|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| CS-NORTHRIDGE | | | | UC-RIVERSIDE | -1 |  |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-9 | 36-35 | 165-165 | 0-0 | 26-22 | 102-102 | 11-11 | 32-50 | 234-237 | | in all lined games | 11-9 | 36-35 | 165-165 | 0-0 | 26-22 | 102-102 | 9-11 | 25-46 | 141-194 | | as a favorite | 4-3 | 8-9 | 64-69 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 44-40 | 4-3 | 9-8 | 86-50 | | as a road favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-0 | | in road games | 6-5 | 20-19 | 84-83 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 44-56 | 4-7 | 12-30 | 79-150 | | in road lined games | 6-5 | 20-19 | 84-83 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 44-56 | 4-7 | 11-28 | 52-117 | | against conference opponents | 3-7 | 21-23 | 112-109 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 63-78 | 2-8 | 15-29 | 141-137 | | in February games | 0-0 | 8-8 | 42-42 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 28-28 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 53-56 | | on Saturday games | 3-5 | 15-12 | 76-56 | 0-0 | 11-8 | 44-36 | 1-7 | 12-20 | 88-89 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 3-3 | 12-8 | 60-41 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 30-31 | 3-3 | 11-10 | 82-60 | | after a conference game | 3-7 | 21-20 | 105-98 | 0-0 | 15-14 | 62-62 | 3-7 | 16-28 | 142-135 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 2-1 | 9-4 | 34-19 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 12-21 | 2-1 | 4-10 | 29-32 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-1 | 6-7 | 50-46 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 30-35 | 0-1 | 4-10 | 50-57 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 0-2 | 5-9 | 35-41 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 21-24 | 2-2 | 5-14 | 58-64 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 4-2 | 9-7 | 41-44 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 21-30 | 4-2 | 6-11 | 69-69 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-0 | 4-3 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 58-35 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-5 | 14-15 | 68-67 | 0-0 | 11-10 | 43-46 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 120-74 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 1-3 | 8-8 | 40-36 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 26-26 | 1-3 | 7-10 | 66-37 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 1-4 | 18-11 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 31-7 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-1 | 5-6 | 31-21 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 17-20 | 2-1 | 6-6 | 53-18 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-12 | 35-39 | 144-153 | 0-0 | 22-30 | 84-118 | 5-16 | 31-52 | 115-222 | | in all lined games | 7-12 | 35-39 | 144-153 | 0-0 | 22-30 | 84-118 | 3-16 | 23-51 | 87-212 | | as an underdog | 7-12 | 31-30 | 116-114 | 0-0 | 15-24 | 61-91 | 3-16 | 15-46 | 46-186 | | as a home underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-1 | 1-4 | 6-17 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 5-18 | | in all home games | 2-5 | 12-15 | 53-67 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 39-43 | 4-5 | 19-15 | 76-71 | | in home lined games | 2-5 | 12-15 | 53-67 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 39-43 | 2-5 | 12-15 | 55-66 | | against conference opponents | 4-5 | 23-21 | 97-100 | 0-0 | 15-19 | 59-76 | 2-7 | 16-28 | 60-139 | | in February games | 0-0 | 9-7 | 45-33 | 0-0 | 3-13 | 23-34 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 32-47 | | on Saturday games | 3-6 | 12-15 | 62-64 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 42-40 | 3-7 | 12-16 | 60-80 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 3-3 | 13-11 | 41-50 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 30-30 | 1-5 | 8-16 | 29-70 | | after a conference game | 4-5 | 21-21 | 89-98 | 0-0 | 14-17 | 54-70 | 2-7 | 17-27 | 62-136 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 3-3 | 11-14 | 59-59 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 34-45 | 2-4 | 10-15 | 43-84 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 2-0 | 7-5 | 35-32 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 22-25 | 3-0 | 8-5 | 31-48 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 1-2 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 6-6 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 2-11 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 3-1 | 5-5 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 10-14 | 2-2 | 3-7 | 5-26 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-11 | -8.2 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 77.2 | 35.6 | 44.3% | 38.1 | 75.5 | 36.2 | 46.8% | 34.4 | | Road Games | 7-7 | +6 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 73.3 | 34.1 | 42.7% | 36.6 | 75.5 | 35.9 | 47.8% | 34.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 72.8 | 34.0 | 43.8% | 37.6 | 75.6 | 33.8 | 48.0% | 32.6 | | Conference Games | 2-8 | -16.6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 72.3 | 34.7 | 41.9% | 36.4 | 77.9 | 37.0 | 51.7% | 33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 35.6 | 28-62 | 44.3% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 17-24 | 71.6% | 38 | 13 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 71.6 | 33.7 | 25-58 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 14-20 | 70.4% | 36 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.3 | 34.1 | 26-61 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 31.9% | 16-23 | 70.0% | 37 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 36.2 | 26-57 | 46.8% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 34 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 43.5% | 7-20 | 34.5% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 35.9 | 27-56 | 47.8% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 15-22 | 69.3% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-16 | -1.6 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 61.2 | 28.9 | 42.8% | 36.3 | 67.8 | 31.5 | 42.8% | 31.5 | | Home Games | 4-5 | -1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 66.4 | 33.6 | 43.5% | 40.6 | 64.4 | 25.4 | 38.6% | 33.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 69.6 | 31.2 | 49.2% | 33.2 | 72.6 | 31.2 | 46.0% | 28.6 | | Conference Games | 2-7 | +4.2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 65.7 | 29.3 | 48.6% | 32.0 | 70.2 | 31.7 | 44.5% | 28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 61.2 | 28.9 | 23-54 | 42.8% | 5-17 | 29.5% | 10-17 | 57.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 71.1 | 34.3 | 25-58 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.4 | 33.6 | 25-57 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 11-19 | 56.3% | 41 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.8 | 31.5 | 23-55 | 42.8% | 8-22 | 37.7% | 13-18 | 72.5% | 31 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.9 | 32.6 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.4 | 25.4 | 22-58 | 38.6% | 8-24 | 32.9% | 12-18 | 67.7% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CS-NORTHRIDGE 67, UC-RIVERSIDE 64 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CS-NORTHRIDGE is 13-10 against the spread versus UC-RIVERSIDE since 1997 | | CS-NORTHRIDGE is 16-7 straight up against UC-RIVERSIDE since 1997 | | 12 of 16 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UC-RIVERSIDE is 4-1 against the spread versus CS-NORTHRIDGE over the last 3 seasons | | UC-RIVERSIDE is 4-1 straight up against CS-NORTHRIDGE over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CS-NORTHRIDGE is 7-4 against the spread versus UC-RIVERSIDE since 1997 | | CS-NORTHRIDGE is 8-3 straight up against UC-RIVERSIDE since 1997 | | 7 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UC-RIVERSIDE is 1-1 against the spread versus CS-NORTHRIDGE over the last 3 seasons | | UC-RIVERSIDE is 1-1 straight up against CS-NORTHRIDGE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/2013 | UC-RIVERSIDE | 65 | | SU ATS | 30 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 0-9 | 0.0% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 33 | 7 | 16 | | | CS-NORTHRIDGE | 64 | -13 | | 32 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 28 | 10 | 12 | 2/22/2012 | UC-RIVERSIDE | 63 | 131.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 38 | 9 | 19 | | | CS-NORTHRIDGE | 61 | -1.5 | Under | 31 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 37 | 14 | 9 | 1/2/2012 | CS-NORTHRIDGE | 63 | 131 | SU ATS | 42 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 37 | 10 | 11 | | | UC-RIVERSIDE | 52 | -6 | Under | 30 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 31 | 9 | 13 | 2/3/2011 | CS-NORTHRIDGE | 70 | 139 | Over | 37 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 30 | 8 | 16 | | | UC-RIVERSIDE | 73 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 25 | 10 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CS-NORTHRIDGE games 47.6% of the time since 1997. (131-144) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CS-NORTHRIDGE games 50.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-29) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UC-RIVERSIDE games 51% of the time since 1997. (122-117) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UC-RIVERSIDE games 53.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (34-30) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 02/01/2013 - Stephan Hicks "?" Saturday vs. Cal Riverside ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|