|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 14-8 | 44-41 | 103-91 | 2-2 | 29-34 | 87-75 | 19-6 | 64-31 | 309-199 | | in all lined games | 14-8 | 44-41 | 103-91 | 2-2 | 29-34 | 87-75 | 16-6 | 57-30 | 104-95 | | as a road underdog of 3 points or less or pick | 0-0 | 1-2 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 7-8 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less or pick | 1-0 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 5-2 | 1-0 | 1-4 | 2-6 | | in road games | 7-5 | 20-22 | 47-43 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 39-34 | 7-5 | 21-22 | 97-127 | | in road lined games | 7-5 | 20-22 | 47-43 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 39-34 | 7-5 | 21-21 | 32-60 | | against conference opponents | 8-3 | 28-22 | 59-49 | 2-0 | 20-22 | 58-43 | 9-2 | 38-14 | 189-95 | | in February games | 3-0 | 9-9 | 22-22 | 1-0 | 12-6 | 32-13 | 3-0 | 14-6 | 85-40 | | on Tuesday nights | 2-0 | 5-6 | 9-10 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 13-6 | 2-0 | 8-3 | 25-19 | | after a conference game | 8-2 | 28-20 | 59-53 | 2-0 | 20-22 | 60-46 | 9-1 | 37-15 | 185-98 | | off a win against a conference rival | 6-2 | 19-15 | 28-34 | 2-0 | 13-17 | 33-26 | 7-1 | 25-12 | 44-32 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 2-1 | 7-12 | 19-19 | 1-1 | 6-11 | 18-16 | 5-0 | 13-10 | 81-40 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-6 | 26-25 | 66-58 | 1-1 | 17-20 | 56-46 | 9-4 | 31-21 | 103-131 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 4-2 | 15-12 | 36-33 | 1-0 | 12-11 | 42-22 | 5-1 | 18-10 | 66-58 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 3-1 | 11-5 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 22-9 | 4-0 | 14-2 | 26-20 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-5 | 15-14 | 34-30 | 0-0 | 10-10 | 33-22 | 6-3 | 21-8 | 41-57 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 4-1 | 10-7 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 14-12 | 5-0 | 15-2 | 43-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 5-2 | 11-13 | 21-23 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 20-17 | 6-1 | 20-4 | 67-18 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 14-8 | 40-39 | 210-189 | 1-0 | 31-27 | 106-117 | 17-8 | 49-41 | 249-223 | | in all lined games | 14-8 | 40-39 | 210-189 | 1-0 | 31-27 | 106-117 | 14-8 | 41-40 | 203-210 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick | 0-0 | 3-0 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 17-11 | | as a home favorite of 3 points or less or pick | 1-0 | 1-4 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 10-3 | 1-0 | 2-3 | 15-11 | | in all home games | 4-4 | 17-19 | 100-83 | 0-0 | 17-9 | 49-50 | 9-2 | 32-12 | 167-60 | | in home lined games | 4-4 | 17-19 | 100-83 | 0-0 | 17-9 | 49-50 | 6-2 | 24-12 | 127-58 | | against conference opponents | 7-5 | 23-26 | 139-129 | 1-0 | 21-18 | 78-75 | 8-4 | 26-25 | 144-134 | | in February games | 2-1 | 7-11 | 50-58 | 0-0 | 10-6 | 37-27 | 3-0 | 9-11 | 60-57 | | on Tuesday nights | 1-0 | 4-2 | 22-21 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 7-15 | 1-0 | 5-1 | 26-23 | | after a conference game | 7-5 | 23-26 | 126-128 | 1-0 | 21-18 | 72-75 | 8-4 | 27-24 | 141-136 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 2-1 | 8-10 | 51-54 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 30-24 | 1-2 | 5-13 | 63-53 | | off a win against a conference rival | 5-2 | 10-14 | 59-71 | 1-0 | 11-8 | 42-44 | 5-2 | 13-12 | 74-69 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 8-5 | 19-18 | 86-70 | 1-0 | 13-10 | 48-55 | 10-5 | 23-18 | 102-73 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-5 | 21-19 | 114-101 | 1-0 | 19-10 | 65-50 | 6-6 | 16-25 | 89-135 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 5-4 | 14-13 | 68-59 | 1-0 | 11-8 | 39-30 | 5-4 | 12-16 | 56-75 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 3-2 | 5-9 | 28-32 | 1-0 | 6-3 | 18-14 | 3-2 | 5-9 | 17-43 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 5-3 | 11-15 | 59-55 | 1-0 | 13-5 | 34-23 | 4-4 | 9-17 | 40-75 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 19-6 | +0.6 | 14-8 | 2-2 | 71.1 | 33.2 | 47.4% | 33.6 | 61.2 | 28.6 | 40.6% | 29.0 | | Road Games | 7-5 | +0.6 | 7-5 | 2-1 | 68.4 | 30.1 | 46.3% | 32.3 | 67.5 | 31.3 | 43.9% | 28.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.4 | 4-1 | 1-0 | 75.6 | 37.4 | 50.4% | 29.6 | 62.8 | 29.6 | 39.9% | 31.4 | | Conference Games | 9-2 | +1.8 | 8-3 | 2-0 | 74.1 | 34.0 | 48.2% | 32.5 | 63.6 | 29.6 | 41.2% | 30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 33.2 | 24-50 | 47.4% | 7-20 | 36.8% | 16-22 | 73.0% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 31.3 | 23-53 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 69.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.4 | 30.1 | 23-49 | 46.3% | 6-19 | 32.0% | 17-23 | 72.3% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.2 | 28.6 | 21-51 | 40.6% | 5-14 | 33.4% | 15-21 | 72.2% | 29 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 64.8 | 29.8 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 69.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.5 | 31.3 | 23-52 | 43.9% | 5-13 | 39.9% | 16-23 | 72.4% | 29 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-8 | +9.4 | 14-8 | 1-0 | 62.5 | 29.3 | 43.2% | 30.4 | 58.5 | 26.3 | 41.3% | 32.0 | | Home Games | 9-2 | +1.4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 64.7 | 28.5 | 44.4% | 30.1 | 56.5 | 26.1 | 42.1% | 30.3 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 64.2 | 27.4 | 42.2% | 29.0 | 62.8 | 30.6 | 43.7% | 33.4 | | Conference Games | 8-4 | +6.2 | 7-5 | 1-0 | 63.1 | 29.1 | 43.1% | 30.5 | 60.9 | 28.6 | 42.0% | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 62.5 | 29.3 | 22-51 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 12-17 | 70.0% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30 | 23-54 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 64.7 | 28.5 | 22-50 | 44.4% | 5-19 | 28.8% | 15-21 | 69.2% | 30 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.5 | 26.3 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 15-21 | 70.7% | 32 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.5 | 30.2 | 23-53 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 70.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.5 | 26.1 | 18-43 | 42.1% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 30 | 7 | 9 | 20 | 5 | 20 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: VALPARAISO 69.3, WRIGHT ST 67.9 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| WRIGHT ST is 6-6 against the spread versus VALPARAISO since 1997 | | VALPARAISO is 7-6 straight up against WRIGHT ST since 1997 | | 8 of 12 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WRIGHT ST is 3-1 against the spread versus VALPARAISO over the last 3 seasons | | VALPARAISO is 4-1 straight up against WRIGHT ST over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| VALPARAISO is 4-2 against the spread versus WRIGHT ST since 1997 | | WRIGHT ST is 4-2 straight up against VALPARAISO since 1997 | | 4 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WRIGHT ST is 1-1 against the spread versus VALPARAISO over the last 3 seasons | | WRIGHT ST is 1-1 straight up against VALPARAISO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/19/2013 | WRIGHT ST | 63 | | ATS | 34 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 32 | 4 | 9 | | | VALPARAISO | 69 | -9 | SU | 30 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 28 | 2 | 7 | 2/4/2012 | WRIGHT ST | 54 | 126 | | 21 | 16-54 | 29.6% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 26 | 7 | 13 | | | VALPARAISO | 63 | -9 | SU Under | 31 | 21-32 | 65.6% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 31 | 1 | 24 | 1/8/2012 | VALPARAISO | 55 | -2 | Under | 33 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 31 | 7 | 16 | | | WRIGHT ST | 73 | 129.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 35 | 5 | 9 | 2/12/2011 | WRIGHT ST | 56 | 128.5 | ATS | 24 | 19-42 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 21 | 4 | 13 | | | VALPARAISO | 58 | -7 | SU Under | 30 | 20-38 | 52.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 26 | 4 | 18 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VALPARAISO games 54.5% of the time since 1997. (85-71) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VALPARAISO games 53.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (37-32) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WRIGHT ST games 51.3% of the time since 1997. (163-155) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WRIGHT ST games 52.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (34-31) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 02/11/2013 - Matt Kenney probable Tuesday vs. Wright State ( Back ) | | [G] 02/11/2013 - LaVonte Dority "?" Tuesday vs. Wright State ( Ankle ) | | [F] 02/11/2013 - Ryan Broekhoff probable Tuesday vs. Wright State ( Illness ) | | [F] 02/11/2013 - Kevin Van Wijk probable Tuesday vs. Wright State ( Undisclosed ) | | [G] 02/09/2013 - Alex Rossi out indefinitely ( Heart ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|