/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-62 | W | 1 | W | 162 | U | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 14 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 36 | 9 | | 9/11/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 70-83 | L | -6.5 | L | 155.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 30 | 17 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 42 | 13 | | 9/14/2012 | @ INDIANA | 66-64 | W | 4 | W | 155 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 7 | | 9/17/2012 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -5.5 | W | 151.5 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 41 | 14 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 36 | 11 | | 9/20/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-92 | L | 2 | L | 167.5 | O | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 17 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 40 | 15 | | 9/21/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 89-66 | W | -13.5 | W | 169 | U | 33-76 | 43.4% | 53 | 13 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 42 | 19 | | 9/23/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-99 | L | -3.5 | L | 157 | O | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 37 | 7 | | 9/28/2012 | SEATTLE | 78-70 | W | -10.5 | L | 148.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 12 | | 9/30/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 79-86 | L | -5.5 | L | 146 | O | 25-77 | 32.5% | 55 | 15 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 55 | 16 | | 10/2/2012 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| MINNESOTA is 27-23 against the spread versus SEATTLE since 1997 | | SEATTLE is 28-22 straight up against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 25 of 48 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the spread versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | MINNESOTA is 8-6 straight up against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 8 of 14 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| MINNESOTA is 16-9 against the spread versus SEATTLE since 1997 | | MINNESOTA is 16-9 straight up against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 14 of 24 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the spread versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | MINNESOTA is 6-1 straight up against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/2012 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -5.5 | Over | 37 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 55 | 12 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 86 | 146 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 55 | 12 | 16 | 9/28/2012 | SEATTLE | 70 | 148.5 | ATS | 27 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 40 | 6 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 78 | -10.5 | SU Under | 33 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 44 | 3 | 13 | 8/21/2012 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 45 | 10 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 73 | 150 | Over | 43 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | 6/17/2012 | MINNESOTA | 62 | -9.5 | Under | 29 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 47 | 11 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 36 | 5 | 16 | 6/6/2012 | SEATTLE | 55 | 145.5 | Under | 30 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 7 | 15 | | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -10 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-25 | 60.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | 5/27/2012 | SEATTLE | 71 | 143 | Over | 24 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 38 | 8 | 15 | | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 48 | 13 | 16 | 7/29/2011 | SEATTLE | 67 | 148 | Over | 30 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 27 | 5 | 17 | | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -8 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 39 | 6 | 16 | 7/16/2011 | SEATTLE | 62 | 146.5 | Under | 26 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 9-9 | 100.0% | 35 | 5 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 69 | -5 | SU ATS | 35 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 44 | 12 | 11 | 6/24/2011 | MINNESOTA | 55 | 151 | Under | 25 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 43 | 11 | 14 | | | SEATTLE | 65 | -3 | SU ATS | 35 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 41 | 4 | 15 | 6/9/2011 | MINNESOTA | 81 | 151.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 32-56 | 57.1% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 40 | 5 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 74 | -7 | Over | 24 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 11 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SEATTLE games 52.8% of the time since 1997. (186-166) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SEATTLE games 53.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (53-46) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 51% of the time since 1997. (176-169) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 40.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-58) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in SEATTLE games 43.9% of the time since 1997. (145-185) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SEATTLE games 45.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (45-54) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MINNESOTA games 47% of the time since 1997. (150-169) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MINNESOTA games 51.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (54-50) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 10/01/2012 - Sue Bird probable Tuesday vs. Min Lynx ( Hip ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|