|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 24-14 | 121-98 | 216-171 | 19-19 | 118-105 | 205-186 | 32-8 | 156-69 | 231-164 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 3-1 | 14-15 | 25-28 | 3-0 | 16-12 | 28-24 | 4-0 | 23-6 | 33-20 | | as a favorite | 24-13 | 95-77 | 127-105 | 19-17 | 97-76 | 129-104 | 32-6 | 134-41 | 177-59 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less | 1-2 | 17-11 | 22-13 | 1-2 | 15-13 | 18-17 | 1-2 | 17-11 | 22-13 | | in road games | 10-6 | 60-46 | 111-80 | 7-10 | 51-58 | 102-91 | 13-5 | 66-44 | 97-98 | | in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 2-0 | 9-5 | 15-11 | 1-0 | 4-9 | 11-14 | 2-0 | 10-4 | 13-13 | | in January games | 6-3 | 20-17 | 38-28 | 4-5 | 18-19 | 32-33 | 8-2 | 26-12 | 41-26 | | on Sunday games | 4-1 | 16-17 | 25-34 | 2-3 | 16-17 | 30-30 | 5-1 | 20-14 | 31-30 | | vs. division opponents | 4-1 | 21-15 | 37-31 | 1-5 | 17-23 | 33-39 | 5-1 | 32-8 | 45-27 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 7-2 | 35-29 | 61-61 | 7-2 | 39-25 | 69-52 | 8-1 | 43-21 | 61-61 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 15-6 | 52-49 | 74-73 | 10-10 | 53-48 | 80-66 | 19-3 | 67-36 | 87-62 | | after 3 or more consecutive wins | 9-9 | 36-27 | 44-37 | 9-9 | 36-29 | 49-34 | 14-4 | 45-20 | 56-27 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 13-4 | 68-55 | 124-94 | 8-10 | 63-65 | 112-111 | 14-4 | 77-51 | 107-117 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 10-6 | 42-37 | 91-78 | 9-7 | 41-40 | 91-80 | 16-1 | 65-17 | 114-59 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-0 | 17-16 | 44-42 | 0-0 | 14-21 | 45-44 | 0-0 | 30-5 | 62-27 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 6-5 | 45-45 | 99-88 | 8-2 | 52-40 | 101-86 | 9-2 | 57-36 | 96-94 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-0 | 27-24 | 54-52 | 0-0 | 26-27 | 57-50 | 0-0 | 32-21 | 56-52 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 23-19 | 110-89 | 672-654 | 23-19 | 94-101 | 663-657 | 24-18 | 116-86 | 633-720 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 4-0 | 31-19 | 124-119 | 2-2 | 27-22 | 123-118 | 4-0 | 38-14 | 153-95 | | as an underdog | 7-7 | 47-31 | 367-371 | 10-4 | 40-34 | 360-378 | 4-10 | 29-49 | 213-545 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less | 1-0 | 3-2 | 40-34 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 37-35 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 34-42 | | in home games | 11-7 | 48-46 | 341-316 | 8-10 | 41-52 | 330-320 | 15-3 | 71-26 | 409-261 | | in a home game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 2-0 | 14-14 | 69-65 | 1-1 | 16-12 | 68-64 | 2-0 | 25-5 | 102-35 | | in January games | 4-6 | 24-19 | 117-112 | 6-4 | 26-18 | 104-129 | 7-3 | 29-15 | 121-119 | | on Sunday games | 4-1 | 13-14 | 80-70 | 4-1 | 14-13 | 71-81 | 4-1 | 13-15 | 73-84 | | vs. division opponents | 5-4 | 22-20 | 155-171 | 5-4 | 20-22 | 170-158 | 4-5 | 20-23 | 145-194 | | after a non-conference game | 7-6 | 35-25 | 220-225 | 8-5 | 34-25 | 238-203 | 6-7 | 36-25 | 201-256 | | after 3 or more consecutive overs | 1-3 | 10-11 | 87-72 | 3-1 | 12-9 | 82-79 | 2-2 | 10-11 | 84-80 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 9-8 | 44-41 | 344-337 | 8-9 | 39-46 | 315-367 | 13-4 | 51-36 | 299-410 | | off a upset loss as a favorite | 3-4 | 19-16 | 82-82 | 3-4 | 19-16 | 89-75 | 2-5 | 23-13 | 85-82 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 7-11 | 39-39 | 242-230 | 10-8 | 34-41 | 232-239 | 11-7 | 42-36 | 238-245 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 7-10 | 40-52 | 240-236 | 10-7 | 39-48 | 239-232 | 10-7 | 51-41 | 262-222 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 9-9 | 58-48 | 358-337 | 10-8 | 45-59 | 335-361 | 10-8 | 53-54 | 278-439 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 8-5 | 39-28 | 197-191 | 8-5 | 33-34 | 193-199 | 8-5 | 39-31 | 179-223 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 32-8 | +5.6 | 24-14 | 19-19 | 105.7 | 52.9 | 47.7% | 50.6 | 96.4 | 46.5 | 42.8% | 48.0 | | Road Games | 13-5 | -0.2 | 10-6 | 7-10 | 103.1 | 52.2 | 46.0% | 50.9 | 96.6 | 47.2 | 42.5% | 49.8 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 107.8 | 55.4 | 47.2% | 52.8 | 97.0 | 45.8 | 41.4% | 53.6 | | Division Games | 5-1 | +3.8 | 4-1 | 1-5 | 102.5 | 50.5 | 48.0% | 50.5 | 91.5 | 44.8 | 40.7% | 49.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 105.7 | 52.9 | 38-79 | 47.7% | 8-19 | 38.9% | 23-27 | 83.8% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 103.1 | 52.2 | 37-80 | 46.0% | 7-21 | 33.2% | 23-27 | 85.0% | 51 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.4 | 46.5 | 36-84 | 42.8% | 7-21 | 34.8% | 17-22 | 78.0% | 48 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.2 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 17-22 | 74.9% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 96.6 | 47.2 | 36-85 | 42.5% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 16-21 | 77.3% | 50 | 12 | 23 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-18 | -5.8 | 23-19 | 23-19 | 102.7 | 51.1 | 46.5% | 55.5 | 100.4 | 51.2 | 43.9% | 52.3 | | Home Games | 15-3 | +2.3 | 11-7 | 8-10 | 106.3 | 51.5 | 46.9% | 56.1 | 97.8 | 48.4 | 43.8% | 51.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -4 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 106.8 | 49.6 | 46.7% | 51.4 | 107.2 | 55.8 | 49.2% | 50.4 | | Division Games | 4-5 | -5.5 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 102.8 | 49.4 | 46.6% | 55.2 | 101.3 | 51.9 | 42.2% | 54.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 102.7 | 51.1 | 39-85 | 46.5% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 18-26 | 68.1% | 56 | 14 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.5 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 106.3 | 51.5 | 40-86 | 46.9% | 6-19 | 34.7% | 19-28 | 68.3% | 56 | 14 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 100.4 | 51.2 | 38-86 | 43.9% | 8-23 | 36.2% | 17-23 | 73.6% | 52 | 13 | 23 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 7 | | vs opponents averaging | 98 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 97.8 | 48.4 | 37-84 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.9% | 16-21 | 73.1% | 52 | 11 | 23 | 23 | 7 | 15 | 8 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA CITY 95.2, DENVER 95.2 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/12/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 92-88 | W | -14.5 | L | 196 | U | 31-71 | 43.7% | 52 | 10 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 48 | 10 | | 12/14/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 113-103 | W | -13 | L | 203 | O | 41-83 | 49.4% | 52 | 18 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | | 12/17/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 107-93 | W | -5.5 | W | 208.5 | U | 38-85 | 44.7% | 51 | 12 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 48 | 16 | | 12/19/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 100-92 | W | -5.5 | W | 200 | U | 36-84 | 42.9% | 57 | 15 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 56 | 11 | | 12/20/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 93-99 | L | -2 | L | 200.5 | U | 33-82 | 40.2% | 51 | 16 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 56 | 15 | | 12/25/2012 | @ MIAMI | 97-103 | L | 2.5 | L | 204 | U | 30-71 | 42.3% | 50 | 16 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 39 | 13 | | 12/27/2012 | DALLAS | 111-105 | W | -10.5 | L | 207 | O | 39-93 | 41.9% | 61 | 12 | 40-95 | 42.1% | 55 | 13 | | 12/29/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 124-94 | W | -4.5 | W | 212.5 | O | 45-94 | 47.9% | 63 | 21 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 45 | 24 | | 12/31/2012 | PHOENIX | 114-96 | W | -12.5 | W | 206.5 | O | 44-87 | 50.6% | 44 | 5 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 46 | 13 | | 1/2/2013 | BROOKLYN | 93-110 | L | -10 | L | 197.5 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 41 | 19 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 42 | 12 | | 1/4/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 109-85 | W | -11 | W | 196.5 | U | 39-75 | 52.0% | 52 | 18 | 34-84 | 40.5% | 42 | 20 | | 1/6/2013 | @ TORONTO | 104-92 | W | -6.5 | W | 196.5 | U | 38-77 | 49.4% | 46 | 16 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 42 | 16 | | 1/7/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 99-101 | L | -12 | L | 194 | O | 34-80 | 42.5% | 50 | 11 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 53 | 14 | | 1/9/2013 | MINNESOTA | 106-84 | W | -13 | W | 202 | U | 36-76 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 43 | 19 | | 1/11/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 116-101 | W | -6.5 | W | 217 | P | 44-87 | 50.6% | 61 | 17 | 39-98 | 39.8% | 55 | 12 | | 1/13/2013 | @ PORTLAND | 87-83 | W | -4 | T | 202 | U | 32-71 | 45.1% | 50 | 15 | 31-86 | 36.0% | 52 | 12 | | 1/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 102-90 | W | -5.5 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-84 | 47.6% | 50 | 10 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 55 | 14 | | 1/16/2013 | DENVER | 117-97 | W | -9 | W | 209 | O | 44-85 | 51.8% | 46 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 19 | | 1/18/2013 | @ DALLAS | 117-114 | W | -5.5 | L | 205.5 | O | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 17 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 57 | 16 | | 1/20/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/11/2012 | @ DETROIT | 101-94 | W | -4.5 | W | 203.5 | U | 37-80 | 46.2% | 50 | 9 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 63 | 16 | | 12/12/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 105-108 | L | 4 | W | 199.5 | O | 42-83 | 50.6% | 53 | 19 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 54 | 13 | | 12/14/2012 | MEMPHIS | 99-94 | W | -1.5 | W | 194.5 | U | 36-69 | 52.2% | 43 | 19 | 39-94 | 41.5% | 49 | 16 | | 12/16/2012 | @ SACRAMENTO | 122-97 | W | -4.5 | W | 204.5 | O | 46-85 | 54.1% | 61 | 11 | 31-91 | 34.1% | 50 | 9 | | 12/18/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 112-106 | W | -2.5 | W | 209 | O | 38-87 | 43.7% | 71 | 15 | 38-95 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | | 12/20/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 93-101 | L | -6 | L | 201 | U | 38-98 | 38.8% | 72 | 9 | 33-92 | 35.9% | 59 | 11 | | 12/22/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 110-88 | W | -16 | W | 210 | U | 47-92 | 51.1% | 55 | 12 | 33-87 | 37.9% | 60 | 11 | | 12/25/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 100-112 | L | 6 | L | 204 | O | 40-80 | 50.0% | 48 | 18 | 45-93 | 48.4% | 55 | 15 | | 12/26/2012 | LA LAKERS | 126-114 | W | -3.5 | W | 212.5 | O | 45-94 | 47.9% | 56 | 10 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 52 | 14 | | 12/28/2012 | @ DALLAS | 106-85 | W | -3 | W | 210 | U | 43-94 | 45.7% | 67 | 17 | 33-88 | 37.5% | 52 | 14 | | 12/29/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 72-81 | L | 6.5 | L | 196 | U | 29-68 | 42.6% | 45 | 16 | 36-89 | 40.4% | 57 | 8 | | 1/1/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 92-78 | W | 0 | W | 207.5 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 60 | 15 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 59 | 13 | | 1/3/2013 | MINNESOTA | 97-101 | L | -8.5 | L | 201 | U | 40-86 | 46.5% | 46 | 7 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 64 | 13 | | 1/5/2013 | UTAH | 110-91 | W | -10 | W | 202 | U | 39-76 | 51.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 51 | 19 | | 1/6/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 112-105 | W | 5.5 | W | 214 | O | 44-101 | 43.6% | 57 | 8 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 60 | 18 | | 1/9/2013 | ORLANDO | 108-105 | W | -11.5 | L | 204 | O | 41-94 | 43.6% | 68 | 10 | 44-93 | 47.3% | 49 | 11 | | 1/11/2013 | CLEVELAND | 98-91 | W | -12.5 | L | 206.5 | U | 36-82 | 43.9% | 63 | 22 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 44 | 15 | | 1/13/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 116-105 | W | -6.5 | W | 209 | O | 43-90 | 47.8% | 51 | 8 | 43-83 | 51.8% | 44 | 18 | | 1/15/2013 | PORTLAND | 115-111 | W | -9 | L | 202 | O | 47-99 | 47.5% | 48 | 10 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 61 | 18 | | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 97-117 | L | 9 | L | 209 | O | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 19 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 46 | 14 | | 1/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 108-112 | L | -10.5 | L | 203 | O | 41-84 | 48.8% | 46 | 14 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 57 | 20 | | 1/20/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| DENVER is 35-32 against the spread versus OKLAHOMA CITY since 1996 | | OKLAHOMA CITY is 38-31 straight up against DENVER since 1996 | | 39 of 69 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| OKLAHOMA CITY is 7-5 against the spread versus DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | OKLAHOMA CITY is 10-3 straight up against DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | 9 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| DENVER is 18-14 against the spread versus OKLAHOMA CITY since 1996 | | DENVER is 19-14 straight up against OKLAHOMA CITY since 1996 | | 17 of 33 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| OKLAHOMA CITY is 3-1 against the spread versus DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | OKLAHOMA CITY is 3-2 straight up against DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/16/2013 | DENVER | 97 | 209 | Over | 47 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 29-37 | 78.4% | 49 | 11 | 19 | | | OKLAHOMA CITY | 117 | -9 | SU ATS | 67 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 46 | 15 | 14 | 04/25/2012 | DENVER | 106 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 64 | 40-90 | 44.4% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 18-30 | 60.0% | 58 | 17 | 10 | | | OKLAHOMA CITY | 101 | 211 | Under | 58 | 39-79 | 49.4% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 46 | 11 | 18 | 03/15/2012 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 103 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 46 | 8 | 13 | | | DENVER | 90 | 214 | Under | 51 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 17-25 | 68.0% | 54 | 10 | 16 | 02/19/2012 | DENVER | 118 | 210.5 | ATS | 58 | 49-101 | 48.5% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 58 | 18 | 15 | | | OKLAHOMA CITY | 124 | -8 | SU Over | 53 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 9-28 | 32.1% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 51 | 17 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in OKLAHOMA CITY games 50.6% of the time since 1996. (530-518) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in OKLAHOMA CITY games 56.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (91-70) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (539-519) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 58.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (89-64) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in OKLAHOMA CITY games 50.7% of the time since 1996. (619-601) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in OKLAHOMA CITY games 53.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (112-97) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 49% of the time since 1996. (564-587) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 48.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (85-91) | |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|