|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-11 | 36-41 | 190-197 | 2-0 | 25-27 | 106-106 | 13-11 | 36-49 | 215-258 | | in all lined games | 11-11 | 36-41 | 190-197 | 2-0 | 25-27 | 106-106 | 11-11 | 29-49 | 165-241 | | as a favorite | 6-7 | 14-19 | 67-60 | 1-0 | 8-8 | 38-36 | 9-4 | 21-12 | 98-35 | | as a road favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 0-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 6-2 | | in road games | 8-3 | 23-18 | 95-104 | 1-0 | 13-16 | 56-53 | 6-6 | 16-27 | 66-159 | | in road lined games | 8-3 | 23-18 | 95-104 | 1-0 | 13-16 | 56-53 | 5-6 | 14-27 | 56-147 | | against conference opponents | 4-7 | 19-29 | 133-132 | 1-0 | 20-18 | 78-75 | 3-8 | 11-38 | 105-173 | | in February games | 2-1 | 10-9 | 61-45 | 0-0 | 11-5 | 31-30 | 0-3 | 5-15 | 49-66 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 3-1 | 19-16 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 25-22 | | after a conference game | 3-7 | 17-29 | 122-128 | 1-0 | 19-16 | 76-70 | 3-8 | 13-36 | 111-166 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-4 | 12-20 | 71-70 | 1-0 | 14-14 | 46-41 | 2-5 | 8-27 | 57-100 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 4-5 | 10-15 | 45-60 | 2-0 | 7-9 | 33-31 | 5-5 | 12-16 | 41-77 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 4-2 | 15-13 | 54-63 | 1-0 | 11-12 | 37-34 | 5-2 | 12-19 | 52-87 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-1 | 9-8 | 38-33 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 19-21 | 1-1 | 6-12 | 29-52 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-3 | 11-13 | 70-70 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 40-44 | 6-1 | 19-11 | 120-66 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 0-1 | 6-5 | 44-35 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 25-26 | 2-0 | 8-5 | 59-30 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-3 | 5-9 | 29-28 | 1-0 | 6-4 | 22-15 | 1-3 | 5-9 | 30-29 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 5-4 | 9-14 | 37-42 | 1-0 | 7-7 | 27-20 | 6-3 | 12-13 | 55-44 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-14 | 41-42 | 217-188 | 2-1 | 31-30 | 118-112 | 5-20 | 44-48 | 252-231 | | in all lined games | 8-14 | 41-42 | 217-188 | 2-1 | 31-30 | 118-112 | 3-20 | 38-48 | 202-217 | | as an underdog | 8-8 | 23-22 | 113-88 | 2-1 | 15-17 | 55-55 | 2-15 | 13-35 | 51-155 | | as a home underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-0 | 1-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 7-8 | | in all home games | 3-6 | 19-16 | 89-85 | 0-1 | 15-12 | 54-50 | 5-7 | 27-15 | 151-70 | | in home lined games | 3-6 | 19-16 | 89-85 | 0-1 | 15-12 | 54-50 | 3-7 | 21-15 | 115-64 | | against conference opponents | 5-5 | 29-20 | 155-114 | 0-1 | 19-21 | 77-75 | 1-10 | 27-24 | 157-121 | | in February games | 1-2 | 14-4 | 62-45 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 34-23 | 0-3 | 12-6 | 57-56 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 3-6 | 17-20 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 2-7 | 31-24 | | after a conference game | 4-5 | 26-23 | 148-113 | 0-1 | 20-20 | 79-72 | 1-9 | 23-28 | 148-129 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 4-1 | 12-6 | 59-43 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 27-31 | 0-5 | 7-11 | 49-56 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 4-5 | 11-12 | 60-46 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 26-26 | 1-8 | 7-16 | 49-62 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 6-6 | 18-16 | 53-39 | 1-1 | 14-9 | 29-25 | 3-10 | 17-21 | 49-67 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 5-4 | 5-4 | 29-16 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 8-10 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 20-37 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-6 | 26-22 | 124-111 | 1-0 | 19-18 | 69-65 | 1-12 | 18-32 | 93-157 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 3-4 | 15-15 | 74-63 | 0-0 | 11-12 | 41-40 | 1-7 | 12-19 | 57-84 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-5 | 7-9 | 42-36 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 22-21 | 0-6 | 7-9 | 32-48 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-7 | 13-16 | 74-68 | 1-1 | 8-13 | 34-45 | 1-10 | 10-21 | 51-100 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-2 | 8-5 | 30-24 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 19-15 | 0-3 | 8-5 | 35-21 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 2-6 | 10-13 | 48-47 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 27-28 | 1-7 | 14-10 | 70-42 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-11 | +0.7 | 11-11 | 2-0 | 63.0 | 27.8 | 44.0% | 33.4 | 60.4 | 27.1 | 42.2% | 30.1 | | Road Games | 7-7 | +1.9 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 59.9 | 25.3 | 42.6% | 33.1 | 59.8 | 27.3 | 41.4% | 30.3 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 64.4 | 28.2 | 47.8% | 30.2 | 67.0 | 29.4 | 47.8% | 28.6 | | Conference Games | 3-8 | -5.2 | 4-7 | 1-0 | 62.1 | 27.5 | 44.6% | 31.9 | 63.0 | 28.4 | 44.8% | 29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.0 | 27.8 | 22-51 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 35.8% | 12-17 | 73.6% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 70.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.9 | 25.3 | 21-48 | 42.6% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 13-17 | 73.8% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.4 | 27.1 | 22-52 | 42.2% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 11-15 | 69.1% | 30 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 64.2 | 29.3 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 13-19 | 70.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 59.8 | 27.3 | 22-52 | 41.4% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 11-16 | 68.4% | 30 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-20 | -15.8 | 8-14 | 2-1 | 60.9 | 28.9 | 37.9% | 33.3 | 69.9 | 31.6 | 45.2% | 37.9 | | Home Games | 5-7 | -4.6 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 67.0 | 29.7 | 40.1% | 34.2 | 69.7 | 31.2 | 44.4% | 38.2 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 56.4 | 27.0 | 39.3% | 28.8 | 73.4 | 33.0 | 50.4% | 34.6 | | Conference Games | 1-10 | -7 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 57.7 | 29.4 | 38.2% | 32.2 | 69.3 | 30.9 | 46.2% | 36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 60.9 | 28.9 | 21-55 | 37.9% | 7-22 | 29.8% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.7 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-20 | 71.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.0 | 29.7 | 22-56 | 40.1% | 7-23 | 32.2% | 15-21 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 15 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 31.6 | 26-58 | 45.2% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 38 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.9 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 71.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.7 | 31.2 | 27-60 | 44.4% | 5-18 | 30.7% | 11-15 | 72.5% | 38 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOYOLA-IL 68.2, WI-MILWAUKEE 69.7 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| WI-MILWAUKEE is 19-13 against the spread versus LOYOLA-IL since 1997 | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 23-12 straight up against LOYOLA-IL since 1997 | | 12 of 20 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WI-MILWAUKEE is 4-1 against the spread versus LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 3-2 straight up against LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| LOYOLA-IL is 10-8 against the spread versus WI-MILWAUKEE since 1997 | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 12-7 straight up against LOYOLA-IL since 1997 | | 8 of 12 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WI-MILWAUKEE is 1-1 against the spread versus LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | WI-MILWAUKEE is 1-1 straight up against LOYOLA-IL over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/30/2013 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 65 | | ATS | 33 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 25 | 5 | 16 | | | LOYOLA-IL | 76 | -12 | SU | 32 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 2/25/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 78 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-44 | 59.1% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 24 | 5 | 10 | | | LOYOLA-IL | 69 | 118 | Over | 26 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 23 | 7 | 11 | 12/1/2011 | LOYOLA-IL | 41 | 121 | Under | 18 | 15-42 | 35.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 20 | 3 | 10 | | | WI-MILWAUKEE | 59 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 22 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 42 | 14 | 7 | 2/10/2011 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 66 | 137 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 36 | 9 | 15 | | | LOYOLA-IL | 57 | -3 | Under | 20 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 30 | 11 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-IL games 49.2% of the time since 1997. (150-155) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-IL games 54.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (36-30) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-MILWAUKEE games 49.4% of the time since 1997. (168-172) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WI-MILWAUKEE games 54.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (37-31) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 02/11/2013 - Ben Averkamp "?" Tuesday vs. Wisc Milwaukee ( Concussion ) | | [G] 02/01/2013 - Joe Crisman expected to miss 2-3 weeks ( Finger ) | |
| [G] 02/12/2013 - Mitch Roelke "?" Tuesday vs. Loyola Chicago ( Ankle ) | | [F] 02/11/2013 - Christian Wolf "?" Tuesday vs. Loyola Chicago ( Concussion ) | | [G] 01/19/2013 - Thierno Niang out indefinitely ( Back ) |
|
|