|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 15-9 | 45-42 | 104-92 | 3-2 | 30-34 | 88-75 | 20-7 | 65-32 | 310-200 | | in all lined games | 15-9 | 45-42 | 104-92 | 3-2 | 30-34 | 88-75 | 17-7 | 58-31 | 105-96 | | as a favorite | 13-7 | 28-29 | 44-44 | 2-2 | 18-23 | 35-36 | 15-5 | 43-16 | 68-23 | | as a road favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-3 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 6-3 | | in road games | 8-5 | 21-22 | 48-43 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 39-34 | 8-5 | 22-22 | 98-127 | | in road lined games | 8-5 | 21-22 | 48-43 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 39-34 | 8-5 | 22-21 | 33-60 | | against conference opponents | 9-4 | 29-23 | 60-50 | 3-0 | 21-22 | 59-43 | 10-3 | 39-15 | 190-96 | | in February games | 4-1 | 10-10 | 23-23 | 2-0 | 13-6 | 33-13 | 4-1 | 15-7 | 86-41 | | on Tuesday nights | 3-0 | 6-6 | 10-10 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 13-6 | 3-0 | 9-3 | 26-19 | | after a conference game | 9-3 | 29-21 | 60-54 | 3-0 | 21-22 | 61-46 | 10-2 | 38-16 | 186-99 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 1-1 | 5-3 | 13-7 | 1-0 | 4-3 | 12-6 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 18-24 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-0 | 9-5 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 23-19 | 2-0 | 11-3 | 26-20 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 1-1 | 4-5 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 8-13 | 3-0 | 9-2 | 39-23 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 8-7 | 27-26 | 67-59 | 2-1 | 18-20 | 57-46 | 10-5 | 32-22 | 104-132 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 5-3 | 16-13 | 37-34 | 2-0 | 13-11 | 43-22 | 6-2 | 19-11 | 67-59 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 4-1 | 12-5 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 22-9 | 5-0 | 15-2 | 27-20 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 5-5 | 16-14 | 35-30 | 0-0 | 10-10 | 33-22 | 7-3 | 22-8 | 42-57 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 5-1 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 14-12 | 6-0 | 16-2 | 44-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 6-2 | 12-13 | 22-23 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 20-17 | 7-1 | 21-4 | 68-18 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 12-12 | 37-42 | 191-198 | 2-0 | 25-27 | 106-106 | 14-12 | 37-50 | 216-259 | | in all lined games | 12-12 | 37-42 | 191-198 | 2-0 | 25-27 | 106-106 | 12-12 | 30-50 | 166-242 | | as an underdog | 5-4 | 22-22 | 118-134 | 1-0 | 17-19 | 66-68 | 2-7 | 8-37 | 62-203 | | as a home underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-1 | 0-6 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-6 | 5-17 | | in all home games | 3-7 | 13-22 | 85-81 | 1-0 | 12-11 | 45-49 | 7-4 | 20-21 | 138-85 | | in home lined games | 3-7 | 13-22 | 85-81 | 1-0 | 12-11 | 45-49 | 6-4 | 15-21 | 100-80 | | against conference opponents | 5-8 | 20-30 | 134-133 | 1-0 | 20-18 | 78-75 | 4-9 | 12-39 | 106-174 | | in February games | 3-2 | 11-10 | 62-46 | 0-0 | 11-5 | 31-30 | 1-4 | 6-16 | 50-67 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-1 | 3-2 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 13-7 | 0-1 | 0-5 | 25-23 | | after a conference game | 4-8 | 18-30 | 123-129 | 1-0 | 19-16 | 76-70 | 4-9 | 14-37 | 112-167 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-3 | 3-8 | 46-53 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 28-28 | 0-3 | 3-8 | 47-58 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 4-6 | 10-16 | 45-61 | 2-0 | 7-9 | 33-31 | 5-6 | 12-17 | 41-78 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-5 | 18-20 | 95-108 | 2-0 | 15-13 | 58-51 | 4-7 | 7-31 | 54-166 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 3-3 | 9-13 | 55-54 | 1-0 | 12-5 | 39-24 | 1-5 | 2-20 | 27-89 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-3 | 5-9 | 38-33 | 1-0 | 8-2 | 26-12 | 1-4 | 1-13 | 19-53 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-5 | 8-16 | 56-55 | 2-0 | 10-7 | 31-28 | 3-6 | 3-21 | 34-85 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 20-7 | -0.2 | 15-9 | 3-2 | 71.1 | 33.4 | 47.5% | 33.3 | 62.0 | 28.5 | 41.2% | 28.9 | | Road Games | 8-5 | +1.6 | 8-5 | 2-1 | 68.4 | 30.4 | 46.5% | 32.2 | 67.0 | 31.1 | 43.7% | 28.6 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.2 | 4-1 | 2-0 | 75.8 | 39.2 | 54.0% | 28.6 | 63.6 | 26.4 | 41.8% | 28.4 | | Conference Games | 10-3 | +1 | 9-4 | 3-0 | 73.6 | 34.2 | 48.4% | 32.2 | 65.0 | 29.2 | 42.3% | 30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 33.4 | 24-50 | 47.5% | 7-20 | 36.6% | 16-21 | 73.6% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 31.3 | 23-53 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.4 | 30.4 | 23-49 | 46.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 17-23 | 73.5% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.0 | 28.5 | 21-52 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 33.4% | 15-20 | 72.7% | 29 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.4 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 31.1 | 23-52 | 43.7% | 5-13 | 38.6% | 16-22 | 73.1% | 29 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 14-12 | -0.3 | 12-12 | 2-0 | 62.8 | 28.1 | 43.7% | 33.4 | 60.8 | 26.7 | 42.4% | 30.6 | | Home Games | 7-4 | -0.2 | 3-7 | 1-0 | 67.5 | 31.8 | 45.8% | 33.9 | 61.2 | 26.5 | 43.3% | 29.8 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 61.0 | 29.0 | 43.4% | 30.4 | 65.2 | 27.0 | 46.9% | 32.0 | | Conference Games | 4-9 | -6.2 | 5-8 | 1-0 | 61.9 | 28.1 | 43.8% | 32.2 | 63.4 | 27.5 | 44.9% | 30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 62.8 | 28.1 | 22-51 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 12-17 | 72.7% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.4 | 23-54 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.5 | 31.8 | 25-54 | 45.8% | 6-17 | 35.5% | 12-16 | 73.9% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 5 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.8 | 26.7 | 22-52 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 11-16 | 69.2% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 64.1 | 29.2 | 22-54 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 13-19 | 70.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.2 | 26.5 | 23-53 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 9-14 | 69.8% | 30 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: VALPARAISO 69.6, LOYOLA-IL 68 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| LOYOLA-IL is 6-5 against the spread versus VALPARAISO since 1997 | | LOYOLA-IL is 7-6 straight up against VALPARAISO since 1997 | | 5 of 10 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOYOLA-IL is 3-2 against the spread versus VALPARAISO over the last 3 seasons | | VALPARAISO is 3-2 straight up against LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| VALPARAISO is 3-2 against the spread versus LOYOLA-IL since 1997 | | LOYOLA-IL is 3-3 straight up against VALPARAISO since 1997 | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| VALPARAISO is 2-0 against the spread versus LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | VALPARAISO is 2-0 straight up against LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2013 | LOYOLA-IL | 63 | | SU ATS | 26 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 34 | 8 | 14 | | | VALPARAISO | 54 | -8.5 | | 24 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 32 | 9 | 13 | 2/21/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 62 | 120.5 | ATS | 24 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 35 | 11 | 12 | | | VALPARAISO | 66 | -11.5 | SU Over | 26 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 28 | 3 | 13 | 1/19/2012 | VALPARAISO | 69 | -6 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 35 | 6 | 13 | | | LOYOLA-IL | 48 | 123.5 | Under | 22 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 22 | 5 | 8 | 2/24/2011 | LOYOLA-IL | 68 | 137 | SU ATS | 34 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 37 | 11 | 11 | | | VALPARAISO | 48 | -9.5 | Under | 26 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 2-23 | 8.7% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 27 | 10 | 12 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VALPARAISO games 54.4% of the time since 1997. (86-72) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VALPARAISO games 53.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (38-33) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-IL games 49.3% of the time since 1997. (151-155) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-IL games 55.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (37-30) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 02/09/2013 - Alex Rossi out indefinitely ( Heart ) | |
| [F] 02/18/2013 - Ben Averkamp "?" Tuesday vs. Valparaiso ( Concussion ) | | [G] 02/16/2013 - Cully Payne "?" Tuesday vs. Valparaiso ( Leg ) |
|
|