|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-12 | 46-37 | 224-240 | 10-8 | 45-35 | 160-170 | 11-11 | 59-32 | 317-198 | | in all lined games | 9-12 | 46-37 | 224-240 | 10-8 | 45-35 | 160-170 | 11-11 | 53-32 | 276-198 | | when the total is 120 to 129.5 | 3-3 | 15-10 | 45-52 | 5-1 | 17-8 | 58-42 | 3-3 | 17-8 | 57-44 | | as a favorite | 7-7 | 32-24 | 152-144 | 4-6 | 28-24 | 96-94 | 9-5 | 42-15 | 228-73 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less or pick | 1-0 | 2-1 | 15-11 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 11-5 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 16-10 | | in road games | 2-3 | 15-12 | 69-86 | 4-1 | 16-11 | 53-58 | 2-4 | 14-14 | 65-97 | | in road lined games | 2-3 | 15-12 | 69-86 | 4-1 | 16-11 | 53-58 | 2-4 | 14-14 | 62-97 | | in a road game where the total is 120 to 129.5 | 1-2 | 5-4 | 12-17 | 3-0 | 7-2 | 21-10 | 1-2 | 5-4 | 12-19 | | against conference opponents | 4-4 | 25-21 | 130-147 | 5-4 | 31-17 | 97-108 | 4-5 | 29-19 | 151-133 | | in February games | 0-1 | 11-4 | 54-53 | 1-0 | 10-6 | 37-40 | 0-1 | 11-5 | 62-48 | | on Tuesday nights | 1-2 | 8-7 | 34-29 | 1-1 | 11-4 | 29-25 | 2-1 | 11-5 | 42-28 | | after a conference game | 4-4 | 26-20 | 135-140 | 6-2 | 30-17 | 100-105 | 4-4 | 28-19 | 157-126 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-2 | 11-6 | 63-60 | 2-2 | 9-9 | 37-50 | 2-2 | 12-6 | 66-62 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 4-2 | 9-4 | 42-44 | 3-3 | 5-9 | 29-38 | 4-2 | 10-4 | 55-38 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-0 | 9-2 | 41-41 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 21-28 | 3-0 | 11-2 | 89-14 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 0-0 | 4-1 | 24-20 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 13-14 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 34-10 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-1 | 6-2 | 23-18 | 2-1 | 5-3 | 15-9 | 2-1 | 6-2 | 29-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 4-2 | 9-3 | 31-32 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 21-16 | 4-2 | 9-3 | 56-16 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-9 | 33-36 | 206-202 | 7-7 | 34-35 | 123-133 | 8-13 | 39-48 | 220-268 | | in all lined games | 7-9 | 33-36 | 206-202 | 7-7 | 34-35 | 123-133 | 4-13 | 28-46 | 157-262 | | when the total is 120 to 129.5 | 3-7 | 15-20 | 43-49 | 6-4 | 22-15 | 47-47 | 1-9 | 12-25 | 35-59 | | as an underdog | 4-6 | 20-27 | 134-146 | 4-6 | 25-26 | 89-97 | 0-10 | 11-40 | 65-223 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick | 0-0 | 1-1 | 10-14 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 11-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 10-17 | | in all home games | 4-5 | 18-15 | 95-88 | 4-3 | 16-15 | 55-59 | 7-6 | 30-18 | 157-100 | | in home lined games | 4-5 | 18-15 | 95-88 | 4-3 | 16-15 | 55-59 | 3-6 | 19-16 | 95-96 | | in a home game where the total is 120 to 129.5 | 2-4 | 8-10 | 25-24 | 4-2 | 13-7 | 27-24 | 1-5 | 7-13 | 23-28 | | against conference opponents | 4-5 | 25-23 | 135-143 | 4-5 | 24-26 | 87-97 | 0-9 | 16-34 | 84-200 | | in February games | 0-0 | 7-6 | 49-55 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 28-35 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 35-73 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 2-3 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 19-19 | | after a conference game | 3-5 | 23-22 | 131-139 | 4-4 | 25-23 | 85-97 | 1-8 | 17-33 | 91-192 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 3-3 | 13-9 | 59-58 | 1-4 | 9-14 | 43-41 | 1-5 | 11-13 | 41-84 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 3-5 | 13-17 | 87-96 | 4-4 | 17-15 | 59-65 | 0-8 | 8-24 | 56-133 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 3-3 | 6-7 | 45-49 | 3-3 | 6-7 | 25-34 | 0-6 | 4-10 | 26-76 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 3-4 | 12-11 | 53-65 | 4-3 | 16-9 | 50-43 | 0-7 | 4-21 | 29-94 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 5-5 | 18-17 | 90-99 | 4-6 | 21-16 | 71-63 | 3-9 | 11-28 | 65-140 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-11 | -10.4 | 9-12 | 10-8 | 65.5 | 30.8 | 41.4% | 40.5 | 63.8 | 29.1 | 39.6% | 34.5 | | Road Games | 2-7 | -8.9 | 2-6 | 6-2 | 62.6 | 30.0 | 38.8% | 41.2 | 69.7 | 31.6 | 41.8% | 37.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.1 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 63.4 | 29.0 | 39.9% | 38.6 | 70.8 | 32.2 | 42.1% | 36.0 | | Conference Games | 4-5 | +0.3 | 4-4 | 5-4 | 61.8 | 28.4 | 39.8% | 38.9 | 68.8 | 31.9 | 41.8% | 36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.5 | 30.8 | 25-59 | 41.4% | 4-14 | 31.4% | 12-19 | 63.1% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.1 | 29.1 | 23-55 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 32.4% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.6 | 30.0 | 23-60 | 38.8% | 5-16 | 31.8% | 11-18 | 60.1% | 41 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 4 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.8 | 29.1 | 23-57 | 39.6% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 70.1% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31.6 | 24-54 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.7 | 31.6 | 24-58 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 69.3% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-13 | -7.2 | 7-9 | 7-7 | 61.2 | 26.8 | 39.0% | 35.5 | 67.5 | 29.0 | 42.5% | 33.0 | | Home Games | 7-6 | -3.2 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 65.4 | 28.3 | 40.5% | 36.5 | 66.0 | 27.8 | 41.2% | 31.4 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 60.6 | 23.2 | 39.2% | 31.0 | 72.4 | 31.6 | 44.8% | 35.0 | | Conference Games | 0-9 | -7 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 55.7 | 22.3 | 36.5% | 33.1 | 69.6 | 32.7 | 44.8% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 61.2 | 26.8 | 21-54 | 39.0% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 14-21 | 69.6% | 36 | 9 | 9 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 29.6 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-18 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.4 | 28.3 | 22-53 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 29.6% | 17-24 | 69.5% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.5 | 29.0 | 21-50 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 36.8% | 18-25 | 70.9% | 33 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.6 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.0 | 27.8 | 21-50 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 18-24 | 74.5% | 31 | 5 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PURDUE 76.4, PENN ST 75.5 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| PURDUE is 16-12 against the spread versus PENN ST since 1997 | | PURDUE is 20-8 straight up against PENN ST since 1997 | | 13 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PURDUE is 3-2 against the spread versus PENN ST over the last 3 seasons | | PURDUE is 4-1 straight up against PENN ST over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| PENN ST is 8-5 against the spread versus PURDUE since 1997 | | PURDUE is 7-6 straight up against PENN ST since 1997 | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PENN ST is 1-1 against the spread versus PURDUE over the last 3 seasons | | PENN ST is 1-1 straight up against PURDUE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/13/2013 | PENN ST | 42 | 127 | Under | 22 | 15-58 | 25.9% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 33 | 11 | 14 | | | PURDUE | 60 | -11 | SU ATS | 30 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 42 | 8 | 14 | 2/29/2012 | PENN ST | 56 | 131 | Over | 32 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 17 | 4 | 13 | | | PURDUE | 80 | -11 | SU ATS | 37 | 27-47 | 57.4% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 31 | 8 | 13 | 1/5/2012 | PURDUE | 45 | -7.5 | Under | 18 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 26 | 6 | 12 | | | PENN ST | 65 | 124.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 38 | 10 | 10 | 1/19/2011 | PENN ST | 62 | 128 | ATS | 28 | 24-46 | 52.2% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 30 | 7 | 13 | | | PURDUE | 63 | -13 | SU Under | 34 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 19 | 5 | 3 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PURDUE games 50.5% of the time since 1997. (188-184) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PURDUE games 47.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-33) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PENN ST games 49.6% of the time since 1997. (166-169) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PENN ST games 44.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (26-33) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in PURDUE games 49% of the time since 1997. (144-150) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in PURDUE games 44.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-41) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in PENN ST games 47.5% of the time since 1997. (104-115) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in PENN ST games 50.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (32-31) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 02/05/2013 - Jay Simpson out for season ( Foot ) | |
| [G] 11/18/2012 - Tim Frazier out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|