|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 23-34 | 95-130 | 720-781 | 29-27 | 112-113 | 757-732 | 28-29 | 135-92 | 983-546 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 6-5 | 11-10 | 85-87 | 5-5 | 8-12 | 86-87 | 4-7 | 12-9 | 119-56 | | as an underdog | 5-12 | 20-33 | 188-185 | 11-5 | 30-21 | 169-200 | 3-14 | 16-37 | 142-239 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-2 | 2-7 | 31-27 | 3-0 | 7-2 | 26-32 | 0-3 | 0-9 | 15-45 | | in road games | 10-18 | 48-64 | 364-384 | 15-13 | 56-56 | 369-373 | 10-18 | 55-58 | 405-357 | | in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 4-3 | 6-4 | 45-32 | 4-3 | 5-5 | 39-40 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 45-34 | | in February games | 5-6 | 20-17 | 112-104 | 6-5 | 19-17 | 106-108 | 8-3 | 25-12 | 145-76 | | second half of the season | 5-6 | 43-52 | 314-346 | 6-5 | 51-44 | 329-326 | 8-3 | 65-31 | 450-232 | | when playing on back-to-back days | 4-6 | 21-24 | 149-155 | 3-7 | 22-23 | 154-141 | 4-6 | 26-19 | 180-130 | | against Northwest division opponents | 6-7 | 27-32 | 93-100 | 8-4 | 29-31 | 95-102 | 6-7 | 35-26 | 126-74 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 5-6 | 13-18 | 91-84 | 4-7 | 13-18 | 80-96 | 4-7 | 15-16 | 106-77 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 15-17 | 40-50 | 257-258 | 16-15 | 44-46 | 265-249 | 15-17 | 49-42 | 329-204 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 0-2 | 5-10 | 65-72 | 2-0 | 8-7 | 64-68 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 86-54 | | after 3 or more consecutive wins | 2-4 | 22-31 | 201-225 | 4-2 | 23-30 | 223-198 | 2-4 | 33-20 | 286-150 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 13-17 | 59-66 | 417-435 | 16-13 | 65-60 | 412-438 | 12-18 | 69-58 | 511-363 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 4-3 | 31-34 | 258-267 | 4-3 | 36-30 | 246-281 | 4-3 | 36-30 | 320-219 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 7-11 | 32-47 | 217-236 | 8-10 | 32-47 | 224-224 | 10-8 | 52-27 | 329-133 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-3 | 13-20 | 124-120 | 1-4 | 15-18 | 124-119 | 4-1 | 22-11 | 175-74 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 10-12 | 39-56 | 233-247 | 14-7 | 44-51 | 229-252 | 8-14 | 47-49 | 290-200 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-2 | 20-27 | 143-146 | 2-2 | 23-25 | 137-154 | 2-2 | 25-23 | 177-119 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 33-24 | 120-94 | 682-659 | 34-22 | 105-104 | 674-660 | 35-22 | 127-90 | 644-724 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 9-0 | 36-19 | 129-119 | 4-4 | 29-24 | 125-120 | 9-0 | 43-14 | 158-95 | | as a favorite | 22-15 | 69-61 | 299-280 | 20-16 | 61-68 | 302-270 | 28-9 | 95-38 | 416-170 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 4-3 | 9-10 | 66-49 | 4-3 | 9-8 | 66-46 | 6-1 | 17-3 | 98-20 | | in home games | 17-9 | 54-48 | 347-318 | 14-11 | 47-53 | 336-321 | 23-3 | 79-26 | 417-261 | | in a home game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 5-0 | 17-14 | 72-65 | 3-1 | 18-12 | 70-64 | 5-0 | 28-5 | 105-35 | | in February games | 6-4 | 21-17 | 97-111 | 8-2 | 21-17 | 115-86 | 6-4 | 18-20 | 88-125 | | second half of the season | 6-4 | 54-40 | 320-316 | 8-2 | 41-51 | 322-306 | 6-4 | 53-42 | 295-357 | | against Pacific division opponents | 8-4 | 31-22 | 196-184 | 9-2 | 24-28 | 186-192 | 8-4 | 32-22 | 170-226 | | after a non-conference game | 13-10 | 41-29 | 226-229 | 16-7 | 42-27 | 246-205 | 12-11 | 42-29 | 207-260 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 10-5 | 36-27 | 166-149 | 8-6 | 28-32 | 151-160 | 11-4 | 39-25 | 179-142 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 16-14 | 49-56 | 249-240 | 19-10 | 48-51 | 248-235 | 20-10 | 61-44 | 272-225 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 13-8 | 48-37 | 274-283 | 12-8 | 46-35 | 294-254 | 15-6 | 60-26 | 322-247 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 5-1 | 22-13 | 136-132 | 4-1 | 18-15 | 140-121 | 4-2 | 22-13 | 152-119 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 14-5 | 43-31 | 197-199 | 9-9 | 37-36 | 204-193 | 15-4 | 51-26 | 233-172 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 6-0 | 24-12 | 109-108 | 3-2 | 15-20 | 105-112 | 5-1 | 22-15 | 120-101 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 11-5 | 42-28 | 200-191 | 10-6 | 35-35 | 195-200 | 11-5 | 42-31 | 182-223 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-0 | 19-13 | 105-108 | 1-1 | 11-20 | 104-108 | 2-0 | 16-17 | 94-126 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 28-29 | -15.9 | 23-34 | 29-27 | 102.0 | 52.4 | 45.8% | 54.6 | 100.9 | 51.9 | 45.3% | 51.0 | | Road Games | 10-18 | -10.9 | 10-18 | 15-13 | 101.6 | 51.2 | 44.8% | 53.0 | 104.1 | 53.2 | 46.7% | 50.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 103.8 | 55.8 | 47.7% | 52.0 | 103.0 | 55.0 | 46.9% | 50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 102.0 | 52.4 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 9-24 | 35.4% | 19-27 | 69.5% | 55 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 98.3 | 49.4 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 17-23 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 101.6 | 51.2 | 36-81 | 44.8% | 9-25 | 35.7% | 20-27 | 73.3% | 53 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 100.9 | 51.9 | 39-87 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 15-20 | 72.4% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.6 | 49.5 | 37-82 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.8% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 104.1 | 53.2 | 41-87 | 46.7% | 8-20 | 39.4% | 15-21 | 73.6% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 35-22 | +1 | 33-24 | 34-22 | 105.2 | 52.2 | 47.2% | 54.9 | 101.6 | 51.9 | 44.4% | 51.7 | | Home Games | 23-3 | +10.4 | 17-9 | 14-11 | 108.7 | 52.8 | 47.8% | 55.3 | 98.8 | 50.1 | 44.5% | 50.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 107.8 | 56.4 | 49.9% | 47.2 | 107.2 | 56.8 | 47.7% | 49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 105.2 | 52.2 | 40-85 | 47.2% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 18-26 | 69.3% | 55 | 13 | 24 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 98 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 108.7 | 52.8 | 41-86 | 47.8% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 20-28 | 69.9% | 55 | 14 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 101.6 | 51.9 | 38-86 | 44.4% | 8-23 | 36.8% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents averaging | 98 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.7% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 98.8 | 50.1 | 37-84 | 44.5% | 8-23 | 34.7% | 16-22 | 72.9% | 51 | 11 | 23 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LA LAKERS 96, DENVER 95 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/17/2013 | MIAMI | 90-99 | L | -2.5 | L | 207 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 57 | 20 | 40-83 | 48.2% | 43 | 6 | | 1/20/2013 | @ TORONTO | 103-108 | L | -4 | L | 201.5 | O | 38-88 | 43.2% | 48 | 13 | 46-84 | 54.8% | 50 | 15 | | 1/21/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 83-95 | L | 0 | L | 194.5 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 62 | 15 | 39-93 | 41.9% | 52 | 8 | | 1/23/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | 93-106 | L | 3.5 | L | 188 | O | 31-73 | 42.5% | 44 | 15 | 47-96 | 49.0% | 57 | 12 | | 1/25/2013 | UTAH | 102-84 | W | -5 | W | 205 | U | 43-80 | 53.7% | 56 | 18 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 37 | 10 | | 1/27/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 105-96 | W | 3.5 | W | 208 | U | 41-74 | 55.4% | 54 | 13 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 43 | 9 | | 1/29/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 111-106 | W | -8 | L | 196 | O | 39-79 | 49.4% | 63 | 14 | 39-92 | 42.4% | 44 | 9 | | 1/30/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 86-92 | L | -3 | L | 204 | U | 33-78 | 42.3% | 56 | 19 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 43 | 11 | | 2/1/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 111-100 | W | -2.5 | W | 200.5 | O | 39-92 | 42.4% | 66 | 12 | 41-89 | 46.1% | 49 | 13 | | 2/3/2013 | @ DETROIT | 98-97 | W | -1.5 | L | 202 | U | 39-83 | 47.0% | 50 | 14 | 41-92 | 44.6% | 58 | 14 | | 2/5/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 92-83 | W | 3.5 | W | 198.5 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 52 | 13 | 31-89 | 34.8% | 58 | 16 | | 2/7/2013 | @ BOSTON | 95-116 | L | 1.5 | L | 194 | O | 36-87 | 41.4% | 56 | 12 | 46-87 | 52.9% | 54 | 9 | | 2/8/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 100-93 | W | -6.5 | W | 206 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 51 | 13 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 55 | 10 | | 2/10/2013 | @ MIAMI | 97-107 | L | 9 | L | 203.5 | O | 35-70 | 50.0% | 37 | 14 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 41 | 11 | | 2/12/2013 | PHOENIX | 91-85 | W | -9.5 | L | 202 | U | 36-83 | 43.4% | 53 | 19 | 35-85 | 41.2% | 55 | 19 | | 2/14/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 101-125 | L | 4 | L | 201 | O | 38-75 | 50.7% | 43 | 16 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 50 | 14 | | 2/20/2013 | BOSTON | 113-99 | W | -7 | W | 193.5 | O | 42-83 | 50.6% | 57 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 44 | 12 | | 2/22/2013 | PORTLAND | 111-107 | W | -9 | L | 203.5 | O | 40-85 | 47.1% | 54 | 16 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 53 | 14 | | 2/24/2013 | @ DALLAS | 103-99 | W | 3 | W | 212 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 53 | 16 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | | 2/25/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2013 | TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/10/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/12/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 97-117 | L | 9 | L | 209 | O | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 19 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 46 | 14 | | 1/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 108-112 | L | -10.5 | L | 203 | O | 41-84 | 48.8% | 46 | 14 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 57 | 20 | | 1/20/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 121-118 | W | 1 | W | 208.5 | O | 45-93 | 48.4% | 62 | 23 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 46 | 23 | | 1/23/2013 | @ HOUSTON | 105-95 | W | 3 | W | 218 | U | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 14 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 50 | 22 | | 1/26/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 121-93 | W | -12.5 | W | 214 | P | 47-89 | 52.8% | 55 | 15 | 37-88 | 42.0% | 52 | 19 | | 1/28/2013 | INDIANA | 102-101 | W | -5.5 | L | 193.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 14 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 49 | 18 | | 1/30/2013 | HOUSTON | 118-110 | W | -4 | W | 216.5 | O | 42-82 | 51.2% | 51 | 20 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 52 | 21 | | 2/1/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 113-98 | W | -7.5 | W | 205 | O | 44-84 | 52.4% | 38 | 8 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 43 | 21 | | 2/5/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 112-104 | W | -7 | W | 213 | O | 40-91 | 44.0% | 64 | 17 | 48-100 | 48.0% | 55 | 16 | | 2/7/2013 | CHICAGO | 128-96 | W | -6 | W | 196.5 | O | 50-86 | 58.1% | 53 | 10 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 44 | 14 | | 2/9/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 111-103 | W | -5.5 | W | 216 | U | 40-80 | 50.0% | 55 | 20 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 47 | 15 | | 2/10/2013 | @ BOSTON | 114-118 | L | 2 | L | 206.5 | O | 48-113 | 42.5% | 76 | 21 | 43-108 | 39.8% | 66 | 16 | | 2/12/2013 | @ TORONTO | 108-109 | L | 1.5 | W | 206.5 | O | 44-85 | 51.8% | 50 | 18 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 43 | 17 | | 2/13/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 108-119 | L | 3 | L | 196 | O | 42-79 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 41-75 | 54.7% | 48 | 13 | | 2/19/2013 | BOSTON | 97-90 | W | -9 | L | 204 | U | 33-77 | 42.9% | 54 | 7 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 49 | 12 | | 2/22/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 113-119 | L | -3 | L | 203.5 | O | 39-81 | 48.1% | 45 | 11 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 58 | 18 | | 2/23/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 113-99 | W | -10 | W | 208.5 | O | 44-83 | 53.0% | 45 | 17 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 50 | 18 | | 2/25/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/1/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/11/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/13/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| LA LAKERS is 42-35 against the spread versus DENVER since 1996 | | LA LAKERS is 54-26 straight up against DENVER since 1996 | | 41 of 75 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| DENVER is 10-7 against the spread versus LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | LA LAKERS is 9-8 straight up against DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | 10 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| DENVER is 20-19 against the spread versus LA LAKERS since 1996 | | LA LAKERS is 21-19 straight up against DENVER since 1996 | | 21 of 37 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| DENVER is 5-3 against the spread versus LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | DENVER is 5-3 straight up against LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/06/2013 | DENVER | 112 | 214 | SU ATS | 60 | 44-101 | 43.6% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 57 | 17 | 8 | | | LA LAKERS | 105 | -5.5 | Over | 60 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 10-30 | 33.3% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 60 | 13 | 18 | 12/26/2012 | LA LAKERS | 114 | 212.5 | Over | 54 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 11-29 | 37.9% | 21-30 | 70.0% | 52 | 11 | 14 | | | DENVER | 126 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 57 | 45-94 | 47.9% | 12-22 | 54.5% | 24-32 | 75.0% | 56 | 20 | 10 | 11/30/2012 | DENVER | 103 | 206 | Over | 57 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 47 | 13 | 15 | | | LA LAKERS | 122 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 71 | 47-87 | 54.0% | 17-33 | 51.5% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 52 | 15 | 15 | 05/12/2012 | DENVER | 87 | 193.5 | Under | 42 | 35-89 | 39.3% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 63 | 23 | 18 | | | LA LAKERS | 96 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 35-89 | 39.3% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 57 | 24 | 11 | 05/10/2012 | LA LAKERS | 96 | 196.5 | Over | 45 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 51 | 13 | 11 | | | DENVER | 113 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 47-91 | 51.6% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 57 | 10 | 11 | 05/08/2012 | DENVER | 102 | 196.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 55 | 8 | 7 | | | LA LAKERS | 99 | -6 | Over | 43 | 35-90 | 38.9% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 58 | 15 | 9 | 05/06/2012 | LA LAKERS | 92 | 202.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 58 | 19 | 13 | | | DENVER | 88 | -2 | Under | 51 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 50 | 13 | 10 | 05/04/2012 | LA LAKERS | 84 | 205 | Under | 39 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 51 | 13 | 15 | | | DENVER | 99 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 55 | 37-93 | 39.8% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 63 | 19 | 6 | 05/01/2012 | DENVER | 100 | 202.5 | ATS | 48 | 40-91 | 44.0% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 59 | 19 | 13 | | | LA LAKERS | 104 | -5.5 | SU Over | 55 | 43-96 | 44.8% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 56 | 18 | 10 | 04/29/2012 | DENVER | 88 | 203 | Under | 40 | 32-90 | 35.6% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 56 | 16 | 10 | | | LA LAKERS | 103 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 43-86 | 50.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 56 | 11 | 11 | 04/13/2012 | DENVER | 97 | 201 | Under | 48 | 41-92 | 44.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 49 | 18 | 15 | | | LA LAKERS | 103 | -3 | SU ATS | 54 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 53 | 14 | 22 | 02/03/2012 | LA LAKERS | 93 | 194.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-25 | 60.0% | 53 | 8 | 11 | | | DENVER | 89 | -3.5 | Under | 41 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 45 | 5 | 12 | 01/01/2012 | LA LAKERS | 90 | 199.5 | Under | 36 | 35-88 | 39.8% | 4-23 | 17.4% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 53 | 12 | 15 | | | DENVER | 99 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 52 | 5 | 15 | 12/31/2011 | DENVER | 89 | 198 | ATS | 45 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 44 | 8 | 14 | | | LA LAKERS | 92 | -4.5 | SU Under | 46 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 2-24 | 8.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 60 | 14 | 19 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LA LAKERS games 48.6% of the time since 1996. (568-600) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LA LAKERS games 46.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (78-89) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (545-525) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 57.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (95-70) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in LA LAKERS games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (672-648) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in LA LAKERS games 51.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (106-100) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 48.7% of the time since 1996. (567-598) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 46.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (88-102) | |
|
|
|
|
| [C] 01/11/2013 - Jordan Hill out for season ( Hip ) | | [F] 02/06/2013 - Pau Gasol out indefinitely ( Foot ) | |
| [F] 02/24/2013 - Danilo Gallinari probable Monday vs. LA Lakers ( Thigh ) |
|
|