|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| WI-GREEN BAY | -3 | | | IL-CHICAGO | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-8 | 41-31 | 201-194 | 0-2 | 26-29 | 113-101 | 11-10 | 40-43 | 247-232 | | in all lined games | 10-8 | 41-31 | 201-194 | 0-2 | 26-29 | 113-100 | 9-10 | 33-42 | 197-216 | | as a favorite | 7-4 | 18-14 | 92-86 | 0-1 | 7-15 | 42-51 | 8-3 | 25-8 | 134-52 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less or pick | 0-1 | 1-2 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 16-12 | | in road games | 3-5 | 20-17 | 91-95 | 0-2 | 15-16 | 60-46 | 1-8 | 8-33 | 66-151 | | in road lined games | 3-5 | 20-17 | 91-95 | 0-2 | 15-16 | 60-46 | 1-8 | 8-32 | 55-141 | | against conference opponents | 4-3 | 27-16 | 132-131 | 0-1 | 20-18 | 80-69 | 5-3 | 23-23 | 135-139 | | in January games | 4-3 | 14-7 | 67-63 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 35-32 | 5-3 | 14-10 | 75-61 | | when playing with 5 or 6 days rest | 2-1 | 6-4 | 24-24 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 18-10 | 1-2 | 4-8 | 27-34 | | after a conference game | 4-2 | 24-15 | 129-119 | 0-1 | 17-18 | 78-63 | 6-2 | 23-22 | 138-135 | | off a win against a conference rival | 2-2 | 11-9 | 61-63 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 45-32 | 3-1 | 11-11 | 71-63 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 4-4 | 11-9 | 67-75 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 32-25 | 5-4 | 7-15 | 80-81 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-6 | 27-20 | 102-116 | 0-1 | 18-16 | 66-48 | 6-7 | 18-32 | 83-159 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-2 | 13-8 | 54-68 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 43-25 | 3-1 | 10-12 | 43-85 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-2 | 5-6 | 24-38 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 22-17 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 18-47 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-6 | 15-14 | 56-60 | 0-1 | 9-12 | 34-32 | 4-6 | 13-20 | 45-82 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-1 | 7-5 | 25-27 | 0-1 | 4-8 | 19-17 | 2-0 | 9-4 | 27-28 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 2-2 | 11-8 | 45-40 | 0-1 | 6-11 | 26-31 | 3-1 | 13-8 | 60-41 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 13-7 | 38-37 | 234-195 | 0-1 | 29-25 | 127-105 | 13-8 | 28-54 | 230-248 | | in all lined games | 13-7 | 38-37 | 234-195 | 0-1 | 29-25 | 127-105 | 12-8 | 25-53 | 203-240 | | as an underdog | 7-4 | 30-31 | 127-120 | 0-1 | 27-21 | 77-67 | 5-6 | 12-50 | 59-194 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick | 1-0 | 4-1 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 1-0 | 3-3 | 13-11 | | in all home games | 6-2 | 16-14 | 104-73 | 0-0 | 9-13 | 54-42 | 8-1 | 19-17 | 142-71 | | in home lined games | 6-2 | 16-14 | 104-73 | 0-0 | 9-13 | 54-42 | 7-1 | 16-16 | 120-66 | | against conference opponents | 5-3 | 24-22 | 135-132 | 0-0 | 21-15 | 89-64 | 4-4 | 9-37 | 120-156 | | in January games | 5-3 | 12-11 | 55-74 | 0-0 | 8-7 | 34-32 | 4-4 | 6-17 | 53-81 | | after a conference game | 4-4 | 20-25 | 133-127 | 0-0 | 20-15 | 88-65 | 4-4 | 10-36 | 122-153 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 4-3 | 14-16 | 55-53 | 0-0 | 11-11 | 33-29 | 4-3 | 9-22 | 46-66 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-2 | 1-7 | 64-49 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 30-29 | 1-2 | 1-7 | 64-55 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 8-4 | 11-11 | 54-60 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 25-31 | 8-5 | 9-16 | 59-69 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 8-2 | 18-14 | 59-57 | 0-1 | 11-11 | 30-33 | 8-3 | 14-22 | 53-73 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 9-4 | 23-19 | 122-112 | 0-1 | 14-16 | 61-65 | 8-5 | 12-32 | 78-166 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-2 | 10-11 | 62-55 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 32-32 | 2-2 | 2-19 | 34-86 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-1 | 6-11 | 36-41 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 27-22 | 2-1 | 3-14 | 26-53 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 9-2 | 15-13 | 67-67 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 45-34 | 9-2 | 11-18 | 51-89 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-10 | -2 | 10-8 | 0-2 | 66.3 | 32.0 | 43.2% | 35.8 | 62.6 | 30.0 | 40.2% | 31.3 | | Road Games | 2-9 | -6.8 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 65.1 | 30.2 | 41.4% | 35.6 | 70.1 | 34.2 | 44.3% | 32.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 66.4 | 30.6 | 43.4% | 38.4 | 56.4 | 27.6 | 35.4% | 29.0 | | Conference Games | 5-3 | +2 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 64.9 | 30.2 | 44.0% | 36.7 | 59.4 | 28.1 | 36.1% | 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 66.3 | 32.0 | 23-52 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 31.6% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 31.1 | 23-54 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 34.2% | 14-19 | 70.9% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.1 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 4-16 | 28.1% | 14-19 | 74.0% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.6 | 30.0 | 21-53 | 40.2% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 13-18 | 73.8% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.5 | 30.9 | 23-55 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 13-18 | 71.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 34.2 | 23-53 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 36.1% | 17-23 | 74.8% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-8 | +11.6 | 13-7 | 0-1 | 61.1 | 27.0 | 38.9% | 33.6 | 59.3 | 28.4 | 39.2% | 35.8 | | Home Games | 8-1 | +6 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 65.6 | 28.4 | 39.9% | 36.4 | 54.1 | 26.0 | 35.2% | 37.1 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 54.0 | 25.2 | 37.4% | 33.4 | 61.8 | 33.0 | 39.8% | 34.4 | | Conference Games | 4-4 | +1.4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 56.9 | 25.7 | 38.1% | 33.1 | 63.0 | 31.9 | 40.8% | 33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 61.1 | 27.0 | 21-53 | 38.9% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 13-17 | 75.2% | 34 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 29.7 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.6 | 28.4 | 23-57 | 39.9% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 13-17 | 77.8% | 36 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.3 | 28.4 | 21-53 | 39.2% | 5-18 | 29.3% | 13-18 | 71.4% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.2 | 29.5 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 70.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 54.1 | 26.0 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 5-19 | 26.9% | 11-15 | 74.8% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 4 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WI-GREEN BAY 69.6, IL-CHICAGO 70.1 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| WI-GREEN BAY is 17-14 against the spread versus IL-CHICAGO since 1997 | | WI-GREEN BAY is 18-14 straight up against IL-CHICAGO since 1997 | | 12 of 17 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| IL-CHICAGO is 3-2 against the spread versus WI-GREEN BAY over the last 3 seasons | | WI-GREEN BAY is 4-1 straight up against IL-CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| IL-CHICAGO is 7-7 against the spread versus WI-GREEN BAY since 1997 | | IL-CHICAGO is 9-6 straight up against WI-GREEN BAY since 1997 | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| IL-CHICAGO is 1-1 against the spread versus WI-GREEN BAY over the last 3 seasons | | IL-CHICAGO is 1-1 straight up against WI-GREEN BAY over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/12/2013 | IL-CHICAGO | 47 | | ATS | 26 | 16-47 | 34.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 30 | 4 | 9 | | | WI-GREEN BAY | 53 | -7.5 | SU | 26 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 36 | 8 | 6 | 2/25/2012 | WI-GREEN BAY | 71 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 12 | | | IL-CHICAGO | 63 | 132 | Over | 27 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 12/1/2011 | IL-CHICAGO | 68 | 129 | ATS | 26 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 40 | 14 | 15 | | | WI-GREEN BAY | 71 | -12.5 | SU Over | 33 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 16-28 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 7 | 2/10/2011 | WI-GREEN BAY | 61 | -2 | Under | 26 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-16 | 12.5% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 35 | 14 | 14 | | | IL-CHICAGO | 63 | 133.5 | SU ATS | 24 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 41 | 6 | 22 | 1/15/2011 | IL-CHICAGO | 50 | 134 | Under | 22 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 0-12 | 0.0% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 37 | 13 | 20 | | | WI-GREEN BAY | 74 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 39 | 12 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-GREEN BAY games 54.2% of the time since 1997. (168-142) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-GREEN BAY games 53.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (31-27) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in IL-CHICAGO games 54.6% of the time since 1997. (189-157) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in IL-CHICAGO games 61.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-24) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G/F] 11/24/2012 - Josh Humphrey out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [C] 01/26/2013 - Matt Gorski has left the team ( Dismissed ) |
|
|