|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| CHICAGO | CRAWFORD | 3.7 | 0, +101 | | | SAN JOSE | NIEMI | 3.7 | 0, -101 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-2 | +4.7 | 101-85 | -14 | 608-661 | -98.9 | 2-7 | 87-96 | 573-626 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the first half of the season | 2-0 | +2 | 21-16 | -1.8 | 134-135 | +9.8 | 0-2 | 15-22 | 112-135 | | in a road game where where the total is 5.5 | 4-1 | +2.6 | 41-43 | -6.5 | 169-173 | +10.1 | 1-4 | 39-45 | 161-188 | | in February games | 1-1 | 0 | 14-15 | -4.2 | 71-90 | -20.1 | 0-2 | 13-16 | 75-75 | | second half of the season | 7-2 | +4.7 | 57-52 | -10.7 | 332-377 | -68.1 | 2-7 | 49-57 | 333-337 | | on Tuesday nights | 1-0 | +1 | 10-16 | -10.8 | 63-80 | -17.4 | 0-1 | 10-16 | 56-78 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 0-1 | -1.4 | 24-21 | -5.3 | 125-128 | -13.3 | 0-1 | 18-27 | 101-131 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 2-2 | -0.4 | 7-11 | -8 | 80-86 | -8.8 | 0-4 | 5-13 | 69-87 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-0 | 0 | 13-12 | -1.4 | 81-101 | -21.9 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 76-92 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-0 | +2 | 54-45 | -2.2 | 314-333 | +11.5 | 0-2 | 42-55 | 294-310 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-2 | +4.1 | 109-87 | -12.5 | 722-616 | -42.4 | 2-6 | 91-96 | 585-654 | | in a home game where where the total is 5.5 | 5-0 | +5 | 44-27 | -4.9 | 170-111 | -11.7 | 1-4 | 34-37 | 137-148 | | after scoring 1 goal or less in their previous game | 0-1 | -1 | 16-18 | -8.5 | 140-142 | -32.2 | 0-1 | 18-16 | 135-130 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-1 | +3 | 60-50 | -1.4 | 358-319 | +18.6 | 1-4 | 52-54 | 297-327 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the first half of the season | 4-1 | +3 | 23-21 | -4.7 | 149-111 | +34 | 1-4 | 20-24 | 114-135 | | in February games | 0-2 | -2.9 | 16-13 | -2.2 | 83-80 | -19.7 | 0-2 | 13-15 | 71-80 | | second half of the season | 7-2 | +4.1 | 69-55 | -5.7 | 419-368 | -34.7 | 2-6 | 54-61 | 345-378 | | on Tuesday nights | 2-0 | +2 | 17-14 | -5.2 | 107-79 | +1.2 | 1-1 | 14-15 | 82-88 | | when playing on back-to-back days | 1-0 | +1 | 16-13 | +1.6 | 124-86 | +33.7 | 0-1 | 14-13 | 97-104 | | after a division game | 2-0 | +2 | 34-22 | +2.2 | 212-193 | -42.4 | 0-2 | 24-27 | 173-197 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 1-2 | -1.9 | 14-14 | -7.5 | 85-77 | -19.2 | 0-3 | 11-15 | 76-75 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-2-0 | +4.7 | 7-2 | +4.7 | 2-7 | 3.1 | 27.9 | 2.2 | 28.6 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 5-2-0 | +2.7 | 5-2 | +2.7 | 2-5 | 3.3 | 28.1 | 2.4 | 27.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2-0 | +0.6 | 3-2 | +0.6 | 0-5 | 2.2 | 26.0 | 2.0 | 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 9 | 28 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 251 | 11.2% | 35 | 7 | 20.0% | 47 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 7 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 197 | 11.7% | 29 | 5 | 17.2% | 37 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 130 | 8.5% | 15 | 1 | 6.7% | 18 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 20 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 257 | 7.8% | 36 | 2 | 5.6% | 32 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 17 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 193 | 8.8% | 28 | 1 | 3.6% | 26 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 150 | 6.7% | 24 | 1 | 4.2% | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CORY CRAWFORD (All Games) | 7 | 7 | 181 | 169 | 93.4% | 0 | 5-2 | +2.7 | 5-2-0 | +3 | 1-6 | | CORY CRAWFORD (Road Games) | 5 | 5 | 117 | 108 | 92.3% | 0 | 3-2 | +0.7 | 3-2-0 | +1 | 1-4 | | CORY CRAWFORD (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 103 | 97 | 94.2% | 0 | 2-2 | -0.4 | 2-2-0 | 0 | 0-4 | | RAY EMERY (All Games) | 2 | 2 | 76 | 70 | 92.1% | 0 | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0-0 | +2 | 1-1 | | RAY EMERY (Road Games) | 2 | 2 | 76 | 70 | 92.1% | 0 | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0-0 | +2 | 1-1 | | RAY EMERY (Last 4 Games) | 2 | 2 | 76 | 70 | 92.1% | 0 | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0-0 | +2 | 1-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-2-0 | +4.1 | 7-2 | +4.1 | 2-6 | 3.4 | 30.4 | 1.8 | 28.7 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 5-1-0 | +3.2 | 5-1 | +3.2 | 1-5 | 3.3 | 31.3 | 1.7 | 27.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2-0 | +0.1 | 3-2 | +0.1 | 0-5 | 2.4 | 27.2 | 1.8 | 27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 9 | 31 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 274 | 11.3% | 50 | 13 | 26.0% | 51 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 6 | 20 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 188 | 10.6% | 33 | 8 | 24.2% | 29 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 136 | 8.8% | 26 | 3 | 11.5% | 13 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 16 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 258 | 6.2% | 41 | 5 | 12.2% | 26 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 10 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 165 | 6.1% | 27 | 2 | 7.4% | 16 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 138 | 6.5% | 25 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
| THOMAS GREISS (All Games) | 2 | 2 | 56 | 54 | 96.4% | 1 | 1-1 | -0.1 | 1-1-0 | 0 | 0-2 | | THOMAS GREISS (Home Games) | 1 | 1 | 24 | 24 | 100.0% | 1 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0-0 | +1 | 0-1 | | THOMAS GREISS (Last 4 Games) | 2 | 2 | 56 | 54 | 96.4% | 1 | 1-1 | -0.1 | 1-1-0 | 0 | 0-2 | | ANTTI NIEMI (All Games) | 7 | 7 | 202 | 189 | 93.6% | 0 | 6-1 | +4.2 | 6-1-0 | +4 | 2-4 | | ANTTI NIEMI (Home Games) | 5 | 5 | 141 | 132 | 93.6% | 0 | 4-1 | +2.2 | 4-1-0 | +2 | 1-4 | | ANTTI NIEMI (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 106 | 100 | 94.3% | 0 | 3-1 | +1.2 | 3-1-0 | +1 | 0-4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 3.11, SAN JOSE 3.1 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 1/19/2013 | at LOS ANGELES | 5-2 | W | 0, +105 | W | 5 ov | O | | 1/20/2013 | at PHOENIX | 6-4 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/22/2013 | ST LOUIS | 3-2 | W | 0, -125 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/24/2013 | at DALLAS | 3-2 | W | 0, -125 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/26/2013 | at COLUMBUS | 3-2 | W | 0, -165 | W | 5.5 ov | U | | 1/27/2013 | DETROIT | 2-1 | W | 0, -145 | W | 5.5 ov | U | | 1/30/2013 | at MINNESOTA | 2-3 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/1/2013 | at VANCOUVER | 1-2 | L | 0, +115 | L | 5 ov | U | | 2/2/2013 | at CALGARY | 3-2 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5.5 ev | U | | 2/5/2013 | at SAN JOSE | | | 2/7/2013 | at PHOENIX | | | 2/10/2013 | at NASHVILLE | | | 2/12/2013 | ANAHEIM | | | 2/15/2013 | SAN JOSE | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/20/2013 | at CALGARY | 4-1 | W | 0, -135 | W | 5 ov | P | | 1/22/2013 | at EDMONTON | 6-3 | W | 0, -130 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/24/2013 | PHOENIX | 5-3 | W | 0, -200 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/26/2013 | COLORADO | 4-0 | W | 0, -155 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/27/2013 | VANCOUVER | 4-1 | W | 0, -120 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/29/2013 | ANAHEIM | 3-2 | W | 0, -160 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/31/2013 | EDMONTON | 3-2 | W | 0, -200 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 2/2/2013 | NASHVILLE | 1-2 | L | 0, -185 | L | 5 ov | U | | 2/4/2013 | at ANAHEIM | 1-2 | L | 0, -105 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/5/2013 | CHICAGO | | | 2/9/2013 | PHOENIX | | | 2/11/2013 | at COLUMBUS | | | 2/12/2013 | at NASHVILLE | | | 2/15/2013 | at CHICAGO | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| SAN JOSE is 35-28 (+2.0 Units) against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | SAN JOSE is 35-25-4 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 34 of 57 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=+9.3 Units) |
| |
| SAN JOSE is 5-3 (+2.4 Units) against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | SAN JOSE is 5-3-0 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=+1.4 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| SAN JOSE is 19-13 (+0.2 Units) against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | SAN JOSE is 19-10-3 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 16 of 28 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=+3.1 Units) |
| |
| SAN JOSE is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | SAN JOSE is 4-0-0 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+0.0 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/10/2012 | CHICAGO | 3 | 0, +120 | | Over | 33 | 6 | 3-0 | CRAWFORD | 27 | 22 | | | SAN JOSE | 5 | 0, -140 | 5.5 ev | SU ATS | 27 | 9 | 6-3 | NIEMI | 33 | 30 | | 1/15/2012 | SAN JOSE | 3 | 0, +100 | | Over | 24 | 5 | 3-0 | NIEMI | 40 | 36 | | | CHICAGO | 4 | 0, -120 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 40 | 8 | 1-0 | CRAWFORD | 24 | 21 | | 12/11/2011 | SAN JOSE | 2 | 0, +120 | | Under | 37 | 4 | 2-0 | NIEMI | 34 | 31 | | | CHICAGO | 3 | 0, -140 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 34 | 6 | 3-0 | EMERY | 37 | 35 | | 11/23/2011 | CHICAGO | 0 | 0, +130 | | Under | 34 | 0 | 4-0 | CRAWFORD | 21 | 20 | | | SAN JOSE | 1 | 0, -150 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 21 | 2 | 4-1 | NIEMI | 34 | 34 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| [D] 01/15/2013 - Steve Montador out indefinitely ( Concussion ) | | [F] 01/15/2013 - Rostislav Olesz out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [LW] 01/20/2013 - Daniel Carcillo out indefinitely ( Lower Body ) | | [D] 01/28/2013 - Michal Rozsival out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 02/02/2013 - David Bolland "?" Tuesday vs San Jose ( Leg ) | |
| [D] 01/22/2013 - Brent Burns expected to miss 7-10 days ( Hand ) | | [D] 02/04/2013 - Dan Boyle "?" Tuesday vs. Chicago ( Flu ) |
|
|