|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 28-21 | 105-95 | 444-433 | 27-23 | 92-111 | 426-452 | 17-33 | 86-118 | 424-466 | | as an underdog | 24-17 | 81-57 | 259-231 | 21-20 | 64-76 | 231-260 | 12-29 | 50-90 | 166-331 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 4-1 | 16-7 | 39-51 | 5-0 | 9-14 | 39-48 | 2-3 | 12-11 | 31-59 | | in road games | 18-8 | 59-42 | 223-215 | 18-9 | 52-52 | 218-224 | 9-18 | 38-66 | 170-277 | | in a road game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 4-3 | 11-10 | 35-47 | 6-2 | 11-12 | 40-46 | 3-5 | 10-13 | 36-50 | | in February games | 2-2 | 12-18 | 62-69 | 3-1 | 15-14 | 73-56 | 2-2 | 10-20 | 65-66 | | second half of the season | 2-2 | 43-44 | 193-204 | 3-1 | 43-44 | 200-196 | 2-2 | 36-52 | 185-216 | | on Sunday games | 2-2 | 10-14 | 42-47 | 1-3 | 8-16 | 38-51 | 1-3 | 9-15 | 37-53 | | against Atlantic division opponents | 2-4 | 8-13 | 69-76 | 2-4 | 7-13 | 66-77 | 2-4 | 9-12 | 73-73 | | after a non-conference game | 7-9 | 28-35 | 165-128 | 9-8 | 29-35 | 146-149 | 5-12 | 27-38 | 160-141 | | in non-conference games | 8-9 | 35-29 | 151-145 | 9-9 | 25-40 | 146-150 | 8-10 | 34-32 | 149-153 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 8-8 | 29-26 | 96-85 | 7-9 | 23-32 | 80-104 | 4-12 | 20-35 | 73-111 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 19-14 | 66-53 | 241-203 | 17-16 | 57-62 | 201-245 | 10-23 | 49-71 | 200-250 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 6-5 | 29-20 | 83-79 | 4-7 | 19-30 | 75-87 | 5-6 | 23-26 | 76-87 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 1-3 | 11-14 | 71-92 | 1-3 | 8-18 | 79-86 | 1-3 | 10-16 | 72-95 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 6-3 | 16-8 | 86-69 | 5-4 | 12-13 | 70-84 | 2-7 | 10-15 | 84-73 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 10-6 | 40-38 | 188-180 | 13-4 | 37-41 | 196-173 | 7-10 | 38-41 | 217-155 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 2-1 | 15-13 | 90-81 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 90-81 | 1-2 | 15-13 | 107-65 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 9-6 | 31-38 | 140-163 | 12-4 | 33-38 | 152-153 | 6-10 | 35-36 | 170-138 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 3-2 | 17-17 | 80-82 | 3-2 | 14-21 | 79-83 | 1-4 | 20-15 | 94-70 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 26-23 | 98-95 | 643-647 | 26-24 | 91-106 | 642-642 | 18-32 | 63-135 | 549-772 | | as a favorite | 7-6 | 21-22 | 217-226 | 5-8 | 15-28 | 213-233 | 8-5 | 24-19 | 293-159 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 4-2 | 11-8 | 72-68 | 2-4 | 7-12 | 73-69 | 5-1 | 12-7 | 89-56 | | in home games | 14-11 | 48-49 | 309-335 | 10-15 | 43-56 | 314-331 | 12-13 | 41-58 | 332-327 | | in a home game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 4-5 | 11-12 | 57-57 | 3-6 | 7-16 | 54-60 | 4-5 | 11-12 | 55-61 | | in February games | 2-2 | 15-12 | 98-88 | 2-2 | 14-13 | 95-87 | 2-2 | 9-19 | 81-114 | | second half of the season | 2-2 | 42-37 | 283-312 | 2-2 | 35-45 | 289-307 | 2-2 | 27-54 | 253-371 | | on Sunday games | 5-4 | 18-14 | 127-123 | 4-5 | 14-18 | 132-121 | 4-5 | 14-18 | 118-139 | | against Southwest division opponents | 5-3 | 15-7 | 43-37 | 4-4 | 11-13 | 37-47 | 3-5 | 9-16 | 33-52 | | in non-conference games | 11-12 | 34-34 | 212-226 | 12-11 | 32-38 | 222-215 | 8-15 | 24-47 | 176-276 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 6-3 | 16-20 | 114-121 | 5-4 | 21-17 | 114-122 | 5-4 | 11-27 | 106-136 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 13-9 | 45-43 | 296-287 | 11-11 | 37-51 | 282-297 | 12-10 | 37-52 | 321-286 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 14-18 | 140-133 | 0-1 | 9-23 | 128-146 | 0-1 | 9-23 | 158-128 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-33 | +1.5 | 28-21 | 27-23 | 93.9 | 46.1 | 45.1% | 48.4 | 97.9 | 49.1 | 46.6% | 48.0 | | Road Games | 9-18 | +9 | 18-8 | 18-9 | 96.6 | 46.0 | 45.2% | 48.6 | 100.4 | 51.4 | 47.4% | 47.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 97.4 | 46.0 | 49.1% | 44.8 | 103.2 | 53.6 | 50.7% | 45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 93.9 | 46.1 | 36-80 | 45.1% | 7-19 | 37.3% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 48 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.1 | 37-83 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 96.6 | 46.0 | 36-80 | 45.2% | 7-19 | 38.7% | 17-21 | 79.6% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.9 | 49.1 | 37-79 | 46.6% | 8-21 | 36.3% | 16-22 | 74.0% | 48 | 10 | 24 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 99 | 49.7 | 37-82 | 45.4% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 100.4 | 51.4 | 38-80 | 47.4% | 8-22 | 37.2% | 17-23 | 73.6% | 48 | 10 | 25 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 18-32 | -10.7 | 26-23 | 26-24 | 97.5 | 48.8 | 44.2% | 48.3 | 99.3 | 48.3 | 46.2% | 51.9 | | Home Games | 12-13 | -4.2 | 14-11 | 10-15 | 98.2 | 49.0 | 44.4% | 49.7 | 95.5 | 46.0 | 45.5% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 94.0 | 48.0 | 41.8% | 54.0 | 92.6 | 44.0 | 45.8% | 48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 97.5 | 48.8 | 36-83 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 48 | 11 | 22 | 23 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.6 | 49 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 98.2 | 49.0 | 37-84 | 44.4% | 7-22 | 34.3% | 16-22 | 75.4% | 50 | 12 | 24 | 22 | 9 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.3 | 48.3 | 37-79 | 46.2% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 20-26 | 75.2% | 52 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.4 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 95.5 | 46.0 | 35-78 | 45.5% | 5-17 | 32.3% | 20-25 | 77.5% | 50 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEW ORLEANS 96.9, TORONTO 95.4 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/1/2013 | ATLANTA | 86-95 | L | 2 | L | 184.5 | U | 36-82 | 43.9% | 54 | 13 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 46 | 5 | | 1/2/2013 | @ HOUSTON | 92-104 | L | 10 | L | 202.5 | U | 38-90 | 42.2% | 55 | 10 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 54 | 11 | | 1/5/2013 | @ DALLAS | 99-96 | W | 6 | W | 193.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 50 | 10 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 48 | 9 | | 1/7/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 95-88 | W | 8 | W | 193.5 | U | 40-83 | 48.2% | 45 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 44 | 19 | | 1/9/2013 | HOUSTON | 88-79 | W | 2 | W | 200.5 | U | 35-84 | 41.7% | 53 | 16 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 47 | 22 | | 1/11/2013 | MINNESOTA | 104-92 | W | -3 | W | 181.5 | O | 44-84 | 52.4% | 46 | 12 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | | 1/13/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 87-100 | L | 7 | L | 190 | U | 33-82 | 40.2% | 53 | 13 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 53 | 9 | | 1/15/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 111-99 | W | 3 | W | 184 | O | 44-83 | 53.0% | 54 | 14 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 36 | 13 | | 1/16/2013 | @ BOSTON | 90-78 | W | 8.5 | W | 182 | U | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 17 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 40 | 15 | | 1/19/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 112-116 | L | -5 | L | 188 | O | 45-79 | 57.0% | 47 | 16 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 41 | 14 | | 1/21/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 114-105 | W | -5.5 | W | 194 | O | 43-89 | 48.3% | 58 | 15 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 42 | 10 | | 1/23/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 102-106 | L | 8.5 | W | 195 | O | 38-81 | 46.9% | 54 | 13 | 43-80 | 53.7% | 44 | 8 | | 1/25/2013 | HOUSTON | 82-100 | L | -2.5 | L | 200.5 | U | 31-80 | 38.7% | 44 | 15 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 50 | 21 | | 1/27/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | 91-83 | W | 7.5 | W | 177.5 | U | 33-77 | 42.9% | 54 | 15 | 32-88 | 36.4% | 55 | 15 | | 1/29/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 106-111 | L | 8 | W | 196 | O | 39-92 | 42.4% | 44 | 9 | 39-79 | 49.4% | 63 | 14 | | 1/30/2013 | @ UTAH | 99-104 | L | 8.5 | W | 188.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 12 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | | 2/1/2013 | @ DENVER | 98-113 | L | 7.5 | L | 205 | O | 38-72 | 52.8% | 43 | 21 | 44-84 | 52.4% | 38 | 8 | | 2/2/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-115 | L | 4 | L | 188.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 38 | 23 | 45-77 | 58.4% | 51 | 18 | | 2/6/2013 | PHOENIX | 93-84 | W | -6.5 | W | 195 | U | 39-75 | 52.0% | 41 | 11 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 46 | 16 | | 2/8/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 111-100 | W | 5 | W | 192.5 | O | 45-86 | 52.3% | 50 | 13 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 42 | 17 | | 2/10/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2013 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2013 | PORTLAND | 102-79 | W | -4 | W | 192 | U | 41-77 | 53.2% | 45 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 18 | | 1/4/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 96-105 | L | -7 | L | 196 | O | 30-79 | 38.0% | 54 | 15 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 52 | 17 | | 1/6/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 92-104 | L | 6.5 | L | 196.5 | U | 34-76 | 44.7% | 42 | 16 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 46 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 90-72 | W | -5 | W | 189.5 | U | 39-80 | 48.7% | 51 | 11 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 44 | 13 | | 1/11/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 99-78 | W | -8 | W | 194.5 | U | 39-86 | 45.3% | 51 | 11 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 13 | | 1/13/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-107 | L | -3 | L | 192.5 | O | 36-85 | 42.4% | 55 | 15 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 41 | 12 | | 1/15/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 106-113 | L | 7 | T | 189.5 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 50 | 13 | 40-81 | 49.4% | 40 | 6 | | 1/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 105-107 | L | 4.5 | W | 183 | O | 38-85 | 44.7% | 53 | 12 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 60 | 14 | | 1/18/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 101-108 | L | 4.5 | L | 190 | O | 40-88 | 45.5% | 51 | 18 | 47-91 | 51.6% | 48 | 11 | | 1/20/2013 | LA LAKERS | 108-103 | W | 4 | W | 201.5 | O | 46-84 | 54.8% | 50 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 48 | 13 | | 1/23/2013 | @ MIAMI | 116-123 | L | 10 | W | 194.5 | O | 44-88 | 50.0% | 35 | 8 | 45-82 | 54.9% | 64 | 13 | | 1/24/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 97-95 | W | 4 | W | 198.5 | U | 39-78 | 50.0% | 42 | 10 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | | 1/26/2013 | CLEVELAND | 98-99 | L | -7 | L | 201 | U | 40-82 | 48.8% | 45 | 15 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 46 | 15 | | 1/28/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 102-114 | L | 2 | L | 201 | O | 38-87 | 43.7% | 42 | 10 | 46-86 | 53.5% | 54 | 13 | | 1/30/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 92-93 | L | 7 | W | 196.5 | U | 33-85 | 38.8% | 59 | 17 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 45 | 17 | | 2/1/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 98-73 | W | 4 | W | 193 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 56 | 12 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 52 | 14 | | 2/3/2013 | MIAMI | 85-100 | L | 5 | L | 194.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 52 | 15 | 40-75 | 53.3% | 43 | 12 | | 2/6/2013 | BOSTON | 95-99 | L | -4 | L | 192 | O | 34-82 | 41.5% | 47 | 15 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 13 | | 2/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | 100-98 | W | 7 | W | 189.5 | O | 42-96 | 43.7% | 56 | 14 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 55 | 18 | | 2/10/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| NEW ORLEANS is 24-21 against the spread versus TORONTO since 1996 | | NEW ORLEANS is 27-20 straight up against TORONTO since 1996 | | 25 of 44 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| TORONTO is 4-0 against the spread versus NEW ORLEANS over the last 3 seasons | | TORONTO is 3-1 straight up against NEW ORLEANS over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW ORLEANS is 13-9 against the spread versus TORONTO since 1996 | | NEW ORLEANS is 13-10 straight up against TORONTO since 1996 | | 14 of 22 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| TORONTO is 1-0 against the spread versus NEW ORLEANS over the last 3 seasons | | TORONTO is 1-0 straight up against NEW ORLEANS over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2012 | TORONTO | 104 | 182.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 25-32 | 78.1% | 47 | 9 | 7 | | | NEW ORLEANS | 97 | -3 | Over | 42 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 59 | 11 | 16 | 02/29/2012 | TORONTO | 95 | 179 | SU ATS | 51 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 47 | 7 | 10 | | | NEW ORLEANS | 84 | -3 | | 46 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 57 | 14 | 10 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW ORLEANS games 50.8% of the time since 1996. (558-540) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW ORLEANS games 48.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (79-83) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TORONTO games 49.1% of the time since 1996. (509-527) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TORONTO games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (76-76) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW ORLEANS games 48.8% of the time since 1996. (569-597) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW ORLEANS games 49.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (86-87) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TORONTO games 50.6% of the time since 1996. (569-555) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TORONTO games 46.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (83-96) | |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 01/12/2013 - Linas Kleiza out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 02/01/2013 - Mickael Pietrus out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [F] 02/08/2013 - Landry Fields "?" Sunday vs. New Orleans ( Back ) |
|
|