|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 2-3 | 29-29 | 177-202 | 0-1 | 27-26 | 111-98 | 4-3 | 37-31 | 176-278 | | in all lined games | 2-3 | 29-29 | 177-202 | 0-1 | 27-26 | 111-98 | 3-2 | 31-28 | 127-257 | | as an underdog | 2-0 | 8-10 | 121-138 | 0-1 | 5-12 | 57-61 | 1-1 | 4-14 | 51-212 | | in all neutral court games | 0-0 | 1-3 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-24 | | as a neutral court underdog of 12.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | | as a neutral court underdog of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | | as a neutral court underdog of 15.5 or more points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | | against Big East conference opponents | 1-0 | 2-2 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 6-25 | | in December games | 0-0 | 6-4 | 34-36 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 17-21 | 1-0 | 9-6 | 49-61 | | on Wednesday games | 1-1 | 15-10 | 65-71 | 0-0 | 13-10 | 45-39 | 2-0 | 17-8 | 51-90 | | after a non-conference game | 2-3 | 15-11 | 68-66 | 0-1 | 10-11 | 33-35 | 4-2 | 20-14 | 90-105 | | when playing on a neutral court | 0-0 | 1-3 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-24 | | in non-conference games | 2-3 | 14-10 | 63-61 | 0-1 | 10-9 | 33-31 | 4-3 | 20-14 | 94-102 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 0-2 | 11-13 | 57-46 | 0-0 | 10-10 | 36-31 | 1-1 | 14-13 | 62-57 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 1-1 | 15-20 | 97-125 | 0-0 | 15-18 | 61-66 | 1-1 | 16-22 | 60-183 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-1 | 10-9 | 43-62 | 0-0 | 9-9 | 34-32 | 0-1 | 10-12 | 32-82 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 3-3 | 33-36 | 217-206 | 2-1 | 32-32 | 152-147 | 7-1 | 57-24 | 360-150 | | in all lined games | 3-3 | 33-36 | 217-206 | 2-1 | 32-32 | 152-147 | 5-1 | 45-24 | 282-149 | | as a favorite | 3-2 | 25-31 | 146-140 | 1-1 | 26-25 | 120-103 | 5-0 | 40-16 | 228-64 | | in all neutral court games | 1-1 | 5-6 | 42-42 | 2-0 | 6-5 | 33-39 | 1-1 | 7-4 | 53-33 | | as a neutral court favorite of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 1-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 8-0 | | as a neutral court favorite of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | | in December games | 0-1 | 3-6 | 34-35 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 21-19 | 1-0 | 12-3 | 84-20 | | on Wednesday games | 0-1 | 9-7 | 41-32 | 1-0 | 6-9 | 25-28 | 0-1 | 13-5 | 67-22 | | after a non-conference game | 3-3 | 12-18 | 71-75 | 2-1 | 16-9 | 57-40 | 7-1 | 35-7 | 181-41 | | when playing on a neutral court | 1-1 | 5-6 | 42-42 | 2-0 | 6-5 | 33-39 | 1-1 | 7-4 | 53-33 | | in non-conference games | 3-3 | 13-17 | 70-71 | 2-1 | 16-9 | 55-41 | 7-1 | 36-6 | 189-34 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 0-1 | 22-29 | 171-165 | 1-0 | 26-24 | 126-126 | 0-1 | 31-23 | 228-133 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-3 | +1.8 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 71.1 | 34.9 | 41.3% | 40.1 | 70.6 | 33.9 | 43.8% | 34.7 | | Road Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 64.7 | 34.0 | 38.3% | 37.3 | 67.3 | 32.3 | 45.9% | 34.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 75.4 | 37.8 | 43.1% | 41.6 | 72.8 | 34.6 | 43.8% | 34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 34.9 | 25-59 | 41.3% | 8-24 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 66.2% | 40 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 4 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.8 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-19 | 69.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 34.0 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 7-26 | 25.6% | 12-18 | 65.5% | 37 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.6 | 33.9 | 27-61 | 43.8% | 8-20 | 37.3% | 10-15 | 63.9% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.5 | 25-55 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 13-19 | 69.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.3 | 32.3 | 26-57 | 45.9% | 7-18 | 40.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-1 | +1 | 3-3 | 2-1 | 75.9 | 34.1 | 50.9% | 33.7 | 55.9 | 28.0 | 40.4% | 28.0 | | Road Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 73.5 | 37.0 | 52.3% | 30.0 | 63.0 | 25.0 | 42.1% | 32.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 1-3 | 2-0 | 72.6 | 31.8 | 47.5% | 33.8 | 59.0 | 29.8 | 42.0% | 31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 34.1 | 29-56 | 50.9% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 13-18 | 68.9% | 34 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.6 | 32.2 | 25-54 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 34.1% | 15-21 | 70.0% | 34 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.5 | 37.0 | 28-54 | 52.3% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 10-14 | 75.0% | 30 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 55.9 | 28.0 | 19-48 | 40.4% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 11-15 | 76.0% | 28 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 4 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 32.2 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 13-19 | 71.8% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.0 | 25.0 | 22-53 | 42.1% | 3-15 | 22.6% | 14-18 | 80.6% | 32 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DUQUESNE 69.7, PITTSBURGH 69.6 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH is 8-6 against the spread versus DUQUESNE since 1997 | | PITTSBURGH is 13-2 straight up against DUQUESNE since 1997 | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PITTSBURGH is 2-0 against the spread versus DUQUESNE over the last 3 seasons | | PITTSBURGH is 2-0 straight up against DUQUESNE over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2011 | PITTSBURGH | 80 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-54 | 53.7% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 39 | 13 | 23 | | N | DUQUESNE | 69 | 151.5 | Under | 27 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 15 | 3 | 12 | 12/1/2010 | PITTSBURGH | 80 | -11 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 56 | 19 | 19 | | N | DUQUESNE | 66 | 146.5 | Under | 28 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 35 | 13 | 10 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DUQUESNE games 54% of the time since 1997. (163-139) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DUQUESNE games 45.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-23) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PITTSBURGH games 47.2% of the time since 1997. (159-178) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PITTSBURGH games 55.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (31-25) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 11/02/2012 - Mamadou Datt expected to miss first semester ( Academics ) | |
| [G/F] 11/26/2012 - Trey Zeigler out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | | [G] 11/13/2012 - John Johnson has left the team ( None ) |
|
|