|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | VIRGINIA | -15 |  |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-5 | 40-29 | 220-186 | 4-1 | 31-28 | 140-133 | 9-9 | 39-44 | 286-209 | | in all lined games | 9-5 | 40-29 | 220-186 | 4-1 | 31-28 | 140-133 | 6-8 | 28-41 | 220-198 | | as an underdog | 7-3 | 31-18 | 121-88 | 4-1 | 20-24 | 65-71 | 3-7 | 15-34 | 66-150 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-0 | 4-2 | 16-14 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 11-11 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 8-23 | | in road games | 3-2 | 18-7 | 95-56 | 1-1 | 12-10 | 54-46 | 2-3 | 7-19 | 69-93 | | in road lined games | 3-2 | 18-7 | 95-56 | 1-1 | 12-10 | 54-46 | 2-3 | 7-18 | 66-91 | | against conference opponents | 4-1 | 27-13 | 149-118 | 1-1 | 18-19 | 85-96 | 1-4 | 15-25 | 132-143 | | in January games | 4-1 | 14-7 | 63-51 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 36-37 | 1-4 | 7-14 | 60-66 | | on Saturday games | 2-1 | 12-7 | 74-61 | 1-0 | 8-9 | 44-46 | 3-2 | 10-12 | 87-70 | | after a conference game | 4-1 | 25-13 | 140-114 | 0-1 | 16-18 | 86-89 | 2-3 | 17-23 | 136-138 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 3-0 | 14-9 | 71-56 | 0-1 | 10-11 | 42-38 | 1-2 | 9-14 | 59-77 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 2-0 | 15-7 | 45-29 | 1-1 | 11-11 | 30-24 | 1-2 | 9-16 | 44-48 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-1 | 8-3 | 28-20 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 12-14 | 1-0 | 7-5 | 20-34 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-1 | 32-22 | 176-142 | 3-1 | 24-26 | 111-120 | 4-5 | 21-34 | 171-174 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-0 | 18-12 | 106-82 | 0-1 | 13-16 | 67-83 | 0-2 | 9-21 | 83-111 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-0 | 13-3 | 41-26 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 28-29 | 0-2 | 8-8 | 31-38 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 3-2 | 20-11 | 74-50 | 0-1 | 12-15 | 51-45 | 4-3 | 19-15 | 82-58 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 2-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 8-0 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 2-2 | 5-4 | 10-10 | 1-0 | 3-3 | 9-5 | 4-2 | 11-3 | 35-4 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-5 | 41-26 | 185-208 | 1-2 | 17-36 | 132-147 | 13-5 | 51-30 | 258-218 | | in all lined games | 10-5 | 41-26 | 185-208 | 1-2 | 17-36 | 132-147 | 11-5 | 40-29 | 188-213 | | as a favorite | 9-3 | 23-15 | 86-94 | 1-1 | 10-18 | 59-53 | 10-3 | 30-10 | 132-52 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-0 | 2-3 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 10-5 | 2-0 | 5-1 | 14-8 | | in all home games | 8-1 | 22-11 | 98-91 | 0-1 | 6-18 | 66-62 | 11-1 | 35-10 | 187-69 | | in home lined games | 8-1 | 22-11 | 98-91 | 0-1 | 6-18 | 66-62 | 9-1 | 25-9 | 127-65 | | against conference opponents | 3-2 | 22-16 | 117-140 | 0-1 | 14-21 | 91-102 | 3-2 | 19-20 | 103-161 | | in January games | 3-2 | 12-8 | 62-60 | 0-1 | 6-10 | 44-35 | 3-2 | 12-9 | 61-66 | | on Saturday games | 3-2 | 15-6 | 54-55 | 1-0 | 6-11 | 33-41 | 4-2 | 12-11 | 56-65 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 2-1 | 6-3 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 14-20 | 2-1 | 9-4 | 45-25 | | after a conference game | 2-2 | 20-16 | 112-134 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 89-95 | 2-2 | 19-20 | 113-150 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-1 | 8-8 | 47-46 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 32-41 | 1-1 | 7-11 | 48-54 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 8-4 | 26-17 | 52-47 | 1-1 | 9-24 | 31-43 | 10-4 | 37-17 | 78-46 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-9 | -3.2 | 9-5 | 4-1 | 68.8 | 32.3 | 43.4% | 34.1 | 67.7 | 31.1 | 44.1% | 32.8 | | Road Games | 2-5 | -2.6 | 4-3 | 3-1 | 71.7 | 33.0 | 43.5% | 31.6 | 73.9 | 32.0 | 48.7% | 33.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 4-1 | 1-1 | 69.8 | 30.6 | 42.1% | 32.2 | 70.4 | 29.6 | 46.9% | 33.6 | | Conference Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 4-1 | 1-1 | 69.8 | 30.6 | 42.1% | 32.2 | 70.4 | 29.6 | 46.9% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.8 | 32.3 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 7-22 | 33.8% | 16-22 | 70.6% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.5 | 23-56 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.7 | 33.0 | 23-53 | 43.5% | 9-24 | 37.0% | 17-24 | 69.6% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 31.1 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 7-18 | 36.4% | 12-17 | 68.1% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.9 | 32.0 | 27-56 | 48.7% | 8-19 | 42.3% | 11-17 | 66.7% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-5 | +5.1 | 10-5 | 1-2 | 62.7 | 29.3 | 45.4% | 33.1 | 51.1 | 22.8 | 36.8% | 29.6 | | Home Games | 11-1 | +4.5 | 8-1 | 0-1 | 64.9 | 31.5 | 47.5% | 34.0 | 47.2 | 21.7 | 33.6% | 29.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 57.4 | 26.6 | 43.1% | 29.8 | 52.0 | 23.6 | 41.6% | 28.4 | | Conference Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 57.4 | 26.6 | 43.1% | 29.8 | 52.0 | 23.6 | 41.6% | 28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 62.7 | 29.3 | 23-51 | 45.4% | 6-15 | 39.7% | 11-15 | 70.2% | 33 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.7 | 31.3 | 23-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 64.9 | 31.5 | 24-51 | 47.5% | 5-13 | 40.7% | 11-16 | 70.3% | 34 | 7 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 51.1 | 22.8 | 18-48 | 36.8% | 5-17 | 29.0% | 11-16 | 67.4% | 30 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.4 | 30.7 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 67.4% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 47.2 | 21.7 | 17-50 | 33.6% | 4-17 | 23.9% | 10-14 | 68.9% | 30 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON COLLEGE 71.2, VIRGINIA 74.3 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| VIRGINIA is 6-5 against the spread versus BOSTON COLLEGE since 1997 | | BOSTON COLLEGE is 6-5 straight up against VIRGINIA since 1997 | | 6 of 11 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| BOSTON COLLEGE is 2-1 against the spread versus VIRGINIA over the last 3 seasons | | BOSTON COLLEGE is 2-1 straight up against VIRGINIA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| BOSTON COLLEGE is 3-2 against the spread versus VIRGINIA since 1997 | | VIRGINIA is 3-2 straight up against BOSTON COLLEGE since 1997 | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| BOSTON COLLEGE is 2-0 against the spread versus VIRGINIA over the last 3 seasons | | VIRGINIA is 1-1 straight up against BOSTON COLLEGE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 49 | 114.5 | ATS | 23 | 18-45 | 40.0% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 24 | 3 | 15 | | | VIRGINIA | 66 | -18 | SU Over | 31 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 30 | 4 | 8 | 2/26/2011 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 63 | 124.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 24-47 | 51.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 34 | 5 | 11 | | | VIRGINIA | 44 | -1 | Under | 28 | 17-53 | 32.1% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 28 | 10 | 7 | 1/19/2011 | VIRGINIA | 67 | 133 | ATS | 28 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 34 | 11 | 7 | | | BOSTON COLLEGE | 70 | -9 | SU Over | 34 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 34 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOSTON COLLEGE games 52.9% of the time since 1997. (166-148) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOSTON COLLEGE games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (25-25) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VIRGINIA games 51.8% of the time since 1997. (173-161) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VIRGINIA games 57.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (32-24) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 11/11/2012 - Jordan Daniels has left team ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 01/15/2013 - Darion Atkins out indefinitely ( Stress Fracture ) | | [G] 11/08/2012 - Malcolm Brogdon out for season ( Foot ) |
|
|
Free Android App
