|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| FORDHAM | | | | VA COMMONWEALTH | -25 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-8 | 27-36 | 167-210 | 0-0 | 22-20 | 96-103 | 6-15 | 23-55 | 147-303 | | in all lined games | 11-8 | 27-36 | 167-210 | 0-0 | 22-20 | 96-103 | 5-14 | 14-50 | 111-276 | | as an underdog | 10-7 | 25-33 | 127-164 | 0-0 | 21-19 | 75-76 | 3-14 | 10-49 | 51-250 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 4-4 | 9-12 | 40-47 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 24-17 | 0-8 | 0-21 | 1-88 | | as a road underdog of 24.5 to 30 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-9 | | in road games | 4-5 | 12-20 | 76-101 | 0-0 | 11-11 | 44-51 | 0-10 | 2-33 | 37-168 | | in road lined games | 4-5 | 12-20 | 76-101 | 0-0 | 11-11 | 44-51 | 0-9 | 1-31 | 31-153 | | against conference opponents | 5-1 | 15-22 | 115-138 | 0-0 | 17-15 | 70-73 | 2-4 | 6-32 | 70-191 | | in February games | 0-0 | 6-9 | 46-58 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 33-27 | 0-0 | 1-14 | 27-82 | | on Saturday games | 4-1 | 13-10 | 60-71 | 0-0 | 8-11 | 30-38 | 2-3 | 8-19 | 49-103 | | after a conference game | 4-2 | 13-24 | 108-140 | 0-0 | 16-15 | 68-69 | 1-5 | 5-33 | 71-189 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-1 | 11-18 | 73-95 | 0-0 | 15-12 | 45-46 | 1-2 | 5-25 | 42-134 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 5-4 | 16-22 | 95-118 | 0-0 | 18-11 | 62-62 | 0-10 | 7-37 | 49-191 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-1 | 9-14 | 50-62 | 0-0 | 14-6 | 39-38 | 0-3 | 2-21 | 21-95 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 3-5 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 6-1 | 12-19 | 0-1 | 0-8 | 9-40 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-3 | 10-11 | 44-54 | 0-0 | 10-3 | 24-28 | 2-5 | 7-15 | 28-83 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 0-1 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 7-25 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 0-1 | 1-2 | 24-22 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 13-11 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 13-47 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 6-9 | 43-44 | 229-214 | 4-6 | 38-43 | 136-129 | 17-5 | 74-24 | 331-173 | | in all lined games | 6-9 | 43-44 | 229-214 | 4-6 | 38-43 | 136-129 | 10-5 | 65-24 | 288-165 | | as a favorite | 5-8 | 26-36 | 142-140 | 3-5 | 27-29 | 96-93 | 9-4 | 51-13 | 236-55 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 1-0 | 3-8 | 24-28 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 23-23 | 1-0 | 12-0 | 54-1 | | as a home favorite of 24.5 to 30 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | | in all home games | 4-3 | 15-17 | 91-90 | 1-4 | 11-18 | 53-55 | 10-2 | 34-6 | 184-37 | | in home lined games | 4-3 | 15-17 | 91-90 | 1-4 | 11-18 | 53-55 | 5-2 | 27-6 | 152-36 | | against conference opponents | 2-5 | 20-27 | 147-147 | 2-1 | 21-24 | 87-83 | 5-2 | 37-12 | 200-102 | | in February games | 0-0 | 6-9 | 60-55 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 37-28 | 0-0 | 10-6 | 74-47 | | on Saturday games | 3-3 | 13-14 | 95-81 | 0-3 | 10-14 | 55-46 | 7-2 | 23-7 | 131-64 | | after a conference game | 1-5 | 22-23 | 152-136 | 2-1 | 19-25 | 86-81 | 4-2 | 38-10 | 202-99 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-3 | 17-16 | 96-93 | 2-0 | 18-15 | 65-60 | 3-1 | 30-6 | 135-63 | | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 0-0 | 4-1 | 26-8 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 27-11 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-2 | 10-14 | 85-85 | 1-0 | 14-8 | 48-44 | 6-0 | 26-1 | 154-41 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 1-1 | 5-10 | 52-48 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 33-24 | 2-0 | 14-1 | 85-17 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 6-15 | +1.2 | 11-8 | 0-0 | 65.5 | 30.2 | 40.6% | 38.4 | 75.1 | 36.9 | 44.5% | 35.0 | | Road Games | 2-12 | +1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 62.2 | 28.7 | 39.1% | 37.0 | 77.6 | 38.8 | 45.9% | 35.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 64.0 | 27.4 | 37.0% | 41.2 | 75.2 | 36.6 | 45.0% | 36.6 | | Conference Games | 2-4 | -0.8 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 67.0 | 30.7 | 39.9% | 42.5 | 75.2 | 37.3 | 43.6% | 36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.5 | 30.2 | 24-58 | 40.6% | 5-17 | 31.7% | 13-19 | 66.2% | 38 | 12 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.2 | 28.7 | 22-57 | 39.1% | 5-18 | 30.9% | 12-17 | 67.3% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 36.9 | 25-57 | 44.5% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 18-25 | 70.3% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.6 | 38.8 | 26-58 | 45.9% | 6-18 | 35.9% | 18-25 | 72.1% | 36 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-5 | -12 | 6-9 | 4-6 | 77.8 | 37.5 | 45.3% | 36.6 | 62.9 | 27.0 | 43.4% | 33.6 | | Home Games | 10-2 | -8.5 | 4-3 | 1-4 | 76.8 | 37.5 | 44.2% | 36.3 | 60.3 | 26.2 | 43.3% | 34.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -10.5 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 77.4 | 33.0 | 45.1% | 38.0 | 73.6 | 28.8 | 47.1% | 34.0 | | Conference Games | 5-2 | -8.5 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 76.1 | 33.3 | 45.5% | 36.0 | 70.7 | 29.3 | 45.8% | 33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 37.5 | 28-63 | 45.3% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 13-20 | 66.7% | 37 | 14 | 15 | 19 | 12 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-18 | 69.0% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.8 | 37.5 | 29-65 | 44.2% | 7-24 | 29.9% | 12-18 | 67.5% | 36 | 14 | 17 | 18 | 15 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.9 | 27.0 | 22-51 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 13-18 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 20 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.2 | 25-55 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.3 | 26.2 | 21-49 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 31.3% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 23 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: FORDHAM 73.2, VA COMMONWEALTH 74.2 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FORDHAM games 54.8% of the time since 1997. (170-140) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FORDHAM games 62.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (32-19) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VA COMMONWEALTH games 50.3% of the time since 1997. (177-175) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VA COMMONWEALTH games 48% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (36-39) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 01/29/2013 - Chris Gaston out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 12/13/2012 - Devon McMillan expected to transfer ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 11/02/2012 - Mo Alie-Cox out for season ( Eligibility ) | | [G] 11/02/2012 - Jordan Burgess out for season ( Eligibility ) |
|
|