|
|
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
---|
|
|
|
BOSTON | |  | UTAH | -2 | |
|
|
|
All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
in all games | 24-28 | 107-118 | 701-716 | 27-27 | 108-120 | 708-700 | 29-26 | 140-92 | 740-704 | as an underdog | 9-11 | 38-36 | 351-321 | 12-10 | 38-38 | 353-319 | 8-14 | 30-46 | 233-455 | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 2-2 | 10-10 | 98-82 | 3-2 | 9-12 | 89-91 | 2-3 | 7-14 | 78-105 | in road games | 9-15 | 50-63 | 363-340 | 13-13 | 52-61 | 366-336 | 9-17 | 52-63 | 301-417 | in a road game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 3-6 | 8-11 | 71-82 | 5-5 | 7-13 | 79-75 | 4-6 | 11-9 | 69-86 | in February games | 7-3 | 15-20 | 96-107 | 6-4 | 16-17 | 109-85 | 7-3 | 21-14 | 99-107 | second half of the season | 7-3 | 47-48 | 316-325 | 6-4 | 39-54 | 327-305 | 7-3 | 60-36 | 329-326 | against Northwest division opponents | 5-0 | 13-8 | 47-34 | 3-2 | 8-13 | 44-36 | 5-1 | 16-6 | 55-27 | in non-conference games | 10-11 | 30-39 | 216-239 | 10-11 | 33-35 | 230-221 | 12-10 | 38-32 | 230-235 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 13-14 | 60-63 | 374-367 | 14-14 | 59-65 | 372-371 | 14-14 | 66-59 | 324-434 | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 3-2 | 33-34 | 206-205 | 3-2 | 31-36 | 206-205 | 3-2 | 37-30 | 178-244 |
|
|
|
|
in all games | 27-28 | 96-108 | 710-689 | 27-28 | 100-104 | 703-701 | 31-25 | 106-102 | 830-601 | as a favorite | 16-13 | 49-53 | 440-399 | 11-18 | 46-55 | 412-431 | 22-7 | 70-32 | 627-233 | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 6-3 | 11-10 | 86-68 | 2-7 | 6-14 | 62-90 | 6-3 | 13-8 | 111-47 | in home games | 17-10 | 52-50 | 370-327 | 12-15 | 45-56 | 333-369 | 21-6 | 67-36 | 513-202 | in a home game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 1-1 | 10-12 | 69-72 | 2-0 | 14-8 | 73-72 | 1-1 | 12-10 | 100-46 | in February games | 5-5 | 15-21 | 107-93 | 5-5 | 16-20 | 102-96 | 6-4 | 13-24 | 126-77 | second half of the season | 5-5 | 40-48 | 333-307 | 5-5 | 43-45 | 313-327 | 6-4 | 40-51 | 396-262 | against Atlantic division opponents | 3-1 | 10-11 | 101-74 | 3-1 | 14-7 | 89-90 | 3-2 | 11-11 | 121-61 | in non-conference games | 11-7 | 38-28 | 242-217 | 10-8 | 41-24 | 249-216 | 13-6 | 42-25 | 292-183 | revenging a loss vs opponent | 10-14 | 44-52 | 279-293 | 16-8 | 46-50 | 275-300 | 11-14 | 44-55 | 306-282 | after allowing 105 points or more | 6-8 | 33-31 | 159-142 | 8-6 | 33-30 | 161-139 | 9-6 | 37-28 | 192-119 | after a loss by 10 points or more | 8-6 | 30-24 | 137-136 | 8-6 | 28-27 | 134-141 | 9-5 | 29-26 | 159-120 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 11-13 | 46-56 | 367-360 | 12-12 | 54-49 | 363-367 | 10-15 | 41-65 | 367-384 | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 5-3 | 22-25 | 208-193 | 4-4 | 26-22 | 187-216 | 5-3 | 19-30 | 204-207 |
|
|
|
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
---|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 29-26 | -4.8 | 24-28 | 27-27 | 96.1 | 48.3 | 45.9% | 48.0 | 96.0 | 46.6 | 44.1% | 52.5 | Road Games | 9-17 | -8.2 | 9-15 | 13-13 | 94.5 | 49.5 | 44.8% | 47.7 | 99.4 | 49.9 | 45.5% | 51.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 92.8 | 48.2 | 45.3% | 47.2 | 92.2 | 46.4 | 43.0% | 55.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 96.1 | 48.3 | 37-80 | 45.9% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 16-21 | 77.9% | 48 | 9 | 23 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.5 | 49.5 | 36-81 | 44.8% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 48 | 10 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.0 | 46.6 | 36-81 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 18-24 | 72.0% | 52 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 97.6 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 74.7% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.4 | 49.9 | 36-80 | 45.5% | 7-20 | 37.2% | 19-26 | 74.5% | 51 | 11 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 31-25 | +6.5 | 27-28 | 27-28 | 98.5 | 48.6 | 45.2% | 50.6 | 98.8 | 48.7 | 45.9% | 49.7 | Home Games | 21-6 | +14.1 | 17-10 | 12-15 | 100.9 | 52.1 | 46.4% | 52.4 | 95.7 | 48.0 | 43.5% | 48.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 104.8 | 52.2 | 46.4% | 48.4 | 103.0 | 51.6 | 47.6% | 50.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 98.5 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 19-24 | 76.8% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 98.4 | 49.5 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 100.9 | 52.1 | 37-81 | 46.4% | 6-16 | 37.3% | 20-26 | 77.3% | 52 | 11 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 98.8 | 48.7 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 7-18 | 37.3% | 18-24 | 74.3% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 98.5 | 49.4 | 37-82 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-23 | 75.1% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 95.7 | 48.0 | 35-81 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 18-25 | 75.2% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON 95.6, UTAH 96.1 |
|
|
Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
---|
|
|
|
|
1/16/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 78-90 | L | -8.5 | L | 182 | U | 34-74 | 45.9% | 40 | 15 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 17 | 1/18/2013 | CHICAGO | 99-100 | L | -2.5 | L | 181.5 | O | 38-91 | 41.8% | 55 | 11 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 54 | 21 | 1/20/2013 | @ DETROIT | 88-103 | L | -2 | L | 184 | O | 33-83 | 39.8% | 49 | 18 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 59 | 20 | 1/22/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-95 | L | -4.5 | L | 190 | U | 32-84 | 38.1% | 55 | 16 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 48 | 13 | 1/24/2013 | NEW YORK | 86-89 | L | 1.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 31-76 | 40.8% | 52 | 12 | 32-83 | 38.6% | 54 | 10 | 1/25/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 111-123 | L | 5.5 | L | 185 | O | 42-93 | 45.2% | 55 | 21 | 42-94 | 44.7% | 57 | 12 | 1/27/2013 | MIAMI | 100-98 | W | 5 | W | 188 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 56 | 14 | 39-96 | 40.6% | 62 | 20 | 1/30/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 99-81 | W | -7 | W | 194 | U | 39-73 | 53.4% | 44 | 16 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 48 | 18 | 2/1/2013 | ORLANDO | 97-84 | W | -8 | W | 191 | U | 42-84 | 50.0% | 56 | 14 | 36-95 | 37.9% | 50 | 14 | 2/3/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 106-104 | W | 1.5 | W | 182.5 | O | 36-72 | 50.0% | 37 | 17 | 40-79 | 50.6% | 48 | 20 | 2/6/2013 | @ TORONTO | 99-95 | W | 4 | W | 192 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 13 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 47 | 15 | 2/7/2013 | LA LAKERS | 116-95 | W | -1.5 | W | 194 | O | 46-87 | 52.9% | 54 | 9 | 36-87 | 41.4% | 56 | 12 | 2/10/2013 | DENVER | 118-114 | W | -2 | W | 206.5 | O | 43-108 | 39.8% | 66 | 16 | 48-113 | 42.5% | 76 | 21 | 2/11/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 91-94 | L | -4.5 | L | 191 | U | 32-77 | 41.6% | 48 | 10 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 56 | 10 | 2/13/2013 | CHICAGO | 71-69 | W | -2.5 | L | 181.5 | U | 28-76 | 36.8% | 43 | 10 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 59 | 20 | 2/19/2013 | @ DENVER | 90-97 | L | 9 | W | 204 | U | 35-79 | 44.3% | 49 | 12 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 54 | 7 | 2/20/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 99-113 | L | 7 | L | 193.5 | O | 39-82 | 47.6% | 44 | 12 | 42-83 | 50.6% | 57 | 12 | 2/22/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 113-88 | W | -1 | W | 189.5 | O | 44-79 | 55.7% | 52 | 12 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 49 | 13 | 2/24/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/1/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/10/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/12/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/19/2013 | CLEVELAND | 109-98 | W | -8.5 | W | 199 | O | 45-90 | 50.0% | 53 | 8 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 9 | 1/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 92-88 | W | -7 | L | 195 | U | 38-85 | 44.7% | 57 | 14 | 31-86 | 36.0% | 58 | 15 | 1/25/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 84-102 | L | 5 | L | 205 | U | 34-81 | 42.0% | 37 | 10 | 43-80 | 53.7% | 56 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | INDIANA | 114-110 | W | -2 | W | 183 | O | 44-83 | 53.0% | 36 | 14 | 44-81 | 54.3% | 46 | 21 | 1/28/2013 | HOUSTON | 80-125 | L | -3.5 | L | 208 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 50 | 15 | 47-89 | 52.8% | 52 | 5 | 1/30/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 104-99 | W | -8.5 | L | 188.5 | O | 34-68 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 12 | 2/1/2013 | PORTLAND | 86-77 | W | -5 | W | 195 | U | 35-81 | 43.2% | 59 | 13 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 46 | 15 | 2/2/2013 | @ PORTLAND | 99-105 | L | 4.5 | L | 191.5 | O | 39-90 | 43.3% | 39 | 4 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 61 | 16 | 2/4/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 98-91 | W | -8.5 | L | 198.5 | U | 38-72 | 52.8% | 50 | 20 | 35-87 | 40.2% | 46 | 13 | 2/6/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 100-86 | W | -5.5 | W | 200 | U | 39-81 | 48.1% | 62 | 19 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 49 | 16 | 2/8/2013 | CHICAGO | 89-93 | L | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 37-78 | 47.4% | 44 | 12 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 48 | 9 | 2/9/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | 109-120 | L | 1.5 | L | 197 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 42 | 18 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 53 | 16 | 2/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 109-94 | W | 6 | W | 200.5 | O | 42-87 | 48.3% | 50 | 17 | 38-68 | 55.9% | 39 | 20 | 2/13/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 97-93 | W | 2 | W | 193 | U | 38-87 | 43.7% | 61 | 14 | 29-85 | 34.1% | 58 | 10 | 2/19/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 115-101 | W | -3.5 | W | 203 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 11 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 49 | 13 | 2/23/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 94-107 | L | 10 | L | 197.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 43 | 16 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 54 | 20 | 2/25/2013 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/1/2013 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
---|
|
|
BOSTON is 15-14 against the spread versus UTAH since 1996 | BOSTON is 16-14 straight up against UTAH since 1996 | 20 of 29 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
BOSTON is 3-0 against the spread versus UTAH over the last 3 seasons | BOSTON is 4-0 straight up against UTAH over the last 3 seasons | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
UTAH is 7-7 against the spread versus BOSTON since 1996 | UTAH is 8-6 straight up against BOSTON since 1996 | 11 of 14 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
BOSTON is 1-0 against the spread versus UTAH over the last 3 seasons | BOSTON is 1-0 straight up against UTAH over the last 3 seasons | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2012 | UTAH | 93 | 191 | | 46 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 57 | 18 | 12 | | BOSTON | 98 | -5 | SU | 44 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 22-29 | 75.9% | 43 | 4 | 9 | 03/28/2012 | UTAH | 82 | 188.5 | Under | 35 | 32-82 | 39.0% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 55 | 16 | 14 | | BOSTON | 94 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 48 | 4 | 11 |
|
|
|
Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
---|
|
|
The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOSTON games 48.6% of the time since 1996. (545-577) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOSTON games 51.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (96-90) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.2% of the time since 1996. (571-544) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (84-78) | |
|
The betting public is correct when moving the total in BOSTON games 51% of the time since 1996. (639-614) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in BOSTON games 50.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (106-105) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 51.1% of the time since 1996. (630-602) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 56.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (100-76) | |
|
|
|
|
[G] 01/29/2013 - Rajon Rondo out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 02/01/2013 - Jared Sullinger out for season ( Back ) | |
[G] 12/27/2012 - Raja Bell out indefinitely ( Personal ) | [G] 12/27/2012 - Mo Williams out indefinitely ( Thumb ) |
|
|