|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| WI-MILWAUKEE | | | | IL-CHICAGO | -6 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 6-10 | 39-38 | 215-184 | 2-0 | 31-29 | 118-111 | 5-14 | 44-42 | 252-225 | | in all lined games | 6-10 | 39-38 | 215-184 | 2-0 | 31-29 | 118-111 | 3-14 | 38-42 | 202-211 | | as an underdog | 6-4 | 21-18 | 111-84 | 2-0 | 15-16 | 55-54 | 2-9 | 13-29 | 51-149 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 3-3 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 6-18 | | in road games | 4-4 | 19-20 | 111-88 | 2-0 | 16-16 | 58-55 | 0-8 | 15-26 | 84-143 | | in road lined games | 4-4 | 19-20 | 111-88 | 2-0 | 16-16 | 58-55 | 0-8 | 15-26 | 71-135 | | against conference opponents | 3-1 | 27-16 | 153-110 | 0-0 | 19-20 | 77-74 | 1-4 | 27-18 | 157-115 | | in January games | 3-1 | 11-11 | 76-55 | 0-0 | 9-9 | 40-32 | 1-4 | 11-12 | 85-54 | | on Wednesday games | 0-2 | 3-4 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 12-17 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 25-26 | | after a conference game | 2-1 | 24-19 | 146-109 | 0-0 | 20-19 | 79-71 | 1-3 | 23-22 | 148-123 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-1 | 9-8 | 58-42 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 26-25 | 1-2 | 7-10 | 49-56 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-3 | 24-19 | 122-108 | 1-0 | 19-18 | 69-65 | 1-7 | 18-27 | 93-152 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 1-1 | 13-12 | 72-60 | 0-0 | 11-12 | 41-40 | 1-2 | 12-14 | 57-79 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-1 | 6-5 | 41-32 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 22-20 | 0-1 | 7-4 | 32-43 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 3-3 | 12-12 | 73-64 | 1-0 | 8-12 | 34-44 | 1-5 | 10-16 | 51-95 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 7-3 | 29-22 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 19-15 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 35-18 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-4 | 9-11 | 47-45 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 27-28 | 1-4 | 14-7 | 70-39 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-7 | 36-37 | 232-195 | 0-1 | 29-25 | 127-105 | 11-8 | 26-54 | 228-248 | | in all lined games | 11-7 | 36-37 | 232-195 | 0-1 | 29-25 | 127-105 | 10-8 | 23-53 | 201-240 | | as a favorite | 5-3 | 7-6 | 101-72 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 46-37 | 6-2 | 12-3 | 138-43 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-0 | 1-1 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 11-5 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 21-8 | | in all home games | 5-2 | 15-14 | 103-73 | 0-0 | 9-13 | 54-42 | 7-1 | 18-17 | 141-71 | | in home lined games | 5-2 | 15-14 | 103-73 | 0-0 | 9-13 | 54-42 | 6-1 | 15-16 | 119-66 | | against conference opponents | 3-3 | 22-22 | 133-132 | 0-0 | 21-15 | 89-64 | 2-4 | 7-37 | 118-156 | | in January games | 3-3 | 10-11 | 53-74 | 0-0 | 8-7 | 34-32 | 2-4 | 4-17 | 51-81 | | on Wednesday games | 2-1 | 5-4 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 15-16 | 3-1 | 5-6 | 26-24 | | after a conference game | 2-4 | 18-25 | 131-127 | 0-0 | 20-15 | 88-65 | 2-4 | 8-36 | 120-153 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-1 | 18-15 | 64-74 | 0-0 | 19-11 | 57-34 | 1-2 | 7-27 | 50-94 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 1-1 | 4-3 | 26-29 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 20-9 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 29-32 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 6-2 | 16-14 | 57-57 | 0-1 | 11-11 | 30-33 | 6-3 | 12-22 | 51-73 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 2-2 | 10-11 | 80-64 | 0-0 | 11-6 | 53-33 | 1-3 | 8-14 | 113-58 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 1-0 | 5-3 | 45-36 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 37-17 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 55-31 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 4-5 | 34-26 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 23-14 | 1-0 | 2-7 | 34-27 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 4-2 | 9-9 | 53-43 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 35-24 | 4-2 | 8-11 | 64-42 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-14 | -10.8 | 6-10 | 2-0 | 62.7 | 28.7 | 37.9% | 34.4 | 69.5 | 31.6 | 44.4% | 38.4 | | Road Games | 0-10 | -9.2 | 4-6 | 2-0 | 56.4 | 26.9 | 36.1% | 33.2 | 70.5 | 32.2 | 45.4% | 37.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 60.6 | 29.2 | 38.3% | 35.0 | 67.0 | 30.0 | 44.0% | 37.2 | | Conference Games | 1-4 | -2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 60.6 | 29.2 | 38.3% | 35.0 | 67.0 | 30.0 | 44.0% | 37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 62.7 | 28.7 | 21-56 | 37.9% | 7-23 | 30.2% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.5 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 15-21 | 71.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 56.4 | 26.9 | 20-55 | 36.1% | 6-22 | 27.6% | 10-16 | 63.5% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 5 | 16 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.5 | 31.6 | 26-59 | 44.4% | 5-17 | 27.6% | 12-17 | 72.2% | 38 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.2 | 31.3 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 14-20 | 70.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.5 | 32.2 | 26-57 | 45.4% | 4-16 | 26.9% | 14-20 | 73.6% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-8 | +7.8 | 11-7 | 0-1 | 61.5 | 27.1 | 38.9% | 33.2 | 60.4 | 28.5 | 39.9% | 36.2 | | Home Games | 7-1 | +5 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 66.2 | 28.9 | 40.2% | 35.4 | 54.6 | 24.0 | 35.6% | 37.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 55.0 | 25.2 | 37.3% | 29.6 | 69.0 | 34.0 | 45.3% | 34.0 | | Conference Games | 2-4 | -2.4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 56.7 | 25.8 | 37.8% | 31.7 | 67.5 | 33.2 | 43.8% | 33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 61.5 | 27.1 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 13-17 | 76.0% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 29.8 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 13-18 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.2 | 28.9 | 23-57 | 40.2% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 13-17 | 80.5% | 35 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.4 | 28.5 | 21-52 | 39.9% | 5-17 | 31.1% | 13-19 | 71.1% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.8 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 70.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 54.6 | 24.0 | 19-54 | 35.6% | 5-16 | 28.0% | 11-15 | 75.4% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WI-MILWAUKEE 69.9, IL-CHICAGO 70.2 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| IL-CHICAGO is 19-17 against the spread versus WI-MILWAUKEE since 1997 | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 22-14 straight up against IL-CHICAGO since 1997 | | 10 of 20 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WI-MILWAUKEE is 4-1 against the spread versus IL-CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 5-0 straight up against IL-CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| IL-CHICAGO is 9-7 against the spread versus WI-MILWAUKEE since 1997 | | IL-CHICAGO is 9-7 straight up against WI-MILWAUKEE since 1997 | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WI-MILWAUKEE is 2-0 against the spread versus IL-CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 2-0 straight up against IL-CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/28/2012 | IL-CHICAGO | 55 | 126.5 | Under | 14 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 33 | 7 | 15 | | | WI-MILWAUKEE | 68 | -12.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 13-24 | 54.2% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 2/23/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 72 | -5 | SU ATS | 29 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 14-25 | 56.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 32 | 2 | 10 | | | IL-CHICAGO | 61 | 126 | Over | 32 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 9-9 | 100.0% | 29 | 5 | 11 | 12/3/2011 | IL-CHICAGO | 71 | 126.5 | ATS | 19 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 48 | 9 | 10 | | | WI-MILWAUKEE | 73 | -14.5 | SU Over | 25 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-33 | 57.6% | 36 | 7 | 10 | 2/12/2011 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 70 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-22 | 59.1% | 37 | 8 | 8 | | | IL-CHICAGO | 59 | 130 | Under | 24 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 1/13/2011 | IL-CHICAGO | 75 | 129.5 | Over | 34 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 29 | 12 | 12 | | | WI-MILWAUKEE | 87 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 23-34 | 67.6% | 28 | 8 | 10 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-MILWAUKEE games 49% of the time since 1997. (164-171) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-MILWAUKEE games 52.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-30) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in IL-CHICAGO games 54.8% of the time since 1997. (189-156) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in IL-CHICAGO games 62.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-23) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 01/19/2013 - Thierno Niang out indefinitely ( Back ) | |
| [G] 01/23/2013 - Daniel Barnes "?" Wednesday vs. Wisc Milwaukee ( Knee ) | | [C] 01/18/2013 - Matt Gorski out indefinitely ( Foot ) |
|
|