|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| UNC-ASHEVILLE | -1 | | | PROVIDENCE | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-1 | 11-4 | 15-8 | 1-0 | 6-8 | 11-10 | 1-3 | 45-27 | 222-234 | | in all neutral court games | 1-1 | 5-2 | 7-2 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 9-14 | | against Big East conference opponents | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-11 | | in November games | 1-1 | 4-1 | 4-2 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 6-11 | 25-53 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 0-1 | 6-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 17-10 | 48-63 | | after a non-conference game | 1-1 | 4-2 | 5-3 | 1-0 | 3-3 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 13-16 | 75-121 | | when playing on a neutral court | 1-1 | 5-2 | 7-2 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 9-14 | | in non-conference games | 1-1 | 5-4 | 8-6 | 1-0 | 5-5 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 12-18 | 68-129 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 0-0 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 15-5 | 65-74 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 27-41 | | in all tournament games | 1-1 | 10-2 | 13-5 | 1-0 | 4-7 | 8-9 | 0-2 | 8-6 | 16-16 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-0 | 2-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 2-8 | 12-56 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-0 | 25-30 | 187-218 | 0-1 | 30-23 | 139-116 | 2-2 | 32-36 | 236-228 | | in all neutral court games | 1-0 | 1-6 | 18-30 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 15-21 | 0-2 | 1-7 | 16-35 | | in November games | 1-0 | 3-5 | 21-32 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 13-5 | 57-28 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 0-0 | 5-5 | 31-41 | 0-0 | 8-1 | 22-26 | 1-1 | 9-5 | 46-43 | | after a non-conference game | 1-0 | 10-8 | 67-76 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 50-35 | 1-2 | 21-8 | 128-65 | | when playing on a neutral court | 1-0 | 1-6 | 18-30 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 15-21 | 0-2 | 1-7 | 16-35 | | in non-conference games | 1-0 | 10-7 | 66-72 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 48-33 | 2-2 | 24-6 | 134-60 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 1-0 | 2-7 | 30-49 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 19-17 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 49-44 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 0-0 | 2-7 | 23-38 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 14-14 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 30-35 | | in all tournament games | 1-0 | 1-6 | 15-28 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 14-23 | 0-2 | 1-7 | 14-30 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 0-0 | 4-8 | 35-37 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 20-20 | 1-0 | 16-3 | 76-19 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-3 | -2 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 65.2 | 29.7 | 44.0% | 35.0 | 71.2 | 33.5 | 41.7% | 36.5 | | Road Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 63.3 | 29.7 | 43.2% | 31.0 | 74.7 | 34.0 | 45.7% | 35.3 | | Last 5 Games | 1-3 | -2 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 65.2 | 29.7 | 44.0% | 35.0 | 71.2 | 33.5 | 41.7% | 36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.2 | 29.7 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 1-9 | 17.1% | 20-28 | 70.5% | 35 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 8 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 72.3 | 33.4 | 24-54 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 31.0% | 19-26 | 72.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.3 | 29.7 | 21-49 | 43.2% | 2-9 | 21.4% | 19-27 | 70.0% | 31 | 7 | 9 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.2 | 33.5 | 24-57 | 41.7% | 7-18 | 39.2% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 36 | 12 | 12 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32.6 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 15-21 | 68.2% | 34 | 11 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.7 | 34.0 | 25-55 | 45.7% | 7-16 | 44.9% | 17-23 | 74.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 2-2 | -2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 68.0 | 32.5 | 43.0% | 38.7 | 61.0 | 26.2 | 39.4% | 35.0 | | Road Games | 0-2 | -2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 63.5 | 25.5 | 41.8% | 35.0 | 66.0 | 27.5 | 44.7% | 35.5 | | Last 5 Games | 2-2 | -2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 68.0 | 32.5 | 43.0% | 38.7 | 61.0 | 26.2 | 39.4% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.0 | 32.5 | 23-53 | 43.0% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 17-23 | 72.0% | 39 | 12 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.1 | 33.7 | 23-55 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 31.1% | 16-22 | 71.6% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.5 | 25.5 | 20-49 | 41.8% | 5-17 | 28.6% | 17-24 | 72.9% | 35 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 5 | 17 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.0 | 26.2 | 22-56 | 39.4% | 5-21 | 26.5% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 35 | 12 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.2 | 29.7 | 24-59 | 40.4% | 5-21 | 25.2% | 13-18 | 70.8% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.0 | 27.5 | 25-57 | 44.7% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 35 | 15 | 9 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UNC-ASHEVILLE 72.5, PROVIDENCE 67.2 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
| No line has been posted for this game. |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 11/14/2012 - Jaron Lane out indefinitely ( Hand ) | |
| [G] 11/17/2012 - Bryce Cotton "?" Sunday vs. NC Asheville ( Ankle ) | | [G] 11/15/2012 - Vincent Council expected to miss Puerto Rico Tip Off ( Leg ) | | [G] 11/02/2012 - Kris Dunn out indefinitely ( Shoulder ) | | [G] 11/02/2012 - Ricky Ledo out for season ( Eligibility ) |
|
|