|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| COLL OF CHARLESTON | -7 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-9 | 42-37 | 177-145 | 0-2 | 29-33 | 112-118 | 17-7 | 62-30 | 345-147 | | in all lined games | 11-9 | 42-37 | 177-145 | 0-2 | 29-33 | 112-118 | 14-6 | 52-29 | 204-123 | | as a favorite | 7-8 | 26-31 | 99-102 | 0-1 | 19-26 | 64-78 | 11-4 | 41-18 | 154-51 | | as a road favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-1 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 5-1 | 1-0 | 2-3 | 7-5 | | in road games | 5-3 | 20-16 | 89-55 | 0-0 | 13-15 | 52-50 | 8-2 | 25-16 | 121-86 | | in road lined games | 5-3 | 20-16 | 89-55 | 0-0 | 13-15 | 52-50 | 6-2 | 20-16 | 75-72 | | against conference opponents | 6-6 | 23-28 | 113-110 | 0-0 | 20-20 | 74-85 | 9-3 | 35-17 | 212-88 | | in February games | 1-1 | 10-8 | 49-41 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 33-32 | 2-0 | 15-4 | 90-35 | | on Saturday games | 6-1 | 20-9 | 74-44 | 0-0 | 11-12 | 36-48 | 8-1 | 29-5 | 128-47 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 5-2 | 16-14 | 61-55 | 0-0 | 9-15 | 35-49 | 5-2 | 24-8 | 122-50 | | after a conference game | 6-6 | 23-26 | 111-104 | 0-1 | 19-20 | 75-81 | 8-4 | 34-17 | 208-90 | | off a win against a conference rival | 3-5 | 11-21 | 62-79 | 0-1 | 15-11 | 47-53 | 5-3 | 22-12 | 100-53 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 7-6 | 18-19 | 69-55 | 0-0 | 12-14 | 44-43 | 13-2 | 32-9 | 174-31 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 4-3 | 11-13 | 44-39 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 26-34 | 6-1 | 17-8 | 92-24 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-9 | 31-37 | 153-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 9-14 | 36-51 | 252-233 | | in all lined games | 10-9 | 31-37 | 153-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 6-13 | 24-45 | 155-178 | | as an underdog | 6-7 | 19-26 | 74-92 | 0-0 | 15-16 | 55-60 | 2-11 | 9-37 | 43-127 | | as a home underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-1 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 3-2 | | in all home games | 4-6 | 15-16 | 69-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 6-7 | 27-18 | 171-67 | | in home lined games | 4-6 | 15-16 | 69-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 4-6 | 17-14 | 94-49 | | against conference opponents | 5-5 | 22-25 | 108-125 | 0-0 | 19-18 | 79-81 | 4-6 | 21-27 | 154-139 | | in February games | 2-0 | 7-10 | 37-54 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 33-30 | 1-1 | 6-12 | 54-61 | | on Saturday games | 3-4 | 13-16 | 57-77 | 0-0 | 10-12 | 46-46 | 3-5 | 11-20 | 95-93 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 1-4 | 9-15 | 53-80 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 48-42 | 1-4 | 9-19 | 91-96 | | after a conference game | 4-5 | 17-27 | 96-119 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 75-74 | 4-6 | 17-31 | 147-144 | | revenging a blowout loss vs opponent of 20 points or more | 0-1 | 4-3 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 12-14 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 2-3 | 14-10 | 36-37 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 25-26 | 1-5 | 13-13 | 54-45 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-2 | 7-12 | 49-70 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 42-40 | 1-2 | 10-10 | 61-63 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 2-2 | 6-7 | 45-44 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 35-21 | 1-3 | 8-10 | 65-58 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-5 | 10-12 | 70-83 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 50-47 | 0-7 | 6-18 | 72-126 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 0-2 | 5-5 | 35-47 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 30-25 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 39-62 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-1 | 2-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 10-11 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 1-4 | 4-5 | 16-25 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 12-15 | 0-6 | 3-8 | 19-35 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-7 | +2.2 | 11-9 | 0-2 | 65.5 | 30.7 | 44.5% | 37.1 | 61.3 | 28.0 | 40.5% | 31.6 | | Road Games | 8-2 | +1.4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 67.4 | 31.7 | 46.5% | 35.5 | 61.7 | 28.7 | 41.4% | 30.8 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 74.0 | 32.2 | 47.1% | 39.8 | 57.4 | 25.4 | 38.2% | 29.4 | | Conference Games | 9-3 | +3.4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 68.1 | 31.3 | 44.3% | 38.0 | 59.6 | 26.4 | 39.7% | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.5 | 30.7 | 23-52 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 36.3% | 13-20 | 66.2% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 31.5 | 23-55 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.4 | 31.7 | 24-52 | 46.5% | 7-16 | 40.6% | 12-17 | 68.8% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.3 | 28.0 | 23-56 | 40.5% | 5-16 | 29.0% | 11-15 | 72.6% | 32 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.9 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.7 | 28.7 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 5-17 | 29.8% | 11-15 | 73.4% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-14 | -3.8 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 68.9 | 31.7 | 41.1% | 38.0 | 71.9 | 34.7 | 44.7% | 34.1 | | Home Games | 6-7 | -1.8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 73.1 | 32.8 | 41.7% | 40.2 | 72.2 | 34.5 | 44.8% | 32.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 71.4 | 33.0 | 40.9% | 36.6 | 77.4 | 40.0 | 46.8% | 34.8 | | Conference Games | 4-6 | -1.1 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 70.6 | 31.3 | 40.9% | 36.2 | 77.7 | 39.3 | 47.1% | 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 31.7 | 24-57 | 41.1% | 5-18 | 29.7% | 16-24 | 67.3% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.3 | 32.5 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 15-21 | 69.2% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.1 | 32.8 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 5-19 | 24.5% | 18-28 | 66.6% | 40 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.9 | 34.7 | 25-57 | 44.7% | 9-25 | 36.2% | 12-18 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 7-20 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.2 | 34.5 | 25-55 | 44.8% | 9-25 | 37.3% | 14-18 | 73.9% | 33 | 7 | 18 | 22 | 8 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLL OF CHARLESTON 68.2, UT-CHATTANOOGA 66.6 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 10-10 against the spread versus COLL OF CHARLESTON since 1997 | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 17-10 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | 10 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 2-1 against the spread versus COLL OF CHARLESTON over the last 3 seasons | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 2-1 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 4-4 against the spread versus COLL OF CHARLESTON since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 7-5 straight up against COLL OF CHARLESTON since 1997 | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 against the spread versus COLL OF CHARLESTON over the last 3 seasons | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 straight up against COLL OF CHARLESTON over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/12/2013 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 59 | | | 24 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 32 | 6 | 15 | | | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 86 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 46 | 10 | 13 | 12/3/2011 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 85 | 146 | ATS | 26 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 14-26 | 53.8% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 43 | 6 | 17 | | | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 87 | -12.5 | SU Over | 21 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 12-43 | 27.9% | 23-31 | 74.2% | 46 | 9 | 12 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in COLL OF CHARLESTON games 48.1% of the time since 1997. (126-136) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in COLL OF CHARLESTON games 44.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (28-35) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 55.3% of the time since 1997. (142-115) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 57.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-22) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|