|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| HOUSTON | -18 |  | | SACRAMENTO | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 28-23 | 103-93 | 678-654 | 29-23 | 98-100 | 648-676 | 28-24 | 105-95 | 736-622 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 8-7 | 29-21 | 47-39 | 10-5 | 29-23 | 46-42 | 7-8 | 30-22 | 53-35 | | as a favorite | 15-11 | 55-44 | 364-372 | 13-13 | 49-50 | 364-366 | 18-8 | 70-31 | 518-234 | | as a road favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-2 | 7-4 | 46-40 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 49-40 | 1-2 | 9-3 | 63-27 | | in road games | 11-14 | 48-49 | 354-310 | 13-13 | 49-51 | 334-326 | 10-16 | 40-60 | 308-371 | | in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 4-4 | 14-11 | 23-21 | 5-3 | 15-11 | 26-19 | 3-5 | 12-14 | 23-22 | | in February games | 4-0 | 19-12 | 100-95 | 3-1 | 14-17 | 92-96 | 3-1 | 20-11 | 120-82 | | second half of the season | 4-0 | 43-38 | 318-294 | 3-1 | 40-41 | 298-307 | 3-1 | 46-36 | 365-272 | | on Sunday games | 0-2 | 8-12 | 78-90 | 1-1 | 7-13 | 81-85 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 76-94 | | against Pacific division opponents | 3-2 | 25-14 | 184-194 | 4-1 | 20-19 | 193-180 | 3-2 | 23-16 | 205-184 | | after 3 or more consecutive overs | 4-3 | 17-8 | 77-66 | 2-5 | 12-14 | 64-79 | 4-3 | 19-7 | 82-65 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 13-4 | 29-21 | 174-186 | 12-5 | 30-20 | 176-183 | 11-6 | 23-27 | 199-169 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 15-12 | 42-41 | 176-188 | 16-11 | 48-36 | 178-187 | 16-11 | 43-41 | 201-176 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 9-11 | 46-36 | 288-279 | 8-13 | 35-49 | 288-282 | 11-10 | 55-30 | 401-189 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 2-0 | 18-8 | 136-121 | 0-2 | 12-14 | 134-128 | 2-0 | 20-6 | 192-79 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 6-7 | 42-28 | 201-192 | 7-7 | 31-40 | 195-205 | 7-7 | 46-27 | 259-150 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-2 | 17-12 | 108-94 | 2-2 | 12-16 | 94-112 | 2-2 | 20-9 | 139-72 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 19-29 | 86-109 | 663-671 | 25-22 | 105-90 | 693-641 | 17-33 | 63-135 | 656-705 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 0-2 | 14-19 | 107-114 | 0-1 | 15-17 | 111-110 | 0-2 | 10-23 | 97-126 | | as an underdog | 15-23 | 70-86 | 342-362 | 20-16 | 86-69 | 374-320 | 9-29 | 40-117 | 203-512 | | as a home underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 2-4 | 12-19 | 41-50 | 4-2 | 19-12 | 56-34 | 2-4 | 9-22 | 27-65 | | in home games | 8-14 | 38-57 | 335-326 | 15-8 | 56-41 | 352-312 | 12-12 | 39-59 | 412-264 | | in a home game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 0-1 | 4-12 | 52-57 | 0-1 | 7-9 | 54-56 | 0-1 | 4-12 | 61-49 | | in February games | 1-2 | 17-12 | 104-96 | 0-3 | 17-12 | 113-89 | 0-3 | 9-20 | 97-112 | | second half of the season | 1-2 | 42-43 | 307-309 | 0-3 | 52-33 | 326-293 | 0-3 | 28-57 | 303-340 | | on Sunday games | 2-3 | 14-10 | 120-106 | 4-1 | 12-12 | 114-112 | 2-3 | 12-12 | 126-104 | | against Southwest division opponents | 0-6 | 14-26 | 68-79 | 4-2 | 27-13 | 89-61 | 0-6 | 9-31 | 47-107 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 8-11 | 45-57 | 355-364 | 9-9 | 56-45 | 383-332 | 6-14 | 25-78 | 284-457 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 1-3 | 20-27 | 204-192 | 0-3 | 29-17 | 211-186 | 0-4 | 10-37 | 156-254 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 6-9 | 32-35 | 191-191 | 9-6 | 37-31 | 191-193 | 9-8 | 27-43 | 203-198 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 14-8 | 99-93 | 0-0 | 12-9 | 97-98 | 0-1 | 11-11 | 102-100 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 5-7 | 33-41 | 199-204 | 7-3 | 42-30 | 224-178 | 3-9 | 20-54 | 148-266 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-3 | 18-18 | 114-114 | 0-2 | 21-14 | 130-100 | 0-3 | 11-25 | 79-157 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 28-24 | +2.2 | 28-23 | 29-23 | 106.0 | 53.1 | 46.1% | 52.1 | 102.9 | 52.0 | 45.7% | 50.0 | | Road Games | 10-16 | -3.8 | 11-14 | 13-13 | 101.8 | 50.3 | 44.7% | 52.2 | 102.3 | 51.8 | 45.7% | 50.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 117.0 | 62.8 | 51.6% | 51.2 | 107.8 | 57.0 | 47.0% | 45.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 106.0 | 53.1 | 38-83 | 46.1% | 10-28 | 36.7% | 19-25 | 75.5% | 52 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.5 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 101.8 | 50.3 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 10-28 | 34.9% | 19-25 | 74.8% | 52 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 102.9 | 52.0 | 39-85 | 45.7% | 8-22 | 36.7% | 17-21 | 77.5% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 98 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 102.3 | 51.8 | 38-84 | 45.7% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 18-23 | 78.6% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-33 | -11.3 | 19-29 | 25-22 | 95.8 | 47.0 | 43.7% | 48.9 | 103.1 | 52.3 | 46.5% | 52.5 | | Home Games | 12-12 | +0.6 | 8-14 | 15-8 | 100.8 | 50.5 | 46.1% | 49.8 | 104.3 | 50.1 | 46.5% | 48.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.8 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 85.8 | 41.2 | 40.7% | 43.2 | 100.0 | 54.0 | 51.3% | 53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 95.8 | 47.0 | 36-83 | 43.7% | 6-19 | 34.8% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 49 | 12 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.4 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 100.8 | 50.5 | 38-82 | 46.1% | 7-18 | 37.4% | 18-24 | 76.0% | 50 | 12 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 103.1 | 52.3 | 38-82 | 46.5% | 8-21 | 36.3% | 19-24 | 78.5% | 53 | 12 | 24 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.6 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 104.3 | 50.1 | 38-81 | 46.5% | 8-22 | 37.9% | 20-25 | 80.7% | 49 | 11 | 24 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: HOUSTON 96.4, SACRAMENTO 95.4 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 104-92 | W | -10 | W | 202.5 | U | 41-83 | 49.4% | 54 | 11 | 38-90 | 42.2% | 55 | 10 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 115-101 | W | 0 | W | 214 | O | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 112-104 | W | -6 | W | 213 | O | 37-79 | 46.8% | 56 | 17 | 36-91 | 39.6% | 54 | 13 | | 1/8/2013 | LA LAKERS | 125-112 | W | -8.5 | W | 223.5 | O | 48-87 | 55.2% | 50 | 18 | 43-91 | 47.3% | 43 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 79-88 | L | -2 | L | 200.5 | U | 30-75 | 40.0% | 47 | 22 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 53 | 16 | | 1/11/2013 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 3 | L | 201.5 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 52 | 14 | 41-79 | 51.9% | 52 | 16 | | 1/12/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 100-107 | L | 1 | L | 204 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 16 | 43-87 | 49.4% | 49 | 11 | | 1/15/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 109-117 | L | -4 | L | 206.5 | O | 41-82 | 50.0% | 48 | 15 | 42-78 | 53.8% | 44 | 16 | | 1/16/2013 | @ DALLAS | 100-105 | L | 4 | L | 214.5 | U | 33-84 | 39.3% | 62 | 16 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 58 | 10 | | 1/18/2013 | @ INDIANA | 95-105 | L | 4.5 | L | 195 | O | 34-83 | 41.0% | 47 | 18 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 54 | 13 | | 1/19/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-92 | L | -5.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 25-78 | 32.1% | 54 | 20 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 47 | 15 | | 1/21/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 100-94 | W | -7.5 | L | 208.5 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 60 | 13 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 45 | 10 | | 1/23/2013 | DENVER | 95-105 | L | -3 | L | 218 | U | 37-83 | 44.6% | 50 | 22 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 14 | | 1/25/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 100-82 | W | 2.5 | W | 200.5 | U | 34-71 | 47.9% | 50 | 21 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 44 | 15 | | 1/26/2013 | BROOKLYN | 119-106 | W | -4 | W | 200 | O | 43-87 | 49.4% | 60 | 11 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 37 | 10 | | 1/28/2013 | @ UTAH | 125-80 | W | 3.5 | W | 208 | U | 47-89 | 52.8% | 52 | 5 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 50 | 15 | | 1/30/2013 | @ DENVER | 110-118 | L | 4 | L | 216.5 | O | 39-81 | 48.1% | 52 | 21 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 51 | 20 | | 2/2/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 109-95 | W | -12 | W | 208.5 | U | 42-82 | 51.2% | 54 | 14 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 40 | 13 | | 2/5/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 140-109 | W | -2.5 | W | 217 | O | 46-91 | 50.5% | 59 | 8 | 41-86 | 47.7% | 47 | 12 | | 2/6/2013 | @ MIAMI | 108-114 | L | 7.5 | W | 206.5 | O | 39-80 | 48.7% | 47 | 16 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 44 | 10 | | 2/8/2013 | PORTLAND | 118-103 | W | -7.5 | W | 211 | O | 47-79 | 59.5% | 44 | 10 | 40-88 | 45.5% | 45 | 11 | | 2/10/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/1/2013 | @ DETROIT | 97-103 | L | 7 | W | 195.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 44 | 13 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 52 | 17 | | 1/2/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 97-94 | W | 3.5 | W | 200 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 51 | 10 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 60 | 13 | | 1/4/2013 | @ TORONTO | 105-96 | W | 7 | W | 196 | O | 40-76 | 52.6% | 52 | 17 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 54 | 15 | | 1/5/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 93-113 | L | 7 | L | 195.5 | O | 36-90 | 40.0% | 51 | 9 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 55 | 12 | | 1/7/2013 | MEMPHIS | 81-113 | L | 4 | L | 188.5 | O | 28-76 | 36.8% | 44 | 14 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 51 | 8 | | 1/10/2013 | DALLAS | 112-117 | L | -2.5 | L | 205 | O | 40-81 | 49.4% | 48 | 20 | 41-96 | 42.7% | 60 | 12 | | 1/12/2013 | MIAMI | 99-128 | L | 7.5 | L | 203.5 | O | 38-87 | 43.7% | 51 | 17 | 45-80 | 56.2% | 41 | 10 | | 1/14/2013 | CLEVELAND | 124-118 | W | -6 | T | 205 | O | 43-84 | 51.2% | 54 | 11 | 44-92 | 47.8% | 47 | 10 | | 1/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | 95-94 | W | -5 | L | 207 | U | 41-85 | 48.2% | 51 | 18 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 48 | 17 | | 1/18/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | 69-85 | L | 9.5 | L | 190.5 | U | 29-85 | 34.1% | 55 | 15 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 57 | 16 | | 1/19/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 97-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 204 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 46 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 54 | 13 | | 1/21/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 105-114 | L | 5.5 | L | 194 | O | 38-81 | 46.9% | 42 | 10 | 43-89 | 48.3% | 58 | 15 | | 1/23/2013 | PHOENIX | 96-106 | L | -3 | L | 202 | P | 38-79 | 48.1% | 62 | 24 | 43-90 | 47.8% | 37 | 11 | | 1/25/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 95-105 | L | 9.5 | L | 210 | U | 36-86 | 41.9% | 45 | 18 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 55 | 20 | | 1/26/2013 | @ DENVER | 93-121 | L | 12.5 | L | 214 | P | 37-88 | 42.0% | 52 | 19 | 47-89 | 52.8% | 55 | 15 | | 1/28/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-94 | W | 7 | W | 204 | U | 36-82 | 43.9% | 47 | 10 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 53 | 20 | | 1/30/2013 | @ BOSTON | 81-99 | L | 7 | L | 194 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 48 | 18 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 44 | 16 | | 2/1/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 80-89 | L | 6 | L | 199 | U | 30-79 | 38.0% | 40 | 13 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 60 | 18 | | 2/2/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 81-120 | L | 10.5 | L | 204 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 35 | 18 | 47-86 | 54.7% | 58 | 17 | | 2/4/2013 | @ UTAH | 91-98 | L | 8.5 | W | 198.5 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 46 | 13 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 50 | 20 | | 2/9/2013 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| HOUSTON is 29-28 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | HOUSTON is 34-26 straight up against SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | 30 of 58 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| HOUSTON is 6-1 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | | HOUSTON is 6-1 straight up against SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| HOUSTON is 16-10 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | SACRAMENTO is 15-14 straight up against HOUSTON since 1996 | | 17 of 28 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| HOUSTON is 3-0 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | | HOUSTON is 3-0 straight up against SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2012 | HOUSTON | 104 | -4 | SU ATS | 58 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 54 | 16 | 10 | | | SACRAMENTO | 87 | 209 | Under | 43 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 20-37 | 54.1% | 55 | 15 | 21 | 03/26/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 106 | 211.5 | Over | 51 | 41-96 | 42.7% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 54 | 18 | 17 | | | HOUSTON | 113 | -6 | SU ATS | 42 | 43-89 | 48.3% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 58 | 13 | 19 | 01/13/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 89 | 200 | Under | 52 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 40 | 6 | 11 | | | HOUSTON | 103 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 40-89 | 44.9% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 59 | 18 | 12 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in HOUSTON games 51.9% of the time since 1996. (542-502) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in HOUSTON games 51.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (83-77) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 48.8% of the time since 1996. (521-546) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 49.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (72-74) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in HOUSTON games 54% of the time since 1996. (627-534) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in HOUSTON games 49.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (89-92) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 51.3% of the time since 1996. (598-567) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 53.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (93-80) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 02/08/2013 - Toney Douglas injured last game, "?" Sunday vs. Sacramento ( Hip ) | |
| [C] 02/08/2013 - DeMarcus Cousins probable Saturday vs. Utah ( Not Suspended ) |
|
|