|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-10 | 45-35 | 175-174 | 1-1 | 30-31 | 113-107 | 8-15 | 35-53 | 233-239 | | in all lined games | 11-10 | 45-35 | 175-174 | 1-1 | 30-31 | 113-107 | 8-13 | 32-49 | 176-178 | | as an underdog | 7-6 | 30-22 | 83-78 | 0-1 | 19-21 | 61-60 | 3-10 | 13-40 | 44-120 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 2-2 | 3-4 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 7-0 | 0-4 | 0-7 | 1-14 | | in road games | 7-5 | 27-14 | 84-81 | 1-0 | 18-13 | 61-48 | 3-10 | 16-29 | 85-140 | | in road lined games | 7-5 | 27-14 | 84-81 | 1-0 | 18-13 | 61-48 | 3-9 | 14-28 | 62-105 | | against conference opponents | 8-5 | 28-23 | 122-123 | 1-1 | 18-23 | 76-81 | 6-7 | 21-31 | 155-153 | | in February games | 1-2 | 9-9 | 42-53 | 1-0 | 11-6 | 36-28 | 2-1 | 8-11 | 59-63 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 5-1 | 16-14 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 10-6 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 23-20 | | after a conference game | 7-5 | 29-19 | 118-117 | 1-1 | 17-22 | 71-82 | 5-8 | 24-28 | 157-150 | | off a win against a conference rival | 3-1 | 13-6 | 67-59 | 1-0 | 6-10 | 32-41 | 1-4 | 10-10 | 72-59 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 6-2 | 17-8 | 47-40 | 1-0 | 8-10 | 25-23 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 57-59 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-2 | 20-11 | 79-76 | 0-1 | 11-12 | 53-47 | 3-7 | 8-26 | 72-127 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 4-1 | 10-5 | 43-41 | 0-1 | 4-8 | 32-31 | 2-3 | 5-11 | 40-67 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-1 | 4-3 | 7-8 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 5-10 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 2-3 | 9-8 | 25-22 | 0-1 | 4-9 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 6-12 | 21-31 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-2 | 6-8 | 14-19 | 1-0 | 6-6 | 11-15 | 2-1 | 7-7 | 25-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 3-4 | 12-14 | 29-34 | 1-0 | 10-10 | 23-23 | 4-3 | 14-14 | 53-33 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-11 | 39-40 | 173-175 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 15-10 | 62-33 | 253-229 | | in all lined games | 10-11 | 39-40 | 173-175 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 14-10 | 51-33 | 184-178 | | as a favorite | 7-6 | 29-29 | 91-89 | 0-0 | 18-29 | 57-60 | 11-3 | 44-17 | 134-55 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-1 | 3-4 | 7-15 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 13-9 | | in all home games | 5-3 | 18-15 | 68-78 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 5-3 | 31-10 | 126-79 | | in home lined games | 5-3 | 18-15 | 68-78 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 5-3 | 24-10 | 88-61 | | against conference opponents | 6-7 | 28-25 | 129-113 | 2-0 | 18-26 | 81-78 | 7-6 | 38-17 | 174-136 | | in February games | 3-0 | 12-7 | 55-39 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 28-35 | 3-0 | 15-5 | 73-53 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-1 | 1-2 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 9-10 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 28-27 | | after a conference game | 6-6 | 27-24 | 120-114 | 2-0 | 20-22 | 81-74 | 7-5 | 37-17 | 166-143 | | off a win against a conference rival | 4-2 | 20-14 | 74-61 | 0-0 | 16-13 | 46-46 | 5-1 | 27-10 | 85-61 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 7-5 | 27-18 | 65-57 | 0-0 | 19-14 | 43-34 | 10-3 | 38-16 | 87-62 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 5-5 | 17-16 | 81-66 | 0-0 | 6-17 | 39-48 | 8-4 | 32-9 | 144-63 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 3-1 | 10-9 | 47-33 | 0-0 | 5-10 | 22-29 | 4-0 | 17-2 | 71-30 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-2 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 1-0 | 5-3 | 7-6 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 8-6 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 1-3 | 7-9 | 17-22 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 16-15 | 1-3 | 9-10 | 24-30 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 4-1 | 9-7 | 23-11 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 12-13 | 5-0 | 15-2 | 36-5 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 5-2 | 11-10 | 29-30 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 21-20 | 7-0 | 21-4 | 65-16 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-15 | -4 | 11-10 | 1-1 | 58.3 | 27.0 | 40.8% | 32.2 | 62.2 | 29.1 | 41.5% | 32.5 | | Road Games | 3-12 | -5.8 | 7-7 | 1-0 | 57.7 | 26.4 | 40.3% | 30.6 | 66.3 | 31.2 | 44.5% | 31.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 58.0 | 26.8 | 41.7% | 33.4 | 54.2 | 24.8 | 37.0% | 29.8 | | Conference Games | 6-7 | -1 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 61.0 | 29.0 | 42.8% | 33.3 | 59.2 | 28.1 | 39.4% | 30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 58.3 | 27.0 | 19-47 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 14-22 | 64.2% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 22 | 7 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 31.3 | 24-55 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 57.7 | 26.4 | 19-47 | 40.3% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 14-22 | 65.7% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 7 | 18 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.2 | 29.1 | 20-48 | 41.5% | 6-16 | 35.4% | 17-25 | 68.7% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.3 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.3 | 31.2 | 21-47 | 44.5% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 31 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 15-10 | +3.9 | 10-11 | 2-0 | 63.6 | 31.0 | 44.1% | 33.0 | 60.2 | 29.4 | 40.6% | 32.5 | | Home Games | 5-3 | -2.7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 63.9 | 31.5 | 46.0% | 32.7 | 55.4 | 27.7 | 38.8% | 30.4 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 65.2 | 32.2 | 45.7% | 33.8 | 49.6 | 23.8 | 37.3% | 28.2 | | Conference Games | 7-6 | -2.6 | 6-7 | 2-0 | 64.2 | 31.8 | 44.3% | 34.9 | 58.6 | 28.8 | 39.3% | 31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.6 | 31.0 | 24-53 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 11-16 | 68.3% | 33 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.3 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 63.9 | 31.5 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 6-17 | 35.8% | 12-17 | 68.8% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.2 | 29.4 | 20-50 | 40.6% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 15-22 | 70.4% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.4 | 27.7 | 18-47 | 38.8% | 4-11 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.6% | 30 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MANHATTAN 67.8, FAIRFIELD 68.8 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| MANHATTAN is 16-13 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD since 1997 | | FAIRFIELD is 18-18 straight up against MANHATTAN since 1997 | | 13 of 19 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MANHATTAN is 3-2 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD over the last 3 seasons | | FAIRFIELD is 4-1 straight up against MANHATTAN over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| MANHATTAN is 7-6 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD since 1997 | | FAIRFIELD is 9-7 straight up against MANHATTAN since 1997 | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| FAIRFIELD is 2-1 against the spread versus MANHATTAN over the last 3 seasons | | FAIRFIELD is 3-0 straight up against MANHATTAN over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/18/2012 | MANHATTAN | 57 | 130 | Under | 37 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 35 | 14 | 20 | | | FAIRFIELD | 69 | -5 | SU ATS | 38 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 32 | 12 | 10 | 2/9/2012 | MANHATTAN | 54 | 127.5 | Under | 18 | 16-44 | 36.4% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 33 | 10 | 16 | | | FAIRFIELD | 60 | -5 | SU ATS | 26 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 12 | 1/8/2012 | FAIRFIELD | 51 | -1 | Under | 27 | 16-50 | 32.0% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 33 | 8 | 13 | | | MANHATTAN | 53 | 130 | SU ATS | 27 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 34 | 5 | 18 | 2/11/2011 | FAIRFIELD | 65 | -11 | SU Under | 36 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 38 | 13 | 10 | | | MANHATTAN | 56 | 121.5 | ATS | 27 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 1/28/2011 | MANHATTAN | 59 | 118 | ATS | 28 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 33 | 11 | 12 | | | FAIRFIELD | 61 | -19.5 | SU Over | 25 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 29 | 6 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MANHATTAN games 48.4% of the time since 1997. (137-146) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MANHATTAN games 59.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-27) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 49.5% of the time since 1997. (137-140) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 52.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (35-32) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G/F] 12/08/2012 - George Beamon out for season ( Ankle ) | |
| [F/C] 11/23/2012 - Vincent Van Nes out for season ( Toe ) |
|
|